green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
6.1 score
“trademark protection guards the public from being deceived into purchasing an infringing unwanted product”
Treatment trajectory · 1974 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1974
2000
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 25 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Programmed Tax Systems, Inc. v. Raytheon Co.
trademark protection guards the public from being deceived into purchasing an infringing unwanted product
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
State v. Wilson
In State v. Armstrong, 183 N.W. 2d 205 (Sup. Ct. 1971), cert. den. 414 U.S. 857 , 94 S.Ct. 163 , 38 L.Ed. 2d 108 *7 (1973), the court stated (at 208) that for evidence of other offenses to go to the jury, it must be such as to leave "no room for speculation" in the jurors' minds.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
New York Telephone Co. v. New York State Department of Labor
Plaintiffs, following the suggestions in Grinnell Corp. v. Hackett, 475 F.2d 449 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 858 , 879, 94 S.Ct. 59 , 164, 38 L.Ed.2d 108, 124 (1973), engaged Dr. Gerald J.
cited
Cited "see"
Opinion Number
See Rice v. U.S. , 348 F. Supp. 254 (1972) affirmed at 479 F.2d 58 (1973), cert denied 94 S.Ct. 66 , 414 U.S. 858 , 38 L.Ed.2d 108 (1973); St.
cited
Cited "see"
Chittenden Trust Co. v. Sebert Lumber Co. (In Re Vermont Toy Works, Inc.)
See In re Beck Indus., 479 F.2d 410, 417 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 858 , 94 S.Ct. 163 , 38 L.Ed.2d 108 (1973).
cited
Cited "see"
Nestle Co., Inc. v. Chester's Market, Inc.
See Beer Nuts, Inc. v. King Nut Company, 477 F.2d 326, 328 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 858 , 94 S.Ct. 66 , 38 L.Ed.2d 108 (1973).
discussed
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Romeri
(2×)
See Commonwealth v. Pierce, 451 Pa. 190 , 303 A.2d 209 (1973), cert, denied, 414 U.S. 878 , 94 S.Ct. 164 , 38 L.Ed.2d 124 (1973).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hindu Incense, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Charles Meadows and Dorothy Meadows, Defendants-Appellants/cross-Appellees
See Beer Nuts, Inc. v. King Nut Co., 477 F.2d 326, 328 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 858 , 94 S.Ct. 66 , 38 L.Ed.2d 108 (1973), rehearing denied, 414 U.S. 1033 , 94 S.Ct. 465 , 38 L.Ed.2d 326 (1973).
cited
Cited "see"
Health Industries, Inc. v. European Health Spas
See, Beer Nuts, Inc. v. King Nut Co., 477 F.2d 326 (3rd Cir. 1973), cert. den. 414 U.S. 858 , 94 S.Ct. 66 , 38 L.Ed.2d 108 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Reddy Communications v. Environmental Action
See Beer Nuts, Inc. v. King Nut Co., 477 F.2d 326 (6th Cir. 1973) cert. denied 414 U.S. 858 , 94 S.Ct. 66 , 38 L.Ed.2d 108 (1973); Dresser Industries, Inc. v. Heraeus Engelhard Vacuum, Inc., 395 F.2d 457 (3rd Cir. 1968); Mr. Travel v. V.I.P.
discussed
Cited "see"
Reddy Communications, Inc. v. Environmental Action Foundation
See Beer Nuts, Inc. v. King Nut Co., 477 F.2d 326 (6th Cir. 1973) cert. denied 414 U.S. 858 , 94 S.Ct. 66 , 38 L.Ed.2d 108 (1973); Dresser Industries, Inc. v. Heraeus Engelhard Vacuum, Inc., 395 F.2d 457 (3rd Cir. 1968); Mr. Travel v. V.I.P.
discussed
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Sutton
(2×)
See Commonwealth v. Pierce, 451 Pa. 190 , 303 A.2d 209 , cert. denied, 414 U.S. 878 , 94 S.Ct. 164 , 38 L.Ed.2d 124 (1973).
