green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
9.6 score
“the notion that being a 'party' before an agency either automatically confers or is a necessary condition of the right to judicial review .”
Treatment trajectory · 1973 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1973
1999
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 22 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Jeanne Armsted Rhody and Donnell Rhody v. State Farm Mutual Insurance Company
(2×)
clearly erroneous
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Dankman v. District of Columbia Board of Elections & Ethics
(2×)
the notion that being a 'party' before an agency either automatically confers or is a necessary condition of the right to judicial review .
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Duff L. Brumley v. The City of Cleveland
People’s Bank of Van Leer v. Bryan, 55 Tenn.App. 166 , 397 S.W.2d 400 [401]; Bayside Warehouse Co. v. Memphis, 63 Tenn. App. 268 , 470 S.W.2d 375 ; Brown v. Tenn. Real Estate Comm., Tenn.App. 1972, 494 S.W.2d 506 , cert. den. 414 U.S. 877 , 94 Sup. Ct. 54, 38 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Lee
See United States v. Erdos, 474 F.2d 157, 160 (4th Cir.) (“Venue, in cases of crimes committed outside any district, is controlled by 18 U.S.C. § 3238”), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 876 , 94 S.Ct. 42 , 38 L.Ed.2d 122 (1973); see also United States v. Liang, 224 F.3d 1057, 1059 (9th Cir.2000) (“To satisfy venue requirements under § 3238, the government must show that Zhou was ‘first brought to’ or ‘arrested’ in CNMI”); 2 Charles Alan Wright, Federal Practice and Procedure § 304 (3d ed.2000) at 333 (“Section 3238 is a venue statute”).
cited
Cited "see"
Witten v. Pitman
See United States v. Erdos, 474 F.2d 157 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 876 , 94 S.Ct. 42 , 38 L.Ed.2d 122 (1973).
cited
Cited "see"
Philip Morris, Inc. v. Block
See Coca-Cola Company v. Federal Trade Commission, 475 F.2d 299, 303-04 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 877 , 94 S.Ct. 121 , 38 L.Ed.2d 122 (1973).
cited
Cited "see"
Philip Morris, Incorporated v. John R. Block
See Coca-Cola Company v. Federal Trade Commission, 475 F.2d 299, 303-04 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 877 , 94 S.Ct. 121 , 38 L.Ed.2d 122 (1973).
cited
Cited "see"
Colorado Health Facilities Review Council v. District Court In & For City & County of Denver
Accord, Coca-Cola Co. v. Federal Trade Commission, 475 F.2d 299 (5th Cir.), cert, denied, 414 U.S. 865 , 94 5.Ct. 121, 38 L.Ed.2d 122 (1973).
cited
Cited "see"
Colo. Health Fac. Rev. Council v. Dist. Ct.
Accord, Coca-Cola Co. v. Federal Trade Commission, 475 F.2d 299 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 865 , 94 S.Ct. 121 , 38 L.Ed.2d 122 (1973).
cited
Cited "see"
First National Monetary Corporation v. Commodity Futures Trading Commission, Philip McB Johnson, Chairman, James M. Stone, Susan M. Phillips, and David G. Gartner, Commissioners, Monex International, Ltd. v. Commodity Futures Trading Commission, Philip McB Johnson, Chairman, James M. Stone, Susan M. Phillips, and David G. Gartner, Commissioners, and George H. Painter, Administrative Law Judge
See Pepsico, Inc. v. Federal Trade Comm'n, 472 F.2d 179 (2nd Cir. 1972), cert. denied 414 U.S. 876 , 94 S.Ct. 44 , 38 L.Ed.2d 122 (1973).
cited
Cited "see"
First National Monetary Corp. v. Commodity Futures Trading Commission
See Pepsico, Inc. v. Federal Trade Comm’n, 472 F.2d 179 (2nd Cir. 1972), cert. denied 414 U.S. 876 , 94 S.Ct. 44 , 38 L.Ed.2d 122 (1973).
discussed
Cited "see"
City of Cleveland v. Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co.
