green
Positive treatment
4.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 1958 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1958
1992
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 21 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
The Interface Group, Inc. v. Massachusetts Port Authority
See Packard Motor Car Co. v. Webster Motor Car Co., 243 F.2d 418 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 355 U.S. 822 , 78 S.Ct. 29 , 2 L.Ed.2d 38 (1957).
cited
Cited "see"
Construction Aggregate Transport, Inc. v. Florida Rock Industries, Inc.
See Packard Motor Car Co. v. Webster Motor Car Co., 243 F.2d 418, 420 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 355 U.S. 822 , 78 S.Ct. 29 , 2 L.Ed.2d 38 (1957).
cited
Cited "see"
Construction Aggregate Transport, Inc. v. Florida Rock Industries, Inc.
See Packard Motor Car Co. v. Webster Motor Car Co., 243 F.2d 418, 420 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 355 U.S. 822 , 78 S.Ct. 29 , 2 L.Ed.2d 38 (1957).
discussed
Cited "see"
Washington Petroleum & Supply Co. v. Girard Bank
See Elliott & Sons, Inc. v. Nuodex Products Co., 243 F.2d 116, 119 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 355 U.S. 823 , 78 S.Ct. 30 , 2 L.Ed.2d 38 (1957); cf. Leroy v. Great Western United Corp., 443 U.S. 173, 180 , 99 S.Ct. 2710, 2714 , 61 L.Ed.2d 464 (1979) (“when there is a sound prudential justification for doing so, ... a court may reverse the normal order of considering personal jurisdiction and venue.”) Therefore, we will proceed to a discussion of that issue.
cited
Cited "see"
Cruttenden v. Mantura
See State v. MacPherson, 62 N.M. 308 , 309 P.2d 981 , cert. denied, 355 U.S. 825 , 78 S.Ct. 32 , 2 L.Ed.2d 39 (1957).
discussed
Cited "see"
Peerless Dental Supply Co. v. Weber Dental Manufacturing Co.
Reversing a $190,-000 jury verdict for plaintiff, the Dis *290 trict of Columbia Circuit noted that the facts that other dealers in the same product were eliminated and that one of the competing dealers had requested the arrangement did not make it illegal; for these were the natural characteristics of the birth of an exclusive dealership, itself not illegal under the Sherman Act, id. at 421; accord, Schwing Motor Co. v. Hudson Sales Co., 138 F.Supp. 899 (D.Md.), aff’d, 239 F.2d 176 (4th Cir. 1956), cert. denied, 355 U.S. 823 , 78 S.Ct. 30 , 2 L.Ed.2d 38 (1957).
discussed
Cited "see"
Henderson Clay Products v. United States
(2×)
See United States v. Cherokee Brick and Tile Co., 5 Cir., 1955, 218 F.2d 424 , United States v. Merry Brothers Brick and Tile Company, 5 Cir. 1957, 247 F.2d 708 , cert. denied 1957, 355 U.S. 824 , 78 S.Ct. 31 , 2 L.Ed.2d 38 . 5 On September 26, 1961, Congress passed a statute which offered to brick and tile manufacturers an option to compute their taxes in a different manner.
discussed
Cited "see"
Goldberg v. Forcum-Lannom, Inc.
See Archer v. Brown & Root, Inc., 241 F.2d 663 (5th Cir. 1957), cert. denied, 355 U.S. 825 , 78 S.Ct. 33 , 2 L.Ed.2d 39 , for a similar interpretation of the effect of Vollmer, wherein the court held that the supplying of a eon-tractor building a causeway, where none had existed before, across Lake Pontchartrain, was production of goods for commerce.
discussed
Cited "see"
Lou Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.
See United States v. Parke, Davis & Co., 1960, 362 U.S. 29, 36-47 , 80 S.Ct. 503 , 4 L.Ed.2d 505 . 46 Packard Motor Car Co. v. Webster Motor Car Co., 1957, 100 U.S.App.D.C. 161 , 243 F.2d 418 , certiorari denied, 355 U.S. 822 , 78 S.Ct. 29 , 2 L.Ed.2d 38 , is not dispositive here.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Terry's Floor Fashions, Inc. v. Burlington Industries, Inc. Lees Carpets, a Division of Burlington Industries, Inc. And Eatman's Carpets, Inc.