discussed
Cited "see"
Olin Corp. v. Illinois, Department of Labor
(2×)
See, Grinnell Corp. v. Hackett, 475 F.2d 449 (1st Cir. 1973), cert. denied 414 U.S. 858 , 94 S.Ct. 164 , 38 L.Ed.2d 108 (1973), New York Telephone Co. v. New York State Department of Labor, 434 F.Supp. 810 (S.D.N.Y.1977), reversed 566 F.2d 388 (2nd Cir. 1977); Hawaiian Telephone Co. v. State of Hawaii Department of Labor and Industrial Relations, 405 F.Supp. 275 (D.C.Hawaii 1975), and Kimbell, Inc. v. Employment Security Commission, 429 U.S. 804 , 97 S.Ct. 36 , 50 L.Ed.2d 64 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Dobrolenski
See Commonwealth v. Pierce, 451 Pa. 190, 200 , 303 A.2d 209 , cert. denied, 414 U.S. 878 , 94 S.Ct. 164 , 38 L.Ed.2d 124 (1973); see generally ABA Project on Minimum Standards for Criminal Justice, Standards Relating to Fair Trial and Free Press §§ 1.1, 2.1 (Approved Draft, 1968).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Westinghouse Electric Corporation, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellant v. General Circuit Breaker & Electric Supply Inc. Ac Circuit Breaker-Electric Supply, Inc. General Circuit Breaker & Electric Supply Inc. Xavier Contreras Pencon International, Inc. General Magnetics/electric Wholesale the Estate of Charley Contreras Panelboard Specialties Wholesale Electric, Inc. Jaime A. Contreras, Joe A. Contreras, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-Appellee. In Re Circuit Breaker Litigation Westinghouse Electric Corporation, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellant v. Ac Circuit Breaker-Electric Supply, Inc. Joe A. Contreras General Circuit Breaker & Electric Supply Inc. Xavier Contreras Pencon International, Inc. The Estate of Charley Contreras Panelboard Specialties Wholesale Electric, Inc. General Magnetics/electric Wholesale Jaime A. Contreras, Defendants-Counter-Claimants-Appellees. Westinghouse Electric Corporation, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellee v. General Circuit Breaker & Electric Supply Inc. Joe A. Contreras Ac Circuit Breaker-Electric Supply, Inc. General Circuit Breaker & Electric Supply Inc. Xavier Contreras Pencon International, Inc. General Magnetics/electric Wholesale the Estate of Charley Contreras, Defendants-Counter-Claimants, and Panelboard Specialties Wholesale Electric, Inc. Jaime A. Contreras, Defendants-Counter-Claimants-Appellants. Westinghouse Electric Corporation, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellee v. General Circuit Breaker & Electric Supply Inc. Joe A. Contreras Ac Circuit Breaker-Electric Supply, Inc. General Circuit Breaker-Electric Supply Inc. Xavier Contreras Panelboard Specialties Wholesale Electric, Inc. Jaime A. Contreras, Defendants-Counter-Claimants, and Pencon International, Inc. General Magnetics/electric Wholesale the Estate of Charley Contreras, Defendants-Counter-Claimants-Appellants. In Re Circuit Breaker Litigation Westinghouse Electric Corporation, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. General Circuit Breaker & Electric Supply Co. Xavier Contreras Ac Circuit Breaker-Electric Supply, Inc. Joe A. Contreras Pencon International, Inc. The Estate of Charley Contreras General Magnetics/electric Wholesale Panelboard Specialties Wholesale Electric, Inc. Jaime A. Contreras, Defendants-Counter-Claimants-Appellees-Cross-Appellants
International Order of Job's Daughters v. Lindeburg & Co., 633 F.2d 912, 918 (9th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 941 , 101 S.Ct. 3086 , 69 L.Ed.2d 956 (1981); see also Beer Nuts, Inc. v. King Nut Co., 477 F.2d 326, 329 (6th Cir.) ("The essence of the wrong of trademark infringement is the passing off of the goods of one as those of another."), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 858 , 94 S.Ct. 66 , 38 L.Ed.2d 108 (1973).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. General Circuit Breaker & Electric Supply Inc.
International Order of Job’s Daughters v. Lindeburg & Co., 633 F.2d 912, 918 (9th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 941 , 101 S.Ct. 3086 , 69 L.Ed.2d 956 (1981); see also Beer Nuts, Inc. v. King Nut Co., 477 F.2d 326, 329 (6th Cir.) (“The essence of the wrong of trademark infringement is the passing off of the goods of one as those of another.”), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 858 , 94 S.Ct. 66 , 38 L.Ed.2d 108 (1973).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Houbigant, Inc. v. ACB Mercantile, Inc.
