green
Positive treatment
6.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1958 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1958
1992
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 20 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Great Lakes Business Trust v. M/T Orange Sun
(2×)
See Moore-McConnack Lines, Inc. v. The Esso Camden, 244 F.2d 198 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 355 U.S. 822 , 78 S.Ct. 29 , 2 L.Ed.2d 37 (1957).
cited
Cited "see"
Blair v. United States
See Anderson v. United States, 138 Ct.Cl. 192, 195 , 150 F.Supp. 881, 883 (1957), cert. denied 355 U.S. 822 , 78 S.Ct. 31 , 2 L.Ed.2d 37 (1957).
cited
Cited "see"
The Interface Group, Inc. v. Massachusetts Port Authority
See Packard Motor Car Co. v. Webster Motor Car Co., 243 F.2d 418 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 355 U.S. 822 , 78 S.Ct. 29 , 2 L.Ed.2d 38 (1957).
discussed
Cited "see"
Delta Steamship Lines, Inc. v. Avondale Shipyards, Inc.
(2×)
See Moore-McCormack Lines, Inc. v. The ESSO CAMDEN, 244 F.2d 198 , 202 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 355 U.S. 822 , 78 S.Ct. 29 , 2 L.Ed.2d 37 (1957); Skou v. United States, 526 F.2d 293, 298 (5th Cir.1976).
cited
Cited "see"
Construction Aggregate Transport, Inc. v. Florida Rock Industries, Inc.
See Packard Motor Car Co. v. Webster Motor Car Co., 243 F.2d 418, 420 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 355 U.S. 822 , 78 S.Ct. 29 , 2 L.Ed.2d 38 (1957).
cited
Cited "see"
Construction Aggregate Transport, Inc. v. Florida Rock Industries, Inc.
See Packard Motor Car Co. v. Webster Motor Car Co., 243 F.2d 418, 420 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 355 U.S. 822 , 78 S.Ct. 29 , 2 L.Ed.2d 38 (1957).
discussed
Cited "see"
By's Chartering Service, Inc. v. Interstate Insurance Company
(2×)
See Moore-McCormack Lines, Inc. v. The Esso Camden, 244 F.2d 198 , 203 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 355 U.S. 822 , 78 S.Ct. 29 , 2 L.Ed.2d 37 (1957).
cited
Cited "see"
J. H. Rutter Rex Manufacturing Company, Inc., Petitioner-Cross v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent-Cross
See N.L.R.B. v. Southern Silk Mills, 6 Cir. 1957, 242 F. 2d 697 , cert. denied, 355 U.S. 821 , 78 S. Ct. 28 , 2 L.Ed.2d 37 .
examined
Cited "see"
National Labor Relations Board v. The Madison Courier, Inc.
(5×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Southern Silk Mills, Inc., 116 NLRB 769 , 773 (1956), remanded, 242 F.2d 697 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 355 U.S. 821 , 78 S.Ct. 28 , 2 L.Ed.2d 37 (1957).
discussed
Cited "see"
Lou Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.
See United States v. Parke, Davis & Co., 1960, 362 U.S. 29, 36-47 , 80 S.Ct. 503 , 4 L.Ed.2d 505 . 46 Packard Motor Car Co. v. Webster Motor Car Co., 1957, 100 U.S.App.D.C. 161 , 243 F.2d 418 , certiorari denied, 355 U.S. 822 , 78 S.Ct. 29 , 2 L.Ed.2d 38 , is not dispositive here.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Brady v. Thurston Motor Lines, Inc.
See, e.g., NLRB v. Southern Silk Mills, 242 F.2d 697, 700 (6th Cir.1957), cert. denied, 355 U.S. 821 , 78 S.Ct. 28 , 2 L.Ed.2d 37 (1957); NLRB v. Moss Planning Mill Co., 224 F.2d 702, 705 (4th Cir.1955). 1 The period of back pay entitlement continues to run during the employment at a lower paying job, with any earnings deducted from a subsequent back pay award.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Brady v. Thurston Motor Lines, Inc.
See, e.g., NLRB v. Southern Silk Mills, 242 F.2d 697, 700 (6th Cir.1957), cert. denied, 355 U.S. 821 , 78 S.Ct. 28 , 2 L.Ed.2d 37 (1957); NLRB v. Moss Planning Mill Co., 224 F.2d 702, 705 (4th Cir.1955). 1 The period of back pay entitlement continues to run during the employment at a lower paying job, with any earnings deducted from a subsequent back pay award.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Black Gold, Ltd. v. Rockwool Industries, Inc.
See, e.g., Webster Motor Car Co. v. Packard Motor Car Co., 166 F.Supp. 865 (D.D.C.1955), rev’d & cross appeal re attorney’s fees dismissed as moot, 243 F.2d 418 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 355 U.S. 822 , 78 S.Ct. 29 , 2 L.Ed.2d 38 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Knutson v. Daily Review, Inc.
