green
Positive treatment
9.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 1958 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1958
1992
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 28 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Settler v. Lameer
Barta v. Oglala Sioux Tribe of Pine Ridge Reservation, 259 F.2d 553 (8 Cir. 1958), cert. den., 358 U.S. 932 , 79 S.Ct. 320 , 3 L.Ed.2d 304 (1959); Martinez v. Southern Ute Tribe of Southern Ute Reservation, 249 F.2d 915 (10 Cir. 1957), cert. den., 356 U.S. 960 , 78 S.Ct.. 998, 2 L.Ed.2d 1067 (1958); Native American Church of North America v. Navajo Tribal Council, 272 F.2d 131 (10 Cir. 1959).
discussed
Cited "see"
Poodry v. Tonawanda Band Of Seneca Indians
(2×)
See Martinez v. Southern Ute Tribe of the Southern Ute Reservation, 249 F.2d 915, 919 (10th Cir.1957) (Due Process Clause of Fifth Amendment), cert. denied, 356 U.S. 960 , 78 S.Ct. 998 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1067 (1958); Native American Church v. Navajo Tribal Council, 272 F.2d 131 , 134 (10th Cir.1959) (free exercise of religious beliefs under First and Fourteenth Amendments); Twin Cities Chippewa Tribal Council v. Minnesota Chippewa Tribe, 370 F.2d 529, 533 (8th Cir.1967) (Due Process Clause of Fourteenth Amendment). 7 21 However, as acknowledged by those cases recognizing specific areas of tribal auth…
discussed
Cited "see"
Poodry v. Tonawanda Band of Seneca Indians
(2×)
See Martinez v. Southern Ute Tribe of the Southern Ute Reservation, 249 F.2d 915, 919 (10th Cir.1957) (Due Process Clause of Fifth Amendment), cert. denied, 356 U.S. 960 , 78 S.Ct. 998 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1067 (1958); Native American Church v. Navajo Tribal Council, 272 F.2d 131 , 134 (10th Cir.1959) (free exercise of religious beliefs under First and Fourteenth Amendments); Twin Cities Chippewa Tribal Council v. Minnesota Chippewa Tribe, 370 F.2d 529, 533 (8th Cir.1967) (Due Process Clause of Fourteenth Amendment). 7 However, as acknowledged by those cases recognizing specific areas of tribal authori…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Terrance Frank
(2×)
See Lyles v. United States, 254 F.2d 725, 728 (D.C.Cir.1957), cert. denied, 356 U.S. 961 , 78 S.Ct. 997 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1067 (1958). 99 The Insanity Defense Reform Act of 1984 created a comprehensive evaluation and commitment procedure for federal court defendants outside of the District of Columbia who are found not guilty by reason of insanity.
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Merritt Logan, Inc., Debtor-In-Possession. Merritt Logan, Inc. D/B/A Rancocas Thriftway v. Fleming Companies, Inc. Fleming Foods of Pennsylvania, Inc. Hussman Refrigeration, Inc. And Engineering & Refrigeration, Inc., Appeal of Engineering and Refrigeration, Inc., at No. 89-1522 in Re Merritt Logan, Inc. Debtor-In-Possession. Merritt Logan, Inc. D/B/A Rancocas Thriftway v. Fleming Companies, Inc. Fleming Foods of Pennsylvania, Inc. Hussman Refrigeration, Inc. And Engineering & Refrigeration, Inc. Appeal of Hussman Refrigeration, Inc., at No. 89-1523 in Re Merritt Logan, Inc. Debtor-In-Possession. Merritt Logan, Inc. D/B/A Rancocas Thriftway v. Fleming Companies, Inc. Fleming Foods of Pennsylvania, Inc. Hussman Refrigeration, Inc. And Engineering & Refrigeration, Inc. Appeal of Merritt Logan, Inc., at No. 89-1524 in Re Merritt Logan, Inc. Debtor-In-Possession. Merritt Logan, Inc. D/B/A Rancocas Thriftway v. Fleming Companies, Inc. Fleming Foods of Pennsylvania, Inc. Hussman Refrigeration, Inc. And Engineering & Refrigeration, Inc. Appeal of Fleming Companies, Inc. And Fleming Foods of Pennsylvania, Inc. At No. 89-1525
Keller, Jr., concurring in the $130,500 forecast and stating it was "extremely conservative", see id. at 3252a-53a; Mr. Logan's testimony stating that the $130,500 projection was conservative, see id. at 118a; Merritt Logan's sales records showing that sales for the first week exceeded $174,000, see id. at 3208a; Fleming's pro forma operating statement prepared in reliance on Gilchrist's survey, showing expected weekly sales of $130,500; and the testimony of John Traub, Fleming's Store Development Manager, concerning the pro forma; see id. at 1435a-36a, 1440a-44a. 51 In order to show its expen…
discussed
Cited "see"
Durant v. United States
(2×)
Id. at 73-74 , 147 F.2d at 304-05 ; see Lyles v. United States, 103 U.S.App.D.C. 22 , 28, 254 F.2d 725, 731 (1957), cert. denied, 356 U.S. 961 , 78 S.Ct. 997 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1067 (1958) (psychiatric opinion inadmissible).
