Gillette Co. v. Cal. Franchise Tax Bd., 137 S. Ct. 294 (2016). · Go Syfert
Search
Gillette Co. v. Cal. Franchise Tax Bd., 137 S. Ct. 294 (2016). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
21 citation events (21 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Health Net, Inc. v. Dep't of Revenue (or, 2018-04-12)
Treatment trajectory · 2017 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2017 2021 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Health Net, Inc. v. Dep't of Revenue
Or. · 2018 · signal: see · confidence high
See Gillette Co. v. Franchise Tax Bd. , 62 Cal. 4th 468 , 477, 196 Cal.Rptr.3d 486 , 363 P.3d 94 , 99 (2015), cert. den. , --- U.S. ----, 137 S.Ct. 294 , 196 L.Ed.2d 238 (2016) (holding that the Multistate Tax Compact is not a binding contract among member states).
discussed Cited "see" Graphic Packaging Corp. v. Hegar
Tex. · 2017 · signal: see · confidence high
See Gillette Co. v. Franchise Tax Bd., 62 Cal.4th 468 , 196 Cal.Rptr.3d 486 , 363 P.3d 94 , 99-103 (2015), cert. denied , --- U.S. ----, 137 S.Ct. 294 , 196 L.Ed.2d 238 (2016) (holding that the Compact does not contractually bar states from overriding the Compact's apportionment provisions); Kimberly-Clark Corp. v. Comm'r of Revenue , 880 N.W.2d 844 , 848-52 (Minn. 2016), cert. denied --- U.S. ----, 137 S.Ct. 598 , 196 L.Ed.2d 476 (2016) (holding that legislature did not violate the Contract Clause when repealing Articles III & IV of the Compact and that, if the Compact apportionment election …
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
The GILLETTE COMPANY
v.
CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD
No. 15–1442..
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 11, 2016.
137 S. Ct. 294
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of California denied.
Consideration, Took.
Published
Justice ALITO took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.