Eger v. Florida State Bd. of Dentistry, 404 U.S. 988 (1971). · Go Syfert
Search
Eger v. Florida State Bd. of Dentistry, 404 U.S. 988 (1971). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
115 citation events across 32 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Kinnear-Weed Corporation and C. W. Kinnear, Pliantiffs-Appellants v. Reed Roller Bit Company (ca5, 1975-02-12)
Treatment trajectory · 1972 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1972 1999 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers.
discussed Cited "see" Kinnear-Weed Corporation and C. W. Kinnear, Pliantiffs-Appellants v. Reed Roller Bit Company
5th Cir. · 1975 · signal: see · confidence high
See Kinnear-Weed Corporation v. Humble Oil & Refining Co.. S.D.Tex., 1969, 324 F.Supp. 1371 , aff’d, 441 F.2d 631 (5 Cir., 1971), cert. den., 404 U.S. 941 , 92 S.Ct. 285 , 30 L.Ed.2d 255 (1971), reh. den., 404 U.S. 996 , 92 S.Ct. 532 , 30 L.Ed.2d 549 (1971).
discussed Cited "see" Gould v. American Hawaiian Steamship Company
D. Del. · 1973 · signal: see · confidence high
See generally Moses v. Burgin, 445 F.2d 369, 384 (1st Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 994 , 92 S.Ct. 532 , 30 L.Ed.2d 547 (1971) and Mitchell v. Texas Gulf Sulphur Co., 446 F.2d 90 (10th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 1004 , 92 S.Ct. 564 , 30 L.Ed.2d 558 (1971).
discussed Cited "see" Weiss v. Chalker
S.D.N.Y. · 1973 · signal: see · confidence high
See Moses v. Burgin, 1 Cir., 445 F.2d 369 , cert. denied, 404 U.S. 994 , 92 S.Ct. 532 , 30 L.Ed. 2d 547 (1971); (2) that the defendants breached their fiduciary duty in arranging the merger of the funds investment adviser and underwriter, Anchor Corporation with Washington National Corporation, and are thus liable to the funds for the profits made on the “sale” of the advisory office.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,020 Richard Lessler v. Arthur D. Little
1st Cir. · 1988 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Moses v. Burgin, 445 F.2d 369 , 373 & n. 7 (1st Cir.) (finding an implied private cause of action under section 36 of the Investment Company Act as it existed prior to the 1970 amendments in which Congress made explicit that such a private cause of action exists), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 994 , 92 S.Ct. 532 , 30 L.Ed.2d 547 (1971).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Krinsk v. Fund Asset Management, Inc.
S.D.N.Y. · 1987 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also, Moses v. Burgin, 445 F.2d 369, 373 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 994 , 92 S.Ct. 532 , 30 L.Ed.2d 547 (1971); Taussig v. Wellington Fund, Inc., 313 F.2d 472, 476 (3d Cir.1963); Esplin v. Hirschi, 402 F.2d 94, 103 (10th Cir.1968), cert. denied, 394 U.S. 928 , 89 S.Ct. 1194 , 22 L.Ed.2d 459 (1969). 2 In 1970, following a period of explosive growth in the investment company industry, Congress enacted comprehensive amendments to the Act.
cited Cited "see, e.g." Bloom v. Bradford
E.D.N.Y · 1979 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Moses v. Burgin, 445 F.2d 369, 373 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 994 , 92 S.Ct. 532 , 30 L.Ed.2d 547 (1971); Tanzer v. Huffines, 314 F.Supp. 189, 193 (D.Del.1970).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Sullivan v. Chase Investment Services of Boston, Inc.
N.D. Cal. · 1977 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See e. g., Moses v. Burgin, 445 F.2d 369, 373 (1 Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 994 , 92 S.Ct. 532 , 30 L.Ed.2d 547 (1971); Herpich v. Wallace, 430 F.2d 792, 815 (5 Cir. 1970); Esplin v. Hirschi, 402 F.2d 94, 103 (10 Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 394 U.S. 928 , 89 S.Ct. 1194 , 22 L.Ed.2d 459 (1969); Taussig v. Wellington Fund, Inc., 313 F.2d 472, 476 (3 Cir.), cert. denied, 374 U.S. 806 , 83 S.Ct. 1693 , 10 L.Ed.2d 1031 (1963). 9 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Joseph N. Palladino, Joseph N. Palladino, Jr.
1st Cir. · 1973 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also United States v. Manarite, 448 F.2d 583, 593 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 947 , 92 S.Ct. 281 , 30 L.Ed.2d 264 (1971) 8 He adds the necessary caveat, "Of course the testimony of experts would not displace judge or jury in determining the ultimate question whether the particular book is obscene, any more than the testimony of experts relating to the state of the art in patent suits determines the patentability of a controverted device." 361 U.S. at 165 , 80 S.Ct. at 225 9 Defendants assert that the Supreme Court in Wiener v. California, 404 U.S. 988 , 92 S.Ct. 534 , 30 L.Ed.2d 539 …
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Vernon Walker Huffman v. United States, Dennis Eugene Pryba v. United States
D.C. Cir. · 1972 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare Hayse v. Van Hoomissen, 321 F.Supp. 642 (D.C.Or.1970) 5 State v. Burgin, 255 S.C. 237 , 178 S.E. 2d 325 (1970) 6 This approach would clearly account for Hartstein v. Missouri, 404 U.S. 988 , 92 S.Ct. 531 , 30 L.Ed.2d 539 (1971), where the Court, citing Redrup, summarily reversed a conviction, 469 S.W.2d 329 (Mo. 1971), based on the film "Night of Lust," which the state court deemed obscene because of close-up portrayals of "gyrating naked breasts" and "nude body gyrations and undulations," which led the court to conclude that "the motion picture suggests promiscuous sexual intercourse …
Eger
v.
Florida State Board of Dentistry
No. 71-349.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 14, 1971.
404 U.S. 988
Published

Appeal from Sup. Ct. Fla. dismissed for want of substantial federal question.