See Coca-Cola Company v. Federal Trade Commission, 475 F.2d 299, 304 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 877 , 94 S.Ct. 121 , 38 L.Ed.2d 122 (1973); Continental Can Company, U. S. A. v. Marshall, 603 F.2d 590 , 594-96 (7th Cir. 1979); United Telephone Company of Pennsylvania v. Federal Communications Commission, 375 F.Supp. 992 , 997 n.3 (M.D.Pa.1974); cf. Cunegin v. Zayre Department Store, 437 F.Supp. 100, 103 (E.D.Wis.1977).
cited
Cited "see"
Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corporation, Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., Orange and Rockland Utilities, Inc., and Power Authority of the State of New York v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, and Hudson River Fishermen's Association, Intervenor-Respondent. Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corporation, Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., Orange and Rockland Utilities, Inc., and Power Authority of the State of New York v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Douglas M. Costle, as Administrator, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Eckardt C. Beck, Regional Administrator, Region Ii, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, and Peter A. A. Berle, Commissioner, New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, and Hudson River Fishermen's Association, Intervenor-Defendant-Appellee
See Pepsico, Inc. v. FTC, 472 F.2d 179 , 185-86 & n.7 (2d Cir. 1972), Cert. denied, 414 U.S. 876 , 94 S.Ct. 44 , 38 L.Ed.2d 122 (1973).
cited
Cited "see"
Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. United States Environmental Protection Agency
See Pepsico, Inc. v. FTC, 472 F.2d 179 , 185-86 & n.7 (2d Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 876 , 94 S.Ct. 44 , 38 L.Ed.2d 122 (1973).
cited
Cited "see"
Association Of National Advertisers, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission
See Pepsico, Inc. v. FTC, 472 F.2d 179 , 186 n.7 (2d Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 876 , 94 S.Ct. 44 , 38 L.Ed.2d 122 (1973).
cited
Cited "see"
Association of National Advertisers, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission
See Pepsico, Inc. v. FTC, 472 F.2d 179 , 186 n.7 (2d Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 876 , 94 S.Ct. 44 , 38 L.Ed.2d 122 (1973).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Thomas J. Brunson
See United States v. Erdos, 474 F.2d 157, 159-60 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 876 , 96 S.Ct. 42 , 38 L.Ed.2d 122 (1973); cf. Battle v. United States, 209 U.S. 36, 37, 28 S.Ct. 422, 423 , 52 L.Ed. 670 (1908) (holding that federal statute proscribing murder “within any fort, arsenal, dockyard, magazine, or in any other place or district of country under the exclusive jurisdiction of the United States” encompasses murder on land bought by United States on which post office was under construction; states that under U.S.Const. art.
cited
Cited "see"
Mobil Oil Corp. v. Federal Trade Commission
See generally PepsiCo, Inc. v. FTC, 472 F.2d 179 , 186 n.7 (2d Cir. 1972) (Friendly, C.J.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 876 , 94 S.Ct. 44 , 38 L.Ed.2d 122 (1973).
discussed
Cited "see"
Sterling Drug, Inc. v. Weinberger
(2×)
See Coca-Cola Co. v. FTC, 475 F.2d 299, 304 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 877 , 94 S.Ct. 121 , 38 L.Ed.2d 122 (1973).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Rowe v. Grapevine Corp.
See 5 U.S.C. § 702 (1995) (providing that "[a] person ... adversely affected or aggrieved by agency action- ... is entitled to judicial review thereof”); see also PepsiCo, Inc. v. FTC, 472 F.2d 179, 185-86 (2nd Cir.1972), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 876 , 94 S.Ct. 44 , 38 L.Ed.2d 122 (1973) (rejecting position that review of administrative rulings is limited to entities that were parties to administrative proceeding and citing Pittsburgh & W.Va.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Lily G. Harvey and Rosenthal & Company v. Gary L. Seevers
See also Coca-Cola Co. v. FTC, 475 F.2d 299 (5th Cir. 1973), certiorari denied, 414 U.S. 877 , 94 S.Ct. 121 , 38 L.Ed.2d 122 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Olenz
v.
Marovitz, U. S. District Judge
v.
Marovitz, U. S. District Judge
No. 72-1440.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 9, 1973.
Published
Citer courts: Tenth Circuit (2) · District of Columbia Court of … (2)
C. A. 7th. Motion to dispense with printing petition granted. Certiorari denied.