Duncan v. Rhay, 357 U.S. 910 (1958). · Go Syfert
Search
Duncan v. Rhay, 357 U.S. 910 (1958). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
86 citation events (11 in the last 25 years) across 13 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Pindale (njsuperctappdiv, 1991-06-28)
Treatment trajectory · 1959 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1959 1992 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" State v. Pindale
N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. · 1991 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Bucanis, 26 N.J. 45, 56 , 138 A. 2d 739 (1958), cert. denied, 357 U.S. 910 , 78 S.Ct. 1157 , 2 L.Ed. 2d 1160 (1958).
cited Cited "see" State v. Douglas
N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. · 1985 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Bucanis, 26 N.J. 45, 57 , cert. den. 357 U.S. 910 , 78 S.Ct. 1157 , 2 L.Ed. 2d 1160 (1958).
cited Cited "see" State v. Walker
N.J. · 1960 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Bucanis, 26 N. J. 45, 53, 54 (1958), certiorari denied 357 U. S. 910 , 78 S. Ct. 1157 , 2 L.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Timmendequas (2×)
N.J. · 1999 · signal: see also · confidence low
See Feaster, supra, 156 N.J. at 59, 716 A. 2d 395 ; Harris, supra, 156 N.J. 122 , 716 A. 2d 458 ; Roach, supra, 146 N.J. at 219, 680 A. 2d 634 ; Rose, supra, 112 N.J. at 519, 548 A. 2d 1058 ; see also State v. Johnson, 120 N.J. 263, 296 , 576 A. 2d 834 (1990) (noting that a prosecutor's summation "`is limited to commenting upon the evidence and the reasonable inferences to be drawn therefrom'") (quoting State v. Bucanis, 26 N.J. 45, 56 , 138 A. 2d 739 , cert. denied, 357 U.S. 910 , 78 S.Ct. 1157 , 2 L.Ed. 2d 1160 (1958)).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Hogan
N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. · 1997 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also, State v. Bucanis, 26 N.J. 45 , 138 A.2d 739 , cert. denied, 357 U.S. 910 , 78 S.Ct. 1157 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1160 (1958), which concluded: [N]ot every suspected deviation from perfection on the part of a prosecutor will justify a reversal of a conviction____ [H]is infraction must be clear and unmistakable and must substantially prejudice the defendant’s fundamental right to have the jury fairly evaluate the merits of his defense. [ Bucanis, supra 26 N.J. at 56 , 138 A.2d 739 .] For the reasons hereafter discussed, we conclude that the prosecutor’s comments in his opening statement were s…
cited Cited "see, e.g." State v. Jasuilewicz
N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. · 1985 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also State v. Bucanis, 26 N.J. 45, 54 (1958), cert. den. 357 U.S. 910 , 78 S.Ct. 1157 , 2 L.Ed. 2d 1160 (1958).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Louis v. State
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1985 · signal: compare · confidence low
See Lee v. State, 141 So.2d 257, 259 (Fla.1962); Larry v. State, 104 So.2d 352, 354 (Fla.1958); compare Sons v. State, 99 So.2d 888 (Fla. 2d DCA), cert. denied, 357 U.S. 910 , 78 S.Ct. 1157 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1160 (1958).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Duncan
v.
Rhay, Superintendent, Washington State Penitentiary
No. 703.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 9, 1958.
357 U.S. 910
Published

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.