DuVernay v. United States, 394 U.S. 309 (1969). · Go Syfert
Search
DuVernay v. United States, 394 U.S. 309 (1969). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
111 citation events across 18 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Gerald Dewayne McDuffie (ca5, 1971-05-11)
Treatment trajectory · 1969 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1969 1997 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
examined Cited "see" United States v. Gerald Dewayne McDuffie (3×)
5th Cir. · 1971 · signal: see · confidence high
See DuVernay v. United States, 394 F.2d 979 (5th Cir. 1968), affd. by an equally divided Court, 394 U.S. 309 , 89 S.Ct. 1186 , 22 L.Ed.2d 306 (1969).
examined Cited "see" United States v. Robert Lee Sears (3×)
5th Cir. · 1970 · signal: see · confidence high
See DuVernay v. United States, 394 F.2d 979 (5th Cir. 1968), aff’d by an equally divided Court, 394 U.S. 309 , 89 S.Ct. 1186 , 22 L.Ed.2d 306 (1969).
examined Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Krueger (3×)
N.D. Ill. · 1970 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also DuVernay v. United States, 394 F.2d 979 , 983 at n. 6 (5th Cir. 1968), aff’d 394 U.S. 309 , 89 S.Ct. 1186 , 22 L.Ed.2d 306 (1969); United States v. Richmond, 274 F.Supp. 43 (C.D.Cal.1967).
examined Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Branigan (3×)
S.D.N.Y. · 1969 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare DuVernay v. United States, 394 U.S. 309 , 89 S.Ct. 1186 , 22 L.Ed.2d 306 (1969), aff’g by an equally divided Court 394 F.2d 979 (5th Cir. 1968) ; Oestereich v. Selective Service System Local Bd. No. 11, 393 U.S. 233, 251 , 89 S.Ct. 414 , 21 L.Ed.2d 402 (1968) (Stewart, J., dissenting) ; Estep v. United States, 327 U.S. 114, 115-116 , 66 S.Ct. 423 , 90 L.Ed. 567 (1946); Falbo v. United States, 320 U.S. 549, 554-555 , 64 S.Ct. 346 , 88 L.Ed. 305 (1944) ; Breen v. Selective Service Local Bd. No. 16, 406 F.2d 636 (2d Cir. 1969) ; Yeater v. United States, 397 F.2d 975, 976 (9th Cir. 1968)…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
DuVERNAY
v.
UNITED STATES.
814.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 19, 1969.
394 U.S. 309
Per Curiam.
Cited by 17 opinions  |  Published
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT.

Benjamin E. Smith argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were Arthur Kinoy and Morton Stavis.

John S. Martin, Jr., argued the cause for the United States. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Wilson, and Philip R. Monahan.

Ann Fagan Ginger filed a brief for the National Lawyers Guild as amicus curiae urging reversal.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.

MR. JUSTICE FORTAS took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.