(2×)
See, e.g., Schwing, Motor Co. v. Hudson Sales Corporation, 138 F.Supp. 899 (D.Md.), aff'd, 239 F.2d 176 (4 Cir.1956), cert. denied, 355 U.S. 823 , 78 S.Ct. 30 , 2 L.Ed.2d 38 (1957); Packard Motor Car Co. v. Webster Motor Car Co., 243 F.2d 418 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 355 U.S. 823 , 78 S.Ct. 30 , 2 L.Ed.2d 38 (1957) (rule of reason applied where car manufacturer terminated plaintiff dealer to make another dealer its sole outlet in Baltimore area).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Black Gold, Ltd. v. Rockwool Industries, Inc.
See, e.g., Webster Motor Car Co. v. Packard Motor Car Co., 166 F.Supp. 865 (D.D.C.1955), rev’d & cross appeal re attorney’s fees dismissed as moot, 243 F.2d 418 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 355 U.S. 822 , 78 S.Ct. 29 , 2 L.Ed.2d 38 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Knutson v. Daily Review, Inc.
See e. g., Webster Motor Car Co. v. Packard Motor Car Co., 166 F.Supp. 865 (D.D.C.1955), rev’d and cross appeal concerning attorney’s fees dismissed as moot, 100 U.S.App.D.C. 161 , 243 F.2d 418 (1957), cert. denied, 355 U.S. 822 , 78 S.Ct. 29 , 2 L.Ed.2d 38 (1957).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Cernuto, Inc. v. United Cabinet Corp.
See also Schwing Motor Co. v. Hudson Sales Corp., 138 F.Supp. 899 (D.Md.), aff’d, 239 F.2d 176 (4th Cir. 1956), cert. denied, 355 U.S. 823 , 78 S.Ct. 30 , 2 L.Ed.2d 38 (1957). . 579 F.2d 126 (2d Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 99 S.Ct. 340 , 58 L.Ed.2d 338 (1978). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Cernuto, Incorporated v. United Cabinet Corporation
See also Schwing Motor Co. v. Hudson Sales Corp., 138 F.Supp. 899 (D.Md.), Aff'd, 239 F.2d 176 (4th Cir. 1956), Cert. denied, 355 U.S. 823 , 78 S.Ct. 30 , 2 L.Ed.2d 38 (1957) 23 579 F.2d 126 (2d Cir.) (En banc ), Cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 99 S.Ct. 340 , 58 L.Ed.2d 338 (1978) 24 Id. 130 25 On the other hand, if United acted in pursuit of its own policy, but that policy was itself a form of resale price maintenance, involving other parties in its enforcement, it might constitute a Per se violation of the Act under United States v. Parke, Davis & Co., 362 U.S. 29 , 80 S.Ct. 503 , 4 L.Ed.2d 505…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Liggett & Myers, Incorporated v. Federal Trade Commission
See, e. g., Packard Motor Car Co. v. Webster Motor Car Co., 100 U.S.App.D.C. 161 , 243 F.2d 418, 420 (1957), cert. denied, 355 U.S. 822 , 78 S.Ct. 29 , 2 L.Ed.2d 38 (1957) (all automobiles).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Beckman v. Walter Kidde & Company
Compare United States v. General Motors Corp., 384 U.S. 127 , 86 S.Ct. 1321 , 16 L.Ed.2d 415 (1966) with Packard Motor Car Company v. Webster Motor Car Co., 100 U.S.App.D.C., 161 , 243 F.2d 418 (1957), cert, denied, 355 U.S. 822 , 78 S.Ct. 29 , 2 L.Ed.2d 38 (1957). 8 Thus the court is constrained to conclude that no genuine issue as to any material fact exists with respect to the claimed violations of Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act and that, predicated upon his complaint and affidavits, Beck-man is not entitled to the luxury of a trial upon non-existent issues.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Metropolitan Liquor Company v. Heublein, Inc.
