green
Positive treatment
2.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1958 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1958
1992
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
In Re the Requested Extradition of Doherty Ex Rel. Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain & Northern Ireland
But see Karadzole v. Artukovic, 247 F.2d 198, 204-05 (9th Cir. 1957), aff'g, Artukovic v. Boyle, 140 F.Supp. 245 (S.D.Calif.1956), vacated, 355 U.S. 393 , 78 S.Ct. 381 , 2 L.Ed.2d 356 (1958); Quinn v. Robinson, No. C-82-6688 RPA, slip op. at 22-23, 29-32 (N.D.Cal.
discussed
Cited "see"
Andrija Artukovic v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
(2×)
See Artukovic v. Boyle, 140 F.Supp. 245 (S.D.Cal.1956), aff'd sub nom., Karadzole v. Artukovic, 247 F.2d 198 (9th Cir.1957), vacated and remanded, 355 U.S. 393 , 78 S.Ct. 381 , 2 L.Ed.2d 356 (1958).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
William Joseph Quinn v. Glen Robinson, United States Marshal for the Northern District of California
(2×)
See, e.g., Karadzole v. Artukovic, 247 F.2d 198, 204 (9th Cir.1957) (noting that district court properly took judicial notice of struggle for political control in Croatia), vacated and remanded, 355 U.S. 393 , 78 S.Ct. 381 , 2 L.Ed.2d 356 (1958) (mem.); Ramos v. Diaz, 179 F.Supp. 459, 462 (S.D.Fla.1959) (extradition court took judicial notice of revolutionary movement in Cuba); In re McMullen, No. 3-78-1099 MG, slip op. at 4 (N.D.Cal.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Handel v. Artukovic
See, e.g., Artukovic v. Boyle, 140 F.Supp. 245 (S.D.Cal.1956), aff'd sub nom., Karadzole v. Artukovic, 247 F.2d 198 (9th Cir.1957), vacated and remanded, 355 U.S. 393 , 78 S.Ct. 381 , 2 L.Ed.2d 356 (1958). 6 Plaintiffs have not alleged that they did not know that defendant resided in California, or that newly discovered evidence linked him to their claims, or any other fact, apart from the disruption of the war itself, that would trigger considerations of the kind involved in California’s, or any other state’s, tolling provisions.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re the Extradition of Gonzalez
See also, Karadzole v. Artukovic, 247 F.2d 198 (9th Cir., 1957), rev’d on other grounds, 355 U.S. 393 , 78 S.Ct. 381 , 2 L.Ed.2d 356 (1958).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Zavada
v.
United States
v.
United States
65 M.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 20, 1958.
Petitioner pro se., Solicitor General Rankin, Warren Olney, III, then Assistant Attorney General, and Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States.
Clark, Harlan, Whittaker.
Cited by 8 opinions | Published
Per Curiam.
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is reversed and the case is remanded to the United States District Court for the' Northern District of Ohio for a hearing. Walker v. Johnston, 312 U. S. 275; Holiday v. Johnston, 313 U. S. 342.
Mr. Justice Clark, Mr. Justice Harlan, and Mr. Justice Whittaker dissent.