Compare Lear, Inc. v. Adkins, 395 U.S. 653 , 89 S.Ct. 1902 , 23 L.Ed.2d 610 (1969) (estoppel doctrine does not apply to patent licensees) with Beer Nuts, Inc. v. King Nut Co., 477 F.2d 326, 328-29 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 858 , 94 S.Ct. 66 , 38 L.Ed.2d 108 (1973) (estoppel doctrine does apply to trademark licensees).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Circuit Breaker Litigation
See also Beer Nuts, Inc. v. King Nut Co., 477 F.2d 326, 329 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 858 , 94 S.Ct. 66 , 38 L.Ed.2d 108 (1973) ("The essence of the wrong of trademark infringement is the passing off of the goods of one as those of another.”); Continental Motors Corp. v. Continental Aviation Corp., 375 F.2d 857, 861 (5th Cir. 1967) ("Confusion, or the likelihood of confusion ... is the real test of trademark infringement.”); Safeway Stores, Inc. v. Safeway Properties, Inc., 307 F.2d 495, 497 (2d Cir.1962) (“The keystone in that portion of the law of unfair competition which rela…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Danjaq, S.A. v. MGM/UA Communications, Co.
In fact, it is an undisputed axiom even in bankruptcy that “ownership of all of the outstanding stock of a corporation is not the equivalent of ownership of the subsidiary’s property or assets.” 5 King, Collier on Bankruptcy, 15th ed., § 1100.06; see, e.g., In re Beck Industries, Inc., 479 F.2d 410 (2d Cir.1973), cert. denied 414 U.S. 858 , 94 S.Ct. 163 , 38 L.Ed.2d 108 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Wcvb-Tv v. Boston Athletic Association
Compare Lear, Inc. v. Adkins, 395 U.S. 653 , 89 S.Ct. 1902 , 23 L.Ed.2d 610 (1969) (estoppel doctrine does not apply to patent licensees) with Beer Nuts, Inc. v. King Nut Co., 477 F.2d 326, 328-29 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 858 , 94 S.Ct. 66 , 38 L.Ed.2d 108 (1973) (estoppel doctrine does apply to trademark licensees).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Mobil Oil Corporation v. Pegasus Petroleum Corporation
See, e.g., Beer Nuts, Inc. v. King Nut Co., 477 F.2d 326, 329 (6th Cir.) (“It is well settled that words and their pictorial representation are treated the same in determining the likelihood of confusion between two marks.”), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 858 , 94 S.Ct. 66 , 38 L.Ed.2d 108 (1973); Izod, Ltd. v. Zip Hosiery Co., 405 F.2d 575, 577 (C.C.P.A.1969) (“Members of the purchasing public viewing appellant’s pictorial representation of a feline animal as applied to men’s and women’s outer shirts and appellee’s literal designation TIGER HEAD for men’s work socks might well and re…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Visa International Service Association v. Bankcard Holders Of America
See, e.g., Beer Nuts, Inc. v. King Nut Co., 477 F.2d 326, 328 (6th Cir.) ("weigh the public benefit in considering trademark principles in connection with the policy of upholding the law of contracts"), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 858 , 94 S.Ct. 66 , 38 L.Ed.2d 108 (1973).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Visa International Service Ass'n v. Bankcard Holders of America
See, e.g., Beer Nuts, Inc. v. King Nut Co., 477 F.2d 326, 328 (6th Cir.) (“weigh the public benefit in considering trademark principles in connection with the policy of upholding the law of contracts”), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 858 , 94 S.Ct. 66 , 38 L.Ed.2d 108 (1973).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
WLWC Centers, Inc. v. Winners Corp.
See, e.g., Beer Nuts, Inc. v. King Nut Company, 477 F.2d 326 (6th Cir.), cert. denied 414 U.S. 858 , 94 S.Ct. 66 , 38 L.Ed.2d 108 , reh. denied, 414 U.S. 1033 , 94 S.Ct. 465 , 38 L.Ed.2d 326 (1973).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Commonwealth v. Reeves
(2×)
See also Commonwealth v. Pierce, 451 Pa. 190 , 303 A.2d 209 , cert. denied, 414 U.S. 878 , 94 S.Ct. 164 , 38 L.Ed.2d 124 (1973).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Albert
v.
Chemical Leaman Tank Lines, Inc.
v.
Chemical Leaman Tank Lines, Inc.
No. 73-125.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 9, 1973.
Cited by 83 opinions | Published
Citer courts: S.D. New York (1)
C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.