green
Positive treatment
2.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 1972 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1972
1999
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. James Louis Whitt, AKA Jim Whitt
See United States v. DePugh, 452 F.2d 915, 921 (10th Cir.1971), cert. denied, 407 U.S. 920 , 92 S.Ct. 2452 , 32 L.Ed.2d 805 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Sammie Everett Gardner
See United States v. DePugh, 452 F.2d 915 (10th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 407 U.S. 920 , 92 S.Ct. 2452 , 32 L.Ed.2d 805 . 6 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Jesse Smith and Rocco Lauria
Accord, United States v. Binder, 453 F. 2d 805, 808 (2d Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 407 U.S. 920 , 92 S.Ct. 2458 , 32 L.Ed.2d 805 (U.S.1972); United States v. Russo, 442 F.2d 498, 501 (2d Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 1022 , 92 S.Ct. 669 , 30 L.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Lewis
See also United States v. DePugh, 452 F.2d 915 (10th Cir.1971), cert. denied, 407 U.S. 920 , 92 S.Ct. 2452 , 32 L.Ed.2d 805 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Joseph J. Grimaldi v. United States
See also United States v. DePugh, 452 F.2d 915 (10th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 407 U.S. 920 , 92 S.Ct. 2452 , 32 L.Ed.2d 805 (1972), reh. denied, 409 U.S. 898 , 93 S.Ct. 101 , 34 L.Ed.2d 157 (1972) (“destructive devices”); James v. United States, 416 F.2d 467 (5th Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 907 , 90 S.Ct. 902 , 25 L.Ed.2d 87 (1970) (“gambling paraphernalia”); United States v. Johnson, supra (“marijuana, paraphrenalia [sic], and U.S. currency”); United States v. Wilson, 451 F.2d 209 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 1032 , 92 S.Ct. 1298 , 31 L.Ed.2d 490 (1971) (“paraphern…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Richard Otto Pietras
See, e. g., United States v. DePugh, 452 F.2d 915, 923 (10th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 407 U.S. 920 , 92 S.Ct. 2452 , 32 L.Ed.2d 805 (1972); United States v. Virciglio, 441 F.2d 1295, 1298 (5th Cir. 1971).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Wilkinson v. Skinner
See Wilwording v. Swenson, 404 U.S. 249 , 92 S.Ct. 407 , 30 L.Ed.2d 418 (1971); see also Rodriguez v. McGinnis, 456 F.2d 79 (2d Cir.) (en banc), cert. granted, Oswald v. Rodriguez, 407 U.S. 919 , 92 S.Ct. 2459 , 32 L.Ed.2d 805 (1972) 2 7 NYCRR Sec. 5100.10(e) provided as follows: All incoming and outgoing letters should be carefully censored, the censorship stamp should be placed on all letters, dated, and initialed by the censoring officer.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Oswald, Correction Commissioner
v.
Rodriguez
v.
Rodriguez
No. 71-1369.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 19, 1972.
Cited by 11 opinions | Published
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari granted.