green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
6.3 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 1974 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1974
2000
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 23 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "but see"
Mooney v. Tallant
But see United California Bank v. Salik, 481 F.2d 1012 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1004 , 94 S.Ct. 361 , 38 L.Ed.2d 240 (1973).
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Mayer v. Wing
capricious action in a legal sense is established when an administrative agency on identical facts decides differently.
discussed
Cited "see"
Ficarra v. Department of Regulatory Agencies, Division of Insurance
Sav. & Loan Assoc., 87 Misc.2d 344 , 384 N.Y.S.2d 923, 928 (N.Y.Sup.Ct.1976); accord Lefrak Forest Hills Corp. v. Galvin, 40 A.D.2d 211 , 338 N.Y.S.2d 932, 939 (1972), aff'd, 32 N.Y.2d 796 , 345 N.Y.S.2d 547 , 298 N.E.2d 685 , cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1004 , 94 S.Ct. 360 , 38 L.Ed.2d 240 ; cf. D.K.B., 843 P.2d at 1334 (Kirshbaum & Quinn, JJ., concurring) (“There are no bright line tests to determine what constitutes a vested right or when that right accrues.”).
cited
Cited "see"
People v. Taylor
See United States v. Ruiz, 477 F.2d 918 (2d Cir.1973), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1004 , 94 S.Ct. 361 , 38 L.Ed.2d 240 (1973).
discussed
Cited "see"
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,640 John William Davis v. Birr, Wilson & Co., Inc., a California Corporation, Defendants
(2×)
See, United California Bank v. Salik, 481 F.2d 1012, 1015 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1004 , 94 S.Ct. 361 , 38 L.Ed.2d 240 (1973); Sackett v. Beaman, 399 F.2d 884, 890-91 (9th Cir.1968); Turner v. Lundquist, [ 377 F.2d 44 (9th Cir.1967) ].
discussed
Cited "see"
Bresson v. Thomson McKinnon Securities, Inc.
See Berry Petroleum Co. v. Adams & Peck, supra, 518 F.2d at 409 (“[T]he broad remedial policies of the federal securities laws are best served by a longer, not a shorter, statute of limitations.”) (quoting United California Bank v. Salik, 481 F.2d 1012, 1015 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1004 , 94 S.Ct. 361 , 38 L.Ed.2d 240 (1973)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Dahl v. Gardner
See United California Bank v. Salik, 481 F.2d 1012, 1014-15 (9th Cir.), cert. den., 414 U.S. 1004 , 94 S.Ct. 361 , 38 L.Ed.2d 240 (1973); Brown v. Producers Livestock Loan Co., 469 F.Supp. 27, 30 (D.Utah 1978).
cited
Cited "see"
Kirschner v. Cable/Tel Corp.
See United California Bank v. Salik, 481 F.2d 1012, 1015 (9th Cir.1973), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1004 , 94 S.Ct. 361 , 38 L.Ed.2d 240 (1973); see also Biggans, supra, 638 F.2d at 607, n. 3 .
cited
Cited "see"
Hill v. Equitable Trust Co.
See United California Bank v. Salik, 481 F.2d 1012, 1015 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1004 , 94 S.Ct. 361 , 38 L.Ed.2d 240 (1973).
cited
Cited "see"
Securities & Exchange Commission v. Seaboard Corp.
See United California Bank v. Salik, 481 F.2d 1012 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1004 , 94 S.Ct. 361 , 38 L.Ed.2d 240 (1973).
cited
Cited "see"
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,722 Securities and Exchange Commission v. The Seaboard Corporation, Etc., Admiralty Fund and Admiralty Fund Growth Series Litigation Trust, Cross-Claimant/appellant v. Hugh Johnson & Company, Inc., Hugh Johnson, Norman Michael Keiser, and Ernst& Ernst, Cross-Defendants/appellees
See United California Bank v. Salik, 481 F.2d 1012 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1004 , 94 S.Ct. 361 , 38 L.Ed.2d 240 (1973).
cited
Cited "see"
Townsend v. Columbia Operations
See United California Bank v. Salik, 481 F.2d 1012 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1004 , 94 S.Ct. 361 , 38 L.Ed.2d 240 (1973).
cited
Cited "see"
Townsend v. Columbia Operations
See United California Bank v. Salik, 481 F.2d 1012 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1004 , 94 S.Ct. 361 , 38 L.Ed.2d 240 (1973).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hill v. Der
See United California Bank v. Salik, 481 F.2d 1012 (C.A.9), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1004 , 94 S.Ct. 361 , 38 L.Ed.2d 240 (1973); Williams v. Sinclair, 529 F.2d 1383 (C.A.9,1975), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 936 , 96 S.Ct. 2651 , 49 L.Ed.2d 388 (1976); Clegg v. Conk, 507 F.2d 1351 (C.A.10, 1974), cert. denied, 422 U.S. 1007 , 95 S.Ct. 2628 , 45 L.Ed.2d 669 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,379 John D. Robuck v. Dean Witter & Co., Inc., a Corporation, John D. Robuck v. Dean Witter & Co., Inc., a Corporation
See, United California Bank v. Salik, 481 F.2d 1012, 1015 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1004 , 94 S.Ct. 361 , 38 L.Ed.2d 240 (1973); Sackett v. Beaman, 399 F.2d 884, 890-91 (9th Cir. 1968); Turner v. Lundquist, supra. To the extent that some of the exchange rules require “due diligence” on the part of a broker, rather than merely refraining from fraudulent acts, any cause of action arising under them would be barred by the two-year state statute of limitations for negligence, Cal.Civ.Proc.
cited
Cited "see"
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 96,895 Margaret Morris v. Stifel, Nicolaus & Co., Inc., and Kingsley O. Wright, Sr., Mary A. Braun v. Stifel, Nicolaus & Co., Inc., Kingsley O. Wright, and Theodore Menas
See United California Bank v. Salik, 481 F.2d 1012, 1015 (9th Cir.), Cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1004 , 94 S.Ct. 361 , 38 L.Ed.2d 240 (1973).
cited
Cited "see"
Morris v. Stifel, Nicolaus & Co.
See United California Bank v. Salik, 481 F.2d 1012, 1015 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1004 , 94 S.Ct. 361 , 38 L.Ed.2d 240 (1973).
discussed
Cited "see"
Federal Trade Commission v. Texaco, Inc. Federal Trade Commission v. Standard Oil Company. Federal Trade Commission v. The Superior Oil Company, Inc., a Corporation. Federal Trade Commission v. Exxon Corporation, a Corporation. Federal Trade Commission v. Shell Oil Company, a Corporation. Federal Trade Commission v. Standard Oil Company of California, a Corporation. Federal Trade Commission v. Mobil Oil Corporation, a Corporation
See National Ass'n of Women & Children's Apparel Salesmen, Inc. v. FTC, 479 F.2d 139 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1004 , 94 S.Ct. 360 , 38 L.Ed.2d 240 (1973), where, in a collateral proceeding, the FTC relied heavily on a previous NLRB holding 151 384 U.S. at 422 , 86 S.Ct. at 1560 (emphasis added) 152 As mentioned earlier, a group of municipal distributor intervenors played a very active role in the proceedings.
discussed
Cited "see"
Federal Trade Commission v. Texaco, Inc.
See National Ass’n of Women & Children’s Apparel Salesmen, Inc. v. FTC, 479 F.2d 139 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1004 , 94 S.Ct. 360 , 38 L.Ed.2d 240 (1973), where, in a collateral proceeding, the FTC relied heavily on a previous NLRB holding. . 384 U.S. at 422 , 86 S.Ct. at 1560 (emphasis added). .
cited
Cited "see"
Briskin v. Ernst & Ernst
See United California Bank v. Salik, 481 F.2d 1012 (9th Cir. 1973), cert. denied 414 U.S. 1004 , 94 S.Ct. 361 , 38 L.Ed.2d 240 (1973).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Settles v. United States
See also United States v. Ruiz, 477 F.2d 918, 919 (2d Cir.) (paper with name and telephone number used to prove association not truth of matter asserted properly admitted), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1004 , 94 S.Ct. 361 , 38 L.Ed.2d 240 (1973).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Screen Advertising Film Fund Corp. v. Buena Vista Distribution Co.
See, e.g., Clark v. United Bank, 480 F.2d 235, 240 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1004 , 94 S.Ct. 360 , 38 L.Ed.2d 240 (1973).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Gayle King Shropshire
See also, United States v. Marra, 481 F.2d 1196, 1199 (6th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1004 , 94 S.Ct. 361 , 38 L.Ed.2d 240 (1973); United States v. Levinson, 405 F.2d 971, 977 (6th Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 395 U.S. 958 , 89 S.Ct. 2097 , 23 L.Ed.2d 744 (1969).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
National Association of Women's & Children's Apparel Salesmen, Inc.
v.
Federal Trade Commission
v.
Federal Trade Commission
No. 73-316.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 5, 1973.
414 U.S. 1004
Published
Citer courts: S.D. New York (1)
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.