Stiles v. United States, 393 U.S. 219 (1968). · Go Syfert
Stiles v. United States, 393 U.S. 219 (1968). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
22 citation events (2 in the last 25 years) across 14 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Hamlin Ex Rel. Hamlin v. City of Peekskill Board of Education (nysd, 2005-07-13)
Treatment trajectory · 1968 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1968 1997 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Hamlin Ex Rel. Hamlin v. City of Peekskill Board of Education
S.D.N.Y. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See South Carolina State Board of Education v. Brown, 393 U.S. 222 , 89 S.Ct. 449 , 21 L.Ed.2d 391 (1968); Louisiana Education Comm’n v. Poindexter, 393 U.S. 17 , 89 S.Ct. 48 , 21 L.Ed.2d 16 (1968); Griffin v. County School Board of Prince Edward County, 377 U.S. 218 , 84 S.Ct. 1226 , 12 L.Ed.2d 256 (1964). 5 .
discussed Cited "see" Coffey v. State Educational Finance Commission
S.D. Miss. · 1969 · signal: see · confidence high
See Brown v. South Carolina State Bd. of Educ., Civil No. AC-1655 (D.S.C., May 31, 1968) appeal docketed 393 U.S. 222 , 89 S.Ct. 449 , 21 L.Ed.2d 391 (1968) ; Poindexter v. Louisiana Financial Assistance Comm’n, 296 F.Supp. 686 (E.D.La., March 19, 1968), aff’d 393 U.S. 17 , 89 S.Ct. 48 , 21 L.Ed.2d 16 (1968) ; Poindexter v. Louisiana Financial Assistance Comm’n, 275 F.Supp. 833 (E.D.La.1967), aff’d 389 U.S. 571 , 88 S.Ct. 693 , 19 L.Ed.2d 780 (1968); Lee v. Macon County Bd. of Educ., 267 F.Supp. 458 (M.D.Ala.1967); Griffin v. State Bd. of Educ., 239 F.Supp. 560 (E.D.Va.1965) ; Lee v. M…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STILES
v.
UNITED STATES
No. 74.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 9, 1968.
393 U.S. 219
Charles J. Rogers, Jr., by appointment of the Court, post, p. 813, argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner., Solicitor General Griswold argued the cause for the United States. With him on the brief were Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Jerome M. Feit, and Lawrence P. Cohen.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published
Per Curiam.

The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted.