Swain v. MissisSippi Valley Barge Line Co., 355 U.S. 933 (1958). · Go Syfert
Search
Swain v. MissisSippi Valley Barge Line Co., 355 U.S. 933 (1958). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
70 citation events across 37 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Keatts (usarmymilrev, 1985-08-22)
Treatment trajectory · 1959 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1959 1992 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited as authority (rule) United States v. Keatts
usarmymilrev · 1985 · confidence medium
Id. at 511-512 [footnotes omitted].
cited Cited as authority (rule) Edward Nekolny, Patrick Dumas, and Maria L. Dahms v. Ann B. Painter, Individually and as Supervisor of Lyons Township, Defendant
7th Cir. · 1981 · confidence medium
Murphy Auto Parts Co. v. Ball, 249 F.2d 508 , 510 (D.C.Cir. 1957), cert. denied, 355 U.S. 932 , 78 S.ct. 413, 2 L.Ed.2d 415 (1958).
discussed Cited "see" Shuck v. Texaco Refining & Marketing, Inc.
Ariz. Ct. App. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high
See Murphy Auto Parts Co. v. Ball, 249 F.2d 508 , 512 (D.C.Cir. 1957) (holding that the declarant’s statement that he was on an errand for his employer was properly admitted as an excited utterance to prove that he was in fact engaged in his employer’s business at the time of a collision with a pedestrian), cert. denied, 355 U.S. 932 , 78 S.Ct. 413 , 2 L.Ed.2d 415 (1958).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Thomas N. Moore
7th Cir. · 1986 · signal: see · confidence high
See Murphy Auto Parts Co. v. Ball, 249 F.2d 508 , 511-12 (D.C.Cir.1957), ce rt. denied, 355 U.S. 932 , 78 S.Ct. 413 , 2 L.Ed.2d 415 (1958).
cited Cited "see" State v. Savant
Ariz. Ct. App. · 1985 · signal: see · confidence high
See Murphy Auto Parts Co. v. Ball, 249 F.2d 508 (D.C.Cir.1957), cert. denied, 355 U.S. 932 , 78 S.Ct. 413 , 2 L.Ed.2d 415 (1958).
cited Cited "see" International Union of Electrical Workers v. General Electric Co.
Conn. · 1961 · signal: see · confidence high
See McCarroll v. Los Angeles County District Council of Carpenters, 49 Cal. 2d 45, 63, 64, 69 , 315 P.2d 322 , cert. denied, 355 U.S. 932 , 78 S. Ct. 413 , 2 L.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Harrell
Md. · 1997 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare People v. Burton, 433 Mich. 268 , 445 N.W.2d 133, 138 (1989) (noting a third requirement that the statement “ ‘must relate to the circumstances of the startling occasion’” in order for the excited utterance exception to apply) (quoting People v. Gee, 406 Mich. 279 , 278 N.W.2d 304, 305 (1979)) and State v. Terry, 10 Wash.App. 874 , 520 P.2d 1397, 1401 (1974)(noting that the statement must relate to the “main event,” or the subject of the lawsuit) with Murphy Auto Parts Co. v. Ball, 249 F.2d 508 , 511 (D.C.Cir.1957) (noting that “ ‘the relationship of the statement to th…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Swain, Administratrix
v.
Mississippi Valley Barge Line Co.
No. 205,.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 27, 1958.
355 U.S. 933
Louis C. Glasso for petitioner.
Cited by 3 opinions  |  Published

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.