See e. g., Webster Motor Car Co. v. Packard Motor Car Co., 166 F.Supp. 865 (D.D.C.1955), rev’d and cross appeal concerning attorney’s fees dismissed as moot, 100 U.S.App.D.C. 161 , 243 F.2d 418 (1957), cert. denied, 355 U.S. 822 , 78 S.Ct. 29 , 2 L.Ed.2d 38 (1957).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Liggett & Myers, Incorporated v. Federal Trade Commission
See, e. g., Packard Motor Car Co. v. Webster Motor Car Co., 100 U.S.App.D.C. 161 , 243 F.2d 418, 420 (1957), cert. denied, 355 U.S. 822 , 78 S.Ct. 29 , 2 L.Ed.2d 38 (1957) (all automobiles).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Beckman v. Walter Kidde & Company
Compare United States v. General Motors Corp., 384 U.S. 127 , 86 S.Ct. 1321 , 16 L.Ed.2d 415 (1966) with Packard Motor Car Company v. Webster Motor Car Co., 100 U.S.App.D.C., 161 , 243 F.2d 418 (1957), cert, denied, 355 U.S. 822 , 78 S.Ct. 29 , 2 L.Ed.2d 38 (1957). 8 Thus the court is constrained to conclude that no genuine issue as to any material fact exists with respect to the claimed violations of Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act and that, predicated upon his complaint and affidavits, Beck-man is not entitled to the luxury of a trial upon non-existent issues.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Metropolitan Liquor Company v. Heublein, Inc.
See also, Packard Motor Car Co. v. Webster Motor Car Co., 100 U.S.App.D.C. 161 , 243 F.2d 418 (1957), cert. den. 355 U.S. 822 , 78 S.Ct. 29 , 2 L.Ed.2d 38 (1957) ; Sehwing Motor Co. v. Hudson Sales Corp., 138 F.Supp. 899 (D.Md.1956), aff’d per curiam, 239 F.2d 176 (4th Cir. 1956), cert. den. 355 U.S. 823 , 78 S.Ct. 30 , 2 L.Ed.2d 38 (1957).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bernard Susser v. Carvel Corporation, Carvel Dari-Freeze Stores, Inc., Carvel Stores Realty Corporation, and Eight Other Cases
(2×)
See, e. g., Packard Motor Car Co. v. Webster Motor Car Co., 100 U.S.App.D.C. 161 , 243 F.2d 418 , cert. denied, 355 U.S. 822 , 78 S.Ct. 29 , 2 L.Ed.2d 38 (1957).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Albert H. Cayne Equipment Corp. v. Union Asbestos & Rubber Co.
See, e. g., Packard Motor Car Co. v. Webster Motor Car Co., 100 U.S.App.D.C. 161 , 243 F.2d 418 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 355 U.S. 822 , 78 S.Ct. 29 , 2 L.Ed.2d 38 (1957); Schwing Motor Co. v. Hudson Sales Corp., 138 F.Supp. 899 (D.Md.), aff’d on opinion below, 239 F.2d 176 (4th Cir. 1956), cert. denied, 355 U.S. 823 , 78 S. Ct. 30 , 2 L.Ed.2d 38 (1957); Hudson Sales Corp. v. Waldrip, 211 F.2d 268 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 348 U.S. 821 , 75 S.Ct. 34 , 99 L.Ed. 648 (1954); Fargo Glass & Paint Co. v. Globe American Corp., 201 F.2d 534 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 345 U.S. 942 , 73 S.Ct. 833 , 97 …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
California Beverage & Supply Co. v. Distillers Distributing Corp.
See also Packard Motor Co. v. Webster Motor Car Co., 243 F.2d 418 , cert, denied, Webster Motor Car Co. v. Packard Motor Car Co., 355 U.S. 822 [ 78 S.Ct. 29 , 2 L.Ed.2d 38 ]; Schwing Motor Co. v. Hudson Sales Corp., 138 F.Supp. 899 , aff’d 239 E.2d 176, cert, denied, 355 U.S. 823 [ 78 S.Ct. 30 , 2 L.Ed.2d 38 ], both of which are relied upon in the Milton ease. * Assigned by Chairman of Judicial Council.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Lannom Manufacturing Co., Inc.
v.
National Labor Relations Board
v.
National Labor Relations Board
No. 211.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 14, 1957.
Judson Harwood for petitioner. Solicitor General Rankin, Jerome D. Fenton, Stephen Leonard and Dominick L. Manoli for the National Labor Relations Board, and Harold I. Cammer for the Amalgamated Meat Cutters & Butcher Workmen of North America, AFL-CIO, respondents.
Published
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.