green
Positive treatment
11.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 2016 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2016
2021
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Jones
(2×)
See United States v. Houston, 813 F.3d 282, 287-88 (6th Cir. 2016) (upholding 10-week surveillance), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 137 S.Ct. 567 , 196 L.Ed. 2d 448 (2016); Bucci, 582 F.3d at 116-17 (upholding eight-month surveillance); United States v. Gonzalez, 328 F.3d 543, 548 (9th Cir. 2003); United States v. Jackson, 213 F.3d 1269, 1280-81 (10th Cir. 2000), vacated on other grounds, 531 U.S. 1033 , 121 S.Ct. 621 , 148 L.Ed. 2d 531 (2000); United States v. Pratt, No. 16-cr-20677-06, 2017 WL 2403570 , at *5 (E.D.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Baez-Martinez
Even if a defendant commits murder without the direct use of force, such as by poison, guile, deception, or deliberate omission, a defendant would still necessarily use “a device to cause physical harm,” i.e. death, just as Castleman “employ[ed] poison knowingly as a device to cause physical harm.” Id.; see United States v. Waters, 823 F.3d 1062, 1066 (7th Cir.) (“Likewise, withholding medicine causes physical harm, albeit indirectly, and thus qualifies as the use of force under Castleman.”), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 137 S.Ct. 569 , 196 L.Ed.2d 448 (2016).
discussed
Cited "see"
Kim v. Commonwealth
(2×)
See Vasquez v. Commonwealth , 291 Va. 232 , 236, 781 S.E.2d 920 , 922, cert. denied , --- U.S. ----, 137 S.Ct. 568 , 196 L.Ed.2d 448 (2016).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Bailey
De Leon Castellanos v. Holder, 652 F.3d 762, 766-67 (7th Cir. 2011) (discussing domestic battery under 720 ILCS 5/12-3.2); United States v. Rodriguez-Gomez, 608 F.3d 969, 973-74 (7th Cir. 2010) (discussing battery under 720 ILCS 5/12-3(a)(i)); see United States v. Waters, 823 F.3d 1062, 1065 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 137 S.Ct. 569 , 196 L.Ed.2d 448 (2016) (declining to overturn De Leon Castellanos).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Gore
See, e.g., United States v. Houston, 813 F.3d 282, 287, 292 (6th Cir.) (trial court properly allowed video surveillance identification testimony of federal agent who had observed defendant in drive-bys of defendant’s farm), cert. denied, U.S. , 137 S. Ct. 567 , 196 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Gore
See, e.g., United States v. Houston, 813 F.3d 282, 287, 292 (6th Cir.) (trial court properly allowed video surveillance identification testimony of federal agent who had observed defendant in drive-bys of defendant’s farm), cert. denied, U.S. , 137 S. Ct. 567 , 196 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Gore
See, e.g., United States v. Houston, 813 F.3d 282, 287, 292 (6th Cir.) (trial court properly allowed video surveillance identification testimony of federal agent who had observed defendant in drive-bys of defendant’s farm), cert. denied, U.S. , 137 S. Ct. 567 , 196 L.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Marcos SOTO-MENDOZA
v.
UNITED STATES.
v.
UNITED STATES.
No. 16–5390..
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 5, 2016.
Published
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.