green
Positive treatment
3.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1970 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1970
1998
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "but see"
United States v. Chestnut
But see United States v. Taller, 394 F.2d 435, 437-38 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 839 , 89 S.Ct. 115 , 21 L.Ed.2d 109 (1968).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Keshabhai Patel v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
Ameeriar v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, 438 F.2d 1028 ,1033 (3d Cir.) (en banc), cert. dismissed, 404 U.S. 801 , 92 S.Ct. 21 , 30 L.Ed.2d 34 (1971); Chen v. Foley, 385 F.2d 929, 935-36 (6th Cir.1967), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 838 , 89 S.Ct. 115 , 21 L.Ed.2d 109 *243 (1968).
cited
Cited "see"
McMILLIAN v. FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION
Accord Argonaut Savings and Loan Ass'n v. FDIC, 392 F.2d 195, 197 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 839 , 89 S.Ct. 116 , 21 L.Ed.2d 110 (1968).
cited
Cited "see"
McMillian v. Federal Deposit Insurance
Accord Argonaut Savings and Loan Ass’n v. FDIC, 392 F.2d 195, 197 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 839 , 89 S.Ct. 116 , 21 L.Ed.2d 110 (1968).
discussed
Cited "see"
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver for Penn Square Bank, N.A. v. Myron J. Palermo
Federal law controls the rights and liabilities of the FDIC in its capacity as receiver of a national bank. 12 U.S.C. § 1819 (“All suits of a civil nature at common law or in equity to which the [FDIC] shall be a party shall be deemed to arise under the laws of the United States____”); see Argonaut Savings & Loan Assoc. v. FDIC, 392 F.2d 195, 197 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 839 , 89 S.Ct. 116 , 21 L.Ed.2d 110 (1968); 1A J.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Tuthill
(2×)
Nor did the modification `materially increase[]' the risk the bondsman accepted."); State v. Vaughn, 11 P.3d 211, 214-15 (Okla.2000) (the prosecution's decision to add new charges, arising from the original transaction, which increased defendant's maximum possible sentence "did not materially increase the Bondsman's bargained-for risk"); see also United States v. Egan, 394 F. 2d 262, 265-66 (2d Cir.) (an order that originally required defendant to report daily to the marshal, later modified to require reporting at ten day intervals, did not enlarge the conditions of bail or enhance the chances…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Bank One v. Prudential Insurance
See, e.g., Argonaut Sav. & Loan Ass'n v. FDIC, 392 F.2d 195, 197 (9th Cir.) (construing Kennedy as authority interpreting § 194), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 839 , 89 S.Ct. 116 , 21 L.Ed.2d 110 (1968). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
BANK ONE, TX, NA v. Prudential Ins. Co. of Amer.
See, e.g., Argonaut Sav. & Loan Ass'n v. FDIC, 392 F.2d 195, 197 (9th Cir.) (construing Kennedy as authority interpreting § 194), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 839 , 89 S.Ct. 116 , 21 L.Ed.2d 110 (1968). [20] The per curiam affirmance of the Fifth Circuit is reported in a table at 575 F.2d 879 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Citizens State Bank of Lometa v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as Receiver of North Central National Bank
See also, Argonaut Savings & Loan Ass'n v. FDIC, 392 F.2d 195, 197 (9th Cir.), cert denied, 393 U.S. 839 , 89 S.Ct. 116 , 21 L.Ed.2d 110 (1968), FDIC v. Grella, 553 F.2d 258, 262 (2nd Cir.1977), each case dealing with an exercise of an option to obtain liquidated damages for the loss of future rent and turning on the "new contract” principle.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Alexander E. Marabelles
(2×)
In addition to the above evidence, the Government cites case law indicating that: (1) in “specific items” cases, the Government has no burden to follow all “reasonable leads” as it does in circumstantial evidence (net worth) cases, United States v. Lawhon, 499 F.2d 352, 356-57 (5th Cir.1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1121 , 95 S.Ct. 804 , 42 L.Ed.2d 820 (1975); and (2) the burden is on the defendant to prove that he had allowable deductions that were not shown in his return, once the Government establishes unreported income and allows the deductions claimed by the defendant in this retur…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Wray
(2×)
Stuyvesant Insurance Co. v. United States, 410 F.2d 524, 526 (8th Cir. 1969); United States v. Caro, 56 F.R.D. 16, 19 (S.D.Fla.1972); see also, United States v. Egan, 394 F. 2d 262, 267 (2nd Cir. 1968), cert. denied sub nom., Stuyvesant Insurance Co. v. United States, 393 U.S. 838 , 89 S.Ct. 116 , 21 L.Ed.2d 109 (1968).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Stuyvesant Insurance Co.
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 252.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 14, 1968.
Joseph I. Stone for petitioner., Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg, and Robert G. Maysack for the United States.
Cited by 4 opinions | Published
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.