green
Positive treatment
6.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1974 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1974
2000
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 27 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited "but see"
United States v. Black & Decker Manufacturing Co.
(4×)
also: Cited "see", Cited "see, e.g."
But see Missouri Portland Cement Co. v. Cargill, Inc., 498 F.2d 851, 860 (2d Cir.), cert, denied, 419 U.S. 883 , 95 S.Ct. 150 , 42 L.Ed.2d 123 (1974). 22 .
cited
Cited "see"
Brass v. American Film Technologies, Inc.
See Edina State Bank v. Mr. Steak, Inc., 487 F.2d 640, 644 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 883 , 95 S.Ct. 150 , 42 L.Ed.2d 123 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
Sanford Brass v. American Film Technologies, Inc.
See Edina State Bank v. Mr. Steak, Inc., 487 F.2d 640, 644 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 883 , 95 S.Ct. 150 , 42 L.Ed.2d 123 (1974). 11 In an order dated December 18, 1991, the district court rejected Brass' conversion claims.
discussed
Cited "see"
Northwestern National Insurance Co. v. Kezer
See Cummings Wholesale Electric Co. v. Home Owners Insurance Co., 492 F.2d 268 (7th Cir.1974), cert, denied, 419 U.S. 883 , 95 S.Ct. 149 , 42 L.Ed.2d 123 (1974) (claim of policyholder against reinsurer not preferred claim); Knickerbocker Agency, Inc. v. Holz, 4 N.Y.2d 245 , 173 N.Y.S.2d 602 , 149 N.E.2d 885 (1958) (liquidation statute grants court exclusive jurisdiction over assets to exclusion of arbitrator’s authority under private contract with insolvent insurance company).
cited
Cited "see"
Burlington Industries, Inc. v. Edelman
See Missouri Portland Cement Co. v. Cargill, Inc., 498 F.2d 851, 854 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 883 , 95 S.Ct. 150 , 42 L.Ed.2d 123 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
Avnet, Inc. v. Scope Industries
See Missouri Portland Cement Company v. Cargill, Incorporated, 498 F.2d 851, 873 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 883 , 95 S.Ct. 150 , 42 L.Ed.2d 123 (1974). 7 There appears to be no basis for requiring more when a private party initiates suit.
discussed
Cited "see"
Foremost Life Insurance v. Department of Insurance
See Cummings Wholesale Electric Company, Inc. v. Home Owners Insurance Company, 492 F.2d 268 (7th Cir. 1974) cert. denied, Delphi Community School Building Corp. v. Northeastern Insurance Company of Hartford, 419 U.S. 883 , 95 S.Ct. 149 , 42 L.Ed.2d 123 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 96,589 Jo v. Seibert v. Sperry Rand Corporation and James D. Finley
Although the underlying philosophy of federal securities regulations is that of full disclosure, Kennecott Copper Corp. v. Curtiss-Wright Corp., 584 F.2d 1195, 1199 (2d Cir. 1978), “there is no duty to disclose information to one who reasonably should already be aware of it.” Myzel v. Fields, 386 F.2d 718, 736 (8th Cir. 1967), cert, denied, 390 U.S. 951 , 88 S.Ct. 1043 , 19 L.Ed.2d 1143 (1968); see Missouri Portland Cement Co. v. Cargill, Inc., 498 F.2d 851, 873 (2d Cir.), cert, denied, 419 U.S. 883 , 95 S.Ct. 150 , 42 L.Ed.2d 123 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
Kennecott Copper Corporation v. Curtiss-Wright Corporation
See Missouri Portland Cement Co. v. Cargill, Inc., 498 F.2d 851, 868-70 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 883 , 95 S.Ct. 150 , 42 L.Ed.2d 123 (1974); FTC v. PepsiCo, Inc., 447 F.2d 24 , 28-31 (2d Cir. 1973).
cited
Cited "see"
DeWitt v. AMERICAN STOCK TR. CO.
See Edina State Bank v. Mr. Steak, Inc., 487 F.2d 640 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 883 , 95 S.Ct. 150 , 42 L.Ed.2d 123 (1974).
cited
Cited "see"
Dewitt v. American Stock Transfer Co.
See Edina State Bank v. Mr. Steak, Inc., 487 F.2d 640 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 883 , 95 S.Ct. 150 , 42 L.Ed.2d 123 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
VERNON J. ROCKLER & CO., INC. v. Minneapolis Shareholders Co.
See, Missouri Portland Cement Co. v. Cargill, Inc., 498 F.2d 851 (2nd Cir. 1974) cert. denied, 419 U.S. 883 , 95 S.Ct. 150 , 42 L.Ed.2d 123 (1974) and Commonwealth Oil Refining Co., Inc. v. Tesoro Petroleum Corp., 394 F.Supp. 267 (S.D.N.Y. 1975).
cited
Cited "see"
Federal Trade Commission v. Atlantic Richfield Company and the Anaconda Company
See Missouri Portland Cement Co. v. Cargill, Inc., 498 F.2d 851, 857, 863 (2 Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 833 , 95 S.Ct. 150 , 42 L.Ed.2d 123 (1974); United States v. Black & Decker Mfg.
discussed
Cited "see