green
Positive treatment
5.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1973 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1973
1999
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Aladdin Oil Company v. Texaco, Inc. And Poweram Oil Co., Inc.
Ct. 912, 34 L.Ed.2d 690 (1973).
examined
Cited as authority (rule)
Bergenthal v. State
(4×)
Supp. 848, and that decision was affirmed by the court of appeals, Bergenthal v. Cady (7th Cir. 1972), 466 Fed. 2d 635, certiorari denied, 409 U. S. 1109 , 93 Sup. Ct. 913, 34 L.
cited
Cited "see"
Frederick S. Solheim v. Sandra B. Armstrong, Western Regional Commissioner, United States Parole Commission Robert Christensen
See Bergenthal v. Cady, 466 F.2d 635, 638 (7th Cir.1972), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1109 , 93 S.Ct. 913 , 34 L.Ed.2d 690 (1973).
cited
Cited "see"
Jackson v. Duckworth
See, Bergenthal v. Cady, 466 F.2d 635, 637 (7th Cir.1972), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1109 , 93 S.Ct. 913 , 34 L.Ed.2d 690 (1973).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Emery
See, Bergenthal v. Cady, 1972, 7 Cir., 466 F.2d 635 , cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1109 , 93 S.Ct. 913 , 34 L.Ed.2d 690 .
cited
Cited "see"
Paula Payne Products Co. v. Johnson Publishing Co.
See Ford Motor Co. v. Ford, 462 F.2d 1405, 1407 , 59 C.C.P.A.-, - (1972), cert. den., 409 U.S. 1109 , 93 S.Ct. 910 , 34 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Sterling Drug, Inc. v. Bayer AG
See, e.g., Ford Motor Co. v. Ford, 462 F.2d 1405 (C.C.P.A.1972) (cancelling “Ford Records” registration because of likelihood of confusion with Ford Motor Company’s trademark “Ford”), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1109 , 93 S.Ct. 910 , 34 L.Ed.2d 690 (1973); Southern Enterprises, Inc. v. Burger King of Florida, Inc., 419 F.2d 460 (C.C.P.A.1970) (cancelling.‘Whoppaburger” registration because of likelihood of confusion with Burger King’s ‘Whopper” trademark).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Sterling Drug, Incorporated v. Bayer Ag
See, e.g., Ford Motor Co. v. Ford, 462 F.2d 1405 (C.C.P.A.1972) (cancelling "Ford Records" registration because of likelihood of confusion with Ford Motor Company's trademark "Ford"), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1109 , 93 S.Ct. 910 , 34 L.Ed.2d 690 (1973); Southern Enterprises, Inc. v. Burger King of Florida, Inc., 419 F.2d 460 (C.C.P.A.1970) (cancelling "Whoppaburger" registration because of likelihood of confusion with Burger King's "Whopper" trademark).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Juan Ramon Matta-Ballesteros v. Gary L. Henman, Warden, United States Penitentiary at Marion, Illinois
(2×)
Sec. 2254 (d) and by the decisions of both this Court and the Supreme Court. 12 The Seventh Circuit has held that "an evidentiary hearing is not necessary when the facts essential to consideration of the constitutional issue are already before the court." Jeter v. Keohane, 739 F.2d 257 n. 1 (7th Cir.1984); see also Bergenthal v. Cady, 466 F.2d 635, 648 (7th Cir.1972), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1109 , 93 S.Ct. 913 , 34 L.Ed.2d 690 (1973).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Raymond C. Rieser, Administrator for the Estate and Personal Representative of Rebecca A. Rieser v. District of Columbia, and Timothy Abron. Raymond C. Rieser, Administrator for the Estate and Personal Representative of Rebecca A. Rieser v. District of Columbia
See, e. g., Gerneth v. City of Detroit, 465 F.2d 784, 786-87 (6th Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1109 , 93 S.Ct. 913 , 34 L.Ed.2d 690 (1973); City of Tampa v. Davis, 226 So.2d 450 (Fla.App.1969).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Brennen v. City of Eugene
See, e.g., Gerneth v. City of Detroit, 465 F.2d 784 (6th Cir.) cert. den. 409 U.S. 1109 , 93 S.Ct. 913 , 34 L.Ed.2d 690 (1972); Duran v. City of Tucson, 20 Ariz. App. 22 , 509 P.2d 1059 rev. den. (1973); Leger v. Kelley, 142 Conn. 585 , 116 A.2d 429 (1955); Stigler v. City of Chicago, 48 Ill.2d 20 , 268 N.E.2d 26 (1971); Chambers v. Palaggi, 88 Ill.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Rieser v. District of Columbia
See, e. g., Gerneth v. City of Detroit, 465 F.2d 784, 786-87 (6th Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1109 , 93 S.Ct. 913 , 34 L.Ed.2d 690 (1973); City of Tampa v. Davis, 226 So.2d 450 (Fla.App. 1969).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
California
v.
Municipal Court for the Sacramento Municipal Court District of Sacramento County (Alford, Real Party in Interest)
v.
Municipal Court for the Sacramento Municipal Court District of Sacramento County (Alford, Real Party in Interest)
No. 72-714.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 8, 1973.
409 U.S. 1109
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Ct. App. Cal., 3d App. Dist. Certiorari denied.