Cordova-Soto v. United States, 136 S. Ct. 2507 (2016). · Go Syfert
Search
Cordova-Soto v. United States, 136 S. Ct. 2507 (2016). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
17 citation events (17 in the last 25 years) across 9 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Jose Ochoa (ca9, 2017-07-03)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Jose Ochoa
9th Cir. · 2017 · signal: see also · confidence low
See Soto-Mateo, 799 F.8d at 123 (joining “a majority of circuits [that] have rejected the proposition that there is a constitutional right to be informed of eligibility for — or to be considered for — discretionary relief’ (quoting United States v. Santiago-Ochoa, 447 F.3d 1015, 1020 (7th Cir. 2006))); see also United States v. Cordova-Soto, 804 F.3d 714, 723 (5th Cir. 2015) (describing the “majority of circuits,” but not the Ninth, as finding no constitutional right to be informed of eligibility for discretionary relief), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 136 S.Ct. 2507 , 195 L.Ed.2d 840 …
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Gabriela CORDOVA-SOTO
v.
UNITED STATES.
No. 15–945..
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 27, 2016.
136 S. Ct. 2507
Published

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.