green
Positive treatment
6.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 1958 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1958
1992
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Township of Middletown v. Simon
(2×)
See State by State Highway Comm’r v. Cooper, 24 N.J. 261, 267-68 , 131 A.2d 756 , cert. denied, 355 U.S. 829 , 78 S.Ct. 41 , 2 L.Ed.2d 42 (1957).
cited
Cited "see"
Boat Dianne Lynn, Inc. v. C & N FISHING CORP.
Id; see Hobart v. O’Brien, 243 F.2d 735, 745 (1st Cir.), cert denied, 355 U.S. 830 , 78 S.Ct. 42 , 2 L.Ed.2d 42 (1957).
discussed
Cited "see"
49 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1139, 48 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 38,456, 27 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 198 Iver J. Freeman v. Package MacHinery Company
See Hobart v. O'Brien, 243 F.2d 735, 745 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 355 U.S. 830 , 78 S.Ct. 42 , 2 L.Ed.2d 42 (1957) (Mass.Gen.L. ch. 231, Sec. 6B, quoted supra note 6, comprises substantive state law applicable in diversity); Harmon v. Clark Equipment Co., 657 F.Supp. 873, 874 (D.Me.1987) (to like effect).
discussed
Cited "see"
Freeman v. Package Machinery Co.
See Hobart v. O'Brien, 243 F.2d 735, 745 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 355 U.S. 830 , 78 S.Ct. 42 , 2 L.Ed.2d 42 (1957) (Mass.Gen.L. ch. 231, § 6B, quoted supra note 6, comprises substantive state law applicable in diversity); Harmon v. Clark Equipment Co., 657 F.Supp. 873, 874 (D.Me.1987) (to like effect).
discussed
Cited "see"
Lionel Aubin v. Stanley Fudala
See Hobart v. O’Brien, 243 F.2d 735, 745 (1st Cir.) (diversity case), cert. denied, 355 U.S. 830 , 78 S.Ct. 42 , 2 L.Ed.2d 42 (1957); Mallis v. Bankers Trust Co., 717 F.2d 683 , 692 n. 13 (2d Cir.1983) (state law governs award of prejudgment interest on pendent state law claims even if federal claims provide basis for jurisdiction); compare Furtado v. Bishop, 604 F.2d 80, 97 (1st Cir.1979) (federal rule governs award of prejudgment interest on federal claims in § 1983 suit), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1035 , 100 S.Ct. 710 , 62 L.Ed.2d 672 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Mountain View Pharmacy v. Abbott Laboratories
On the other hand a complaint dealing with a more complex matter, as in an antitrust action, an action to enjoin enforcement of an unconstitutional statute, an inter-pleader suit, or a stockholder’s action will be more extended and may require more particularity.” 2A Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 8.13, at 8-124, 125 (2d ed. 1979); accord, Atwood v. Humble Oil & Refining Co., 243 F.2d 885, 889 (5th Cir. 1957), cert. denied, 355 U.S. 829 , 78 S.Ct. 41 , 2 L.Ed.2d 42 (1959).
cited
Cited "see"
Margaret FISHER, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. Walter FLYNN, Etc., Et Al., Defendants, Appellees
See Hobart v. O'Brien, 243 F.2d 735, 744 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 355 U.S. 830 , 78 S.Ct. 42 , 2 L.Ed.2d 42 (1957); 9 Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 210.08, at 1639 (2d ed. 1948).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Lee A. Lanier
See Hobart v. O’Brien, 243 F.2d 735, 744 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 355 U.S. 830 , 78 S.Ct. 42 , 2 L.Ed.2d 42 (1957).
cited
Cited "see"
Jersey City Redevelopment Agency v. Kugler
See State by State Highway Com’r v. Cooper, 24 N. J. 261, cert. den. 355 U. S. 829 , 78 S. Ct. 41 , 2 L.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Township of South Hackensack
See State v. Cooper, 24 N. J. 261, 269 (1957), cert. den. 355 U. S. 829 , 78 S. Ct. 41 , 2 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Paul S. Segal v. Gilbert Color Systems, Inc.
Compare Sanabria v. International Longshoremen’s Association Local 1575, 597 F.2d 312, 313-14 (1st Cir.1979) (state prejudgment interest rule inapplicable to fair representation case brought under 29 U.S.C. § 185 ) with Hobart v. O'Brien, 243 F.2d 735, 744-45 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 355 U.S. 830 , 78 S.Ct. 42 , 2 L.Ed.2d 42 (1957) (prejudgment interest under state law available in diversity action).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Waterman Steamship Corporation v. Ramon Rodriguez Colon, Ramon Rodriguez Colon v. Waterman Steamship Corporation
Compare Hobart v. O’Brien, 1 Cir., 1957, 243 F.2d 735, 740 , certiorari denied 355 U.S. 830 , 78 S.Ct. 42 , 2 L.Ed. 2d 42 ; Jay v. Chicago Bridge & Iron Co., 10 Cir., 1945, 150 F.2d 247, 249 ; Crab Orchard Imp.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Humble Oil & Refining Co.
v.
Atwood
v.
Atwood
No. 266.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 14, 1957.
Felix A. Raymer and Nelson Jones for petitioner. David C. Bland, Jr. for respondents.
Published
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.