Ceja-Lua v. Lynch, 137 S. Ct. 830 (2017). · Go Syfert
Search
Ceja-Lua v. Lynch, 137 S. Ct. 830 (2017). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“a due process claim raising a mixed.question of law and fact is reviewed de novo.”
23 citation events (23 in the last 25 years) across 12 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Haffey v. Crocker (In re Haffey) (bap6, 2017-11-28)
Treatment trajectory · 2017 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2017 2021 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Haffey v. Crocker (In re Haffey)
6th Cir. BAP · 2017 · signal: see · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
a due process claim raising a mixed.question of law and fact is reviewed de novo.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Abel CEJA-LUA
v.
Loretta E. LYNCH, Attorney General.
No. 16–471..
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 23, 2017.
137 S. Ct. 830
Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 64%
Citer courts: Sixth Circuit (1)

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.