examined
Cited "see"
State of Oklahoma Ex Rel. Oklahoma Tax Commission v. Jan Graham and Chickasaw Nation, by and Through Overton James, Governor of the Chickasaw Nation
(4×)
See Martinez v. Southern Ute Tribe, 249 F.2d 915 , 917 (10th Cir.1957), cert. denied, 356 U.S. 960 , 78 S.Ct. 998 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1067 (1958) (federal question jurisdiction does not exist merely because an Indian is a party or because the suit involves Indian property or contracts).
discussed
Cited "see"
Weeks Construction, Inc. v. Oglala Sioux Housing Authority, United States of America, and Department of Housing and Urban Development
(2×)
See Martinez v. Southern Ute Tribe, 249 F.2d 915 , 917 (10th Cir.1957), cert. denied, 356 U.S. 960 , 78 S.Ct. 998 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1067 (1958) (federal question jurisdiction does not exist merely because an Indian is a party or because the suit involves Indian property or contracts).
discussed
Cited "see"
White v. Estelle
See Lyles v. United States, 254 F.2d 725, 730 (CADC 1957) (opinion of Prettyman and Burger, JJ.) ("the competency of the accused at the time of trial to understand the charges against him and to assist in his defense is a legal question for the judge, not the jury"), cert. denied, 356 U.S. 961 , 78 S.Ct. 997 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1067 (1958).
cited
Cited "see"
Ameejee Valleejee & Sons v. M/V Victoria U.
See Gardner v. The Calvert, 253 F.2d 395, 402-03 (3 Cir.), cert. denied, 356 U.S. 960 , 78 S.Ct. 997 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1067 (1958) (court not bound to charge maximum legal rates of interest).
cited
Cited "see"
Ameejee Valleejee and Sons v. M/v Victoria U., (Ex Pishtaz Iran), Her Engines, Boilers, Tackle, Furniture, Apparel, Etc., in Rem, Ameejee Valleejee and Sons v. M/v Victoria U., (Ex Pishtaz Iran), Her Engines, Boilers, Tackle, Furniture, Apparel, Etc., in Rem
See Gardner v. The Calvert, 253 F.2d 395, 402-03 (3 Cir.), cert. denied, 356 U.S. 960 , 78 S.Ct. 997 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1067 (1958) (court not bound to charge maximum legal rates of interest).
cited
Cited "see"
State ex rel. Van Orden v. Floyd Circuit Court
See Lyles v. United States, (1957) 103 U.S.App.D.C. 22 , 254 F.2d 725 , cert. denied, (1958) 356 U.S. 961 , 78 S.Ct. 997 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1067 .
cited
Cited "see"
Harris v. United States
See Lyles v. United States, 103 U.S.App.D.C. *633 22, 26, 254 F.2d 725, 729 (1957), cert. denied, 356 U.S. 961 , 78 S.Ct. 997 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1067 (1958).
cited
Cited "see"
Santiago v. Sea-Land Service, Inc.
See Gardner v. The Calvert, 253 F.2d 395 , 402, 1958 A.M.C. 800, 809-810 (3rd Cir.), cert. den. 356 U.S. 960 , 78 S.Ct. 997 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1067 (1958); Interstate Steel Corp. v. SS.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Ronald Thomas Bohle
(2×)
See Lyles v. United States, 103 U.S.App.D.C. 22 , 254 F.2d 725, 740-741 (1957) (dissenting opinion), cert. den. 356 U.S. 961 , 78 S.Ct. 997 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1067 (1958); and New York Life Ins.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Paul W. Marcey
See Lyles v. United States, 103 U.S.App.D.C. 22 , 27, 254 F.2d 725, 730 (en banc 1957), cert. denied, 356 U.S. 961 , 78 S.Ct. 997 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1067 (1958). 25 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Clifford H. Collins
(2×)
See Lyles v. United States, 103 U.S.App.D.C. 22 , 254 F.2d 725 (1957), cert. denied, 356 U.S. 961 , 78 S.Ct. 997 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1067 (1958). .
