Dailey v. United States, 136 S. Ct. 1688 (2016). · Go Syfert
Search
Dailey v. United States, 136 S. Ct. 1688 (2016). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
5 citation events (5 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Geasland (ca7, 2017-08-16)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Geasland
7th Cir. · 2017 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., United States v. Mateen, 806 F.3d 857, 860-63 (6th Cir. 2015) (holding that court must follow categorical approach which eschews consideration of facts underlying defendant’s prior conviction, but concluding in light of section 2252(b)(2)’s “relating to” language that state law proscribing non-consensual touching of another person’s erogenous zone for purposes of sexual arousal or gratification constituted law relating to sexual abuse, notwithstanding state cases expansively defining erogenous zones to include arm, shoulder, stomach, mouth and male chest), cert. denied, �…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Ernest DAILEY
v.
UNITED STATES.
No. 15–8458..
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 18, 2016.
136 S. Ct. 1688
Published

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.