green
Positive treatment
3.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1959 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1959
1992
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Wellogix, Inc. v. Accenture, LLP
See Hyde Corp. v. Huffines, 158 Tex. 566 , 314 S.W.2d 763, 776 (1958) (adopting Restatement of Torts § 757 (1939)), cert. denied, 358 U.S. 898 , 79 S.Ct. 223 , 3 L.Ed.2d 148 .
cited
Cited "see"
Seatrax, Inc. v. Sonbeck International, Inc.
See id. (citing Hyde Corp. v. Huffines, 158 Tex. 566 , 314 S.W.2d 763, 776 (Tex.), cert. denied, 358 U.S. 898 , 79 S.Ct. 223 , 3 L.Ed.2d 148 (1958)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Sassen v. Tanglegrove Townhouse Condominium Ass'n
See Hyde Corp. v. Huffines, 158 Tex. 566 , 314 S.W.2d 763 (1958), cert. denied, 358 U.S. 898 , 79 S.Ct. 223 , 3 L.Ed.2d 148 (1958); InterFirst Bank Dallas, N.A. v. Risser, 739 S.W.2d 882 (Tex.App.-Texarkana 1987, no writ); Crutcher-Rolfs-Cummings, Inc. v. Ballard, 540 S.W.2d 380 ; Restatement (Seoond) of Agency §§ 399, 400, 401 cmt. a (1958).
cited
Cited "see"
People v. Gilbert
Accord, People v. Malmenato (1958), 14 Ill. 2d 52 , 150 N.E.2d 806 , cert. denied (1958), 358 U.S. 899 , 3 L.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Honorable Willis W. Ritter, Chief Judge of the United States District Courtfor the District of Utah
See 358 U.S. 899 , 79 S.Ct. 222 , 3 L.Ed.2d 148 (1958).
cited
Cited "see"
McKasson v. Zimmer Manufacturing Co.
See, People v. Malmenato, 14 Ill.2d 52, 63-65 (1958), cert. den., 358 U.S. 899 , 3 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hi-Line Electric Company v. Dowco Electrical Products
Id. at 1179 & 1180 n. 9; see also Hyde Corp. v. Huffines, 158 Tex. 566 , 314 S.W.2d 763, 766 (adopting § 757 of the Restatement of Torts which provides that a “list of customers” may be a trade secret), cert. denied, 358 U.S. 898 , 79 S.Ct. 223 , 3 L.Ed.2d 148 (1958).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Interox America v. Ppg Industries, Inc.
See also Hyde Corp. v. Huffines, 158 Tex. 566 , 314 S.W.2d 763 , cert. denied, 358 U.S. 898 , 79 S.Ct. 223 , 3 L.Ed.2d 148 (1958).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
People v. Yates
(2×)
(People v. Rhodes (1981), 85 Ill. 2d 241, 249 ; People v. Taylor (1965), 32 Ill. 2d 165, 168 (despite the presence of other “smudged” fingerprints on the window of a burglarized apartment, the unexplained presence of defendant’s prints is not consistent with any reasonable hypothesis of innocence); see also People v. Malmenato (1958), 14 Ill. 2d 52 , cert. denied (1958), 358 U.S. 899 , 3 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Rollins v. Leibold
See, e. g., United States v. Hatahley, 257 F.2d 920 (10th Cir. 1958), cert. denied, 358 U.S. 899 , 79 S.Ct. 222 , 3 L.Ed.2d 148 (1958) ; Preble v. Hanna, 317 Or. 306 , 244 P. 75, 78 (1926) ; Colorado Kenworth Corp. v. Whitworth, 144 Colo. 541 , 357 P.2d 626, 631 (1960) ; Craddock v. Tones, 143 So. 529, 531 (La.Ct.App.1932) ; Harris v. Christianson-Keitldey Co., 303 S.W.2d 422 (Tex.Ct.App.1957) ; Waller v. Hail, 46 S.W. 82 (Tex.Ct.App.1898). 24 . 1 F. Harper & F. James, The Law of Torts § 236, at 190-92 (1956). 25 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Federal Trade Commission
v.
Simplicity Pattern Co., Inc. and Simplicity Pattern Co., Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission
v.
Simplicity Pattern Co., Inc. and Simplicity Pattern Co., Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission
No. 406; No. 447.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 24, 1958.
Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Hansen, Daniel M. Friedman, Earl W. Kintner, James E. Cor key and Alvin L. Berman for the Federal Trade Commission. William Simon, Robert L. Wald and David Vorhaus for the Simplicity Pattern Co., Inc.
Published
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Certiorari granted.
Reported below: 103 U. S. App. D. C. 373, 258 F. 2d 673.