green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
5.5 score
“questions of substantive law are controlled by the laws of the state where the cause of action arose”
Treatment trajectory · 1957 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1957
1991
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 18 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
A. Copeland Enterprises, Inc. v. Guste
questions of substantive law are controlled by the laws of the state where the cause of action arose
discussed
Cited "see"
Lubbock Central Appraisal District v. Silverstar Aviation, Inc., Now Omniflight Helicopter, Inc.
See State of California v. Copus, 158 Tex. 196 , 309 S.W.2d 227, 229 (1958), cert. denied , 356 U.S. 967 , 78 S.Ct. 1006 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1074 (1958) (noting that the universally recognized general rule is that statutes of a state ex proprio vigore (footnote: 4) have no extraterritorial effect).
discussed
Cited "see"
Lubbock Central Appraisal District v. Silverstar Aviation, Inc., Now Omniflight Helicopter, Inc.
See State of California v. Copus, 158 Tex. 196 , 309 S.W.2d 227, 229 (1958), cert. denied, 356 U.S. 967 , 78 S.Ct. 1006 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1074 (1958) (noting that the universally recognized general rule is that statutes of a state ex proprio vigore4 have no extraterritorial effect).
discussed
Cited "see"
Lubbock Central Appraisal District v. Silverstar Aviation, Inc., Now Omniflight Helicopter, Inc.
See State of California v. Copus, 158 Tex. 196 , 309 S.W.2d 227, 229 (1958), cert. denied , 356 U.S. 967 , 78 S.Ct. 1006 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1074 (1958) (noting that the universally recognized general rule is that statutes of a state ex proprio vigore (4) have no extraterritorial effect).
discussed
Cited "see"
Rapp Collins Worldwide, Inc. v. Mohr
See Calif. v. Copus, 158 Tex. 196 , 309 S.W.2d 227, 230 , cert. denied, 356 U.S. 967 , 78 S.Ct. 1006 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1074 (1958) The parties disagree on whether an award of attorney’s fees is a substantive or remedial right, and therefore, which law applies.
discussed
Cited "see"
Springfield Oil Services, Inc. v. Costello
See ¶ 11.4 (“This Agreement, the application or interpretation hereof and the liability of the parties hereto shall be governed exclusively by the laws of the State of Texas.”). 2 Because Texas law provides that the law of the forum state controls as to procedural matters, including statute of limitations, State of California v. Copus, 158 Tex. 196 , 309 S.W.2d 227, 230-231 , cert. denied, 356 U.S. 967 , 78 S.Ct. 1006 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1074 (1958); Hollander v. Capon, 853 S.W.2d 723, 727 (Tex.Ct.App.1993), this Court applies the substantive law of Texas and the statutes of limitations of Pennsy…
cited
Cited "see"
Elaine Roselyn Tennimon v. Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc.
See State of California v. Copus, 158 Tex. 196, 201 , 309 S.W.2d 227, 230-31 , c ert. denied, 356 U.S. 967 , 78 S.Ct. 1006 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1074 (1958).
cited
Cited "see"
Robert Johansen v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.
See Copus, 158 Tex. 196 , 309 S.W.2d 227 , cert. denied, 356 U.S. 967 , 78 S.Ct. 1006 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1074 (1958).
discussed
Cited "see"
Koonce v. Quaker Safety Products & Manufacturing Co.
See State of California v. Copus, 158 Tex. 196 , 309 S.W.2d 227, 231 (1958), cert. denied, 356 U.S. 967 , 78 S.Ct. 1006 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1074 (1958); Jamerson v. Miles, 421 F.Supp. 107, 111 (N.D.Tex.1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
21 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 631, prod.liab.rep.(cch)p 11,207 Rita Koonce v. Quaker Safety Products & Manufacturing Company, and Delaware Valley Safeguards Company, Inc.
See State of California v. Copus, 158 Tex. 196 , 309 S.W.2d 227, 231 (1958), cert. denied, 356 U.S. 967 , 78 S.Ct. 1006 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1074 (1958); Jamerson v. Miles, 421 F.Supp. 107, 111 (N.D.Tex.1976).
cited
Cited "see"
COX v. McDONNELL-DOUGLAS CORP.
See State of California v. Copus, 158 Tex. 196 , 309 S.W.2d 227, 230-31 , cert. denied, 356 U.S. 967 , 78 S.Ct. 1006 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1074 (1958).
cited
Cited "see"
Cox v. McDonnell-Douglas Corp.
See State of California v. Copus, 158 Tex. 196 , 309 S.W.2d 227, 230-31 , c ert. denied, 356 U.S. 967 , 78 S.Ct. 1006 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1074 (1958).
cited
Cited "see"
Taylor v. Titan Midwest Construction Corp.
See State of California v. Copus, 158 Tex. 196 , 309 S.W.2d 227 (1958), cert. denied, 356 U.S. 967 , 78 S.Ct. 1006 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1074 .
cited
Cited "see"
State of Maine v. Robert W. Fri, Etc.
See Connell v. Dulien Steel Products, Inc., 240 F.2d 414 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 356 U.S. 968 , 78 S.Ct. 1008 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1074 (1957); 11 Wright & Miller, supra at 520-521.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Goad v. Celotex Corp.
See, e.g., California v. Copus, 158 Tex. 196 , 309 S.W.2d 227 , cert. denied, 356 U.S. 967 , 78 S.Ct. 1006 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1074 (1958).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Hardwick
Ed. 680 (1942); State v. Bember, 183 Conn. 394, 401 , 439 A.2d 387 (1981); see also Wojculewicz v. Cummings, 145 Conn. 11, 19 , 138 A.2d 512 , cert. denied, 356 U.S. 969 , 78 S. Ct. 1010 , 2 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Hardwick
Glasser v. United States, 315 U.S. 60 , 82 , 62 S.Ct. 457 , 86 L.Ed. 680 (1942); State v. Bember, 183 Conn. 394 , 401 , 439 A.2d 387 (1981); see also Wojculewicz v. Cummings, 145 Conn. 11 , 19 , 138 A.2d 512 , cert. denied, 356 U.S. 969 , *Page 611 78 S.Ct. 1010 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1075 (1958).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Stavis Ipswich Clam Co. v. Green
(2×)
See also State of California v. Copus (1958) 158 Tex. 196 , 309 S.W.2d 227 , [1-3] 229, cert. den. 356 U.S. 967 , 78 S.Ct. 1006 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1074 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Orleans Parish School Board
v.
Bush
v.
Bush
No. 979.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 26, 1958.
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Gerard A. Rault for petitioner.