green
Positive treatment
3.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 2018 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2018
2022
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
State Of Washington, V. Jacob Dee Vernon
See State v. Ramos, 187 Wn.2d 420, 451-53 , 387 P.3d 650 (“Although we cannot say that every reasonable judge would necessarily make the same decisions as the court did here, we cannot reweigh the evidence on review,” and the trial court did not err in finding substantial and compelling reasons to impose an exceptional sentence downward.), cert. denied, 538 U.S. 995 , 138 S. Ct. 467 , 199 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State of Washington v. Vincente Guizar Figueroa
The Sentencing Reform Act of 1981 (SRA), chapter 9.94A RCW, provides that a standard range sentence “shall not be appealed.” RCW 9.94A.585(1); see also former RCW 9.94A.210(1) (1989). “‘However, this prohibition does not bar a party’s right to challenge the underlying legal conclusions and determinations by which a court comes to apply a particular sentencing provision.’” State v. Ramos, 187 Wn.2d 420, 433 , 387 P.3d 650 , cert. denied, 138 S. Ct. 467 , 199 L.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Jenny RUBIN
v.
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
v.
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
No. 16–534..
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 21, 2017.
Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument granted.
Consideration, Motion, Took.
Published
Justice KAGAN took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.