discussed
Cited "see"
Robert Lee Tarin v. United States
See Lyles v. United States, 103 U.S.App.D.C. 22 , 254 F.2d 725 , certiorari denied 356 U.S. 961 , 78 S.Ct. 997 , 2 L.Ed. 2d 1067 , certiorari denied 362 U.S. 943 , 80 S.Ct. 809 , 4 L.Ed.2d 771 , certiorari denied 368 U.S. 992 , 82 S.Ct. 610 , 7 L.Ed. 2d 529 ; Mercer v. Theriot, 377 U.S. 152 , 84 S.Ct. 1157 , 12 L.Ed.2d 206 (1964); Roland v. United States, 295 F.2d 471 (5 Cir. 1961); Glenn v. United States, 303 F.2d 536 (5 Cir. 1962); and Traxler v. United States, 293 F.2d 327 (5 Cir. 1961).
discussed
Cited "see"
Dr. Dale C. Cameron v. William v. Fisher
See Lyles v. United States, 103 U.S.App.D.C. 22 , 26, 254 F.2d 725, 729 (1957), cert. denied, 356 U.S. 961 , 78 S.Ct. 997 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1067 (1958), as to the distinction between persistent mental disease and competency to stand trial; id., dissenting opinion, 103 U.S.App.D.C. at 31-32, 254 F.2d at 734-735 . .
discussed
Cited "see"
Arthur Jones v. United States
(2×)
See Lyles v. United States, 1957, 103 U.S.App.D.C. 22 , 254 F.2d 725 , certiorari denied 1958, 356 U.S. 961 , 78 S.Ct. 997 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1067 . .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Barker-Hatch v. Viejas Group Baron Long Capitan Grande Band of Digueno Mission Indians of Viejas Group Reservation
(2×)
See Gila River Indian Community v. Henningson, Durham & Richardson, 626 F.2d 708, 715 (9th Cir.1980), ce rt. denied, 451 U.S. 911 , 101 S.Ct. 1983 , 68 L.Ed.2d 301 (1981); see also Martinez v. Southern Ute Tribe, 249 F.2d 915 , 917 (10th Cir.1957), cert. denied, 356 U.S. 960 , 78 S.Ct. 998 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1067 (1958).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Navieros Inter-Americanos, S.A., Inc. v. M/V \Vasilia Express\""
See also Gardner v. The Calvert, 253 F.2d 395, 399-400 (3rd Cir.), cert. denied, 356 U.S. 960 , 78 S.Ct. 997 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1067 (1958).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. James A. Fisher, III
See, e.g., Lyles v. United States, 254 F.2d 725 (D.C.Cir.1957), cert. denied, 356 U.S. 961 , 78 S.Ct. 997 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1067 (1958).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Michael Wood, (Two Cases)
(2×)
See also Lyles v. United States, 254 F.2d 725 , 735 n. 4 (D.C.Cir.1957) (en banc) (Bazelon, J., dissenting), cert. denied, 356 U.S. 961 , 78 S.Ct. 997 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1067 (1958) 93 Maj.Op. at 559 94 At most, it might be argued that Dr. Kaufman's testimony reduces the likelihood that another psychiatrist would have offered a contrary view.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United Counties Trust Company v. Podvey
Aside from any authority virtute officii arising from his position as president of the bank (see Elblum Holding Corp. v. Mintz, 120 N.J.L. 604 (Sup. Ct. 1938) and cases cited therein; see also, Gardner v. The Calvert, 253 F. 2d 395 (3 Cir.1958), cert. den. 356 U.S. 960 , 78 S.Ct. 997 , 2 L.Ed. 2d 1067 (1958)) it is clear from the evidence, including the testimony of former employees of the Springfield State Bank, now employed by plaintiff and produced by plaintiff as witnesses, that Spears was given a free reign in the operations of the bank and, specifically, the loan department.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Government of the Virgin Islands v. Ivar Fredericks
(2×)
Compare, e. g., State v. Hood, 123 Vt. 273 , 187 A.2d 499, 501 (1963), With, e. g., Commonwealth v. Mutina, 366 Mass. 810 , 323 N.E.2d 294, 300-301 (1975), And Lyles v. United States, 103 U.S.App.D.C. 22 , 25, 254 F.2d 725, 728 (1957) (en banc), Cert. denied, 356 U.S. 961 , 78 S.Ct. 997 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1067 (1958) 16 Several courts have first observed prejudice to a defendant absent the sort of charge Fredericks requests before deciding to require such an instruction.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Dale Estin Birdsell v. United States
(2×)
Compare Lyles v. United States, 103 U.S.App.D.C. 22 , 254 F.2d 725, 730 (1957), cert. denied, 356 U.S. 961 , 78 S.Ct. 997 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1067 (1959). .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Frank Horton v. United States
Compare Lyles v. United States, 103 U.S.App.D.C. 22 , 28-29, 254 F.2d 725, 731-732 (1957), cert. denied, 356 U.S. 961 , 78 S.Ct. 997 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1067 (1958). 3 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Markham
v.
Ellis, General Manager, Texas Department of Corrections
v.
Ellis, General Manager, Texas Department of Corrections
No. 508.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 19, 1958.
Published
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas. Certiorari denied.