See also, Packard Motor Car Co. v. Webster Motor Car Co., 100 U.S.App.D.C. 161 , 243 F.2d 418 (1957), cert. den. 355 U.S. 822 , 78 S.Ct. 29 , 2 L.Ed.2d 38 (1957) ; Sehwing Motor Co. v. Hudson Sales Corp., 138 F.Supp. 899 (D.Md.1956), aff’d per curiam, 239 F.2d 176 (4th Cir. 1956), cert. den. 355 U.S. 823 , 78 S.Ct. 30 , 2 L.Ed.2d 38 (1957).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Marc Belding Anderson v. General Lewis B. Hershey, National Director, Selective Service System
(2×)
See, e. g., Tamarkin v. Selective Service Local Draft Board No. 47, 243 F.2d 108, 109 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 355 U.S. 825 , 78 S.Ct. 33 , 2 L.Ed.2d 39 (1957) (challenge to Selective Service physical examination procedure) ; Muhammad Ali v. Breathitt, 268 F.Supp. 63 (W.D.Ky.1967), stay denied, sub nom., Muhammad Ali v. Gordon, 386 U.S. 1002 , 87 S.Ct. 1365 , 18 L.Ed.2d 451 (1967) (exclusion of negroes from local boards) ; Boyd v. Clark, 287 F.Supp. 561 (S.D.N.Y.1968), aff’d, 393 U.S. 316 , 89 S.Ct. 553 , 21 L.Ed.2d 511 (1969) (challenge of constitutionality of student deferment). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bernard Susser v. Carvel Corporation, Carvel Dari-Freeze Stores, Inc., Carvel Stores Realty Corporation, and Eight Other Cases
(2×)
See, e. g., Packard Motor Car Co. v. Webster Motor Car Co., 100 U.S.App.D.C. 161 , 243 F.2d 418 , cert. denied, 355 U.S. 822 , 78 S.Ct. 29 , 2 L.Ed.2d 38 (1957).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Albert H. Cayne Equipment Corp. v. Union Asbestos & Rubber Co.
See, e. g., Packard Motor Car Co. v. Webster Motor Car Co., 100 U.S.App.D.C. 161 , 243 F.2d 418 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 355 U.S. 822 , 78 S.Ct. 29 , 2 L.Ed.2d 38 (1957); Schwing Motor Co. v. Hudson Sales Corp., 138 F.Supp. 899 (D.Md.), aff’d on opinion below, 239 F.2d 176 (4th Cir. 1956), cert. denied, 355 U.S. 823 , 78 S. Ct. 30 , 2 L.Ed.2d 38 (1957); Hudson Sales Corp. v. Waldrip, 211 F.2d 268 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 348 U.S. 821 , 75 S.Ct. 34 , 99 L.Ed. 648 (1954); Fargo Glass & Paint Co. v. Globe American Corp., 201 F.2d 534 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 345 U.S. 942 , 73 S.Ct. 833 , 97 …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
California Beverage & Supply Co. v. Distillers Distributing Corp.
See also Packard Motor Co. v. Webster Motor Car Co., 243 F.2d 418 , cert, denied, Webster Motor Car Co. v. Packard Motor Car Co., 355 U.S. 822 [ 78 S.Ct. 29 , 2 L.Ed.2d 38 ]; Schwing Motor Co. v. Hudson Sales Corp., 138 F.Supp. 899 , aff’d 239 E.2d 176, cert, denied, 355 U.S. 823 [ 78 S.Ct. 30 , 2 L.Ed.2d 38 ], both of which are relied upon in the Milton ease. * Assigned by Chairman of Judicial Council.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Citizens Bank & Trust Co., Administrator
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 222.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 14, 1957.
Camden R. McAtee for petitioner. Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Doub and Paul A. Sweeney for the United States.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Certiorari denied.