Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Braun ex rel. Situated, 136 S. Ct. 1512 (2016). · Go Syfert
Search
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Braun ex rel. Situated, 136 S. Ct. 1512 (2016). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
26 citation events (26 in the last 25 years) across 7 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Hoekman v. Education Minnesota (mnd, 2020-05-27)
Treatment trajectory · 2016 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2016 2021 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Hoekman v. Education Minnesota
D. Minnesota · 2020 · signal: see · confidence high
See Schlaud v. Snyder, 785 F.3d 1119, 1125 (6th Cir. 2015) (concluding that a “clear conflict” existed in proposed class that alleged that class was forced to financially support union, but that contained “substantial” number of members who favored financially supporting the union), cert. denied, 136 S. Ct. 1512 (2016).
discussed Cited "see" People v. Johnson
Colo. Ct. App. · 2017 · signal: see · confidence high
See Pena-Rodriguez v. People , 2015 CO 31 , ¶ 16, 350 P.3d 287 cert. granted , 578 U.S. ----, 136 S.Ct. 1513 , 194 L.Ed.2d 602 (2016) (recognizing that CRE 606(b)'s exception for "extraneous prejudicial information" applies, for instance, to a juror's improper investigations into a defendant's case or introduction of evidence from outside the record into the jury room). ¶ 62 The jury in this case was not exposed to information or influences outside of the trial process.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Aita, M. v. NCB Mngmt, Ser. (2×)
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2024 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Braun v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 24 A.3d 875, 960 (Pa.Super. 2011), cert. denied, 578 U.S. 905 , 136 S.Ct. 1512 , 194 L.Ed.2d 602 (2016) (acknowledging our mandate to construe WPCL liberally).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Carr
Kan. · 2022 · signal: see also · confidence low
We have previously noted that the inquiry into what constitutes testimonial hearsay "should generally seek to identify statements 78 that are by nature substituting for trial testimony." State v. Williams, 306 Kan. 175 , 197, 392 P.3d 1267 (2017); see also United States v. Katso, 74 M.J. 273, 279 (C.A.A.F. 2015) ("'[A] statement is testimonial if "made under circumstances which would lead an objective witness reasonably to believe that the statement would be available for use at a later trial."'"), cert. denied 136 S. Ct. 1512 (2016).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
WAL-MART STORES, INC.
v.
Michelle BRAUN, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated
No. 14–1123..
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 4, 2016.
136 S. Ct. 1512
Published

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Superior Court of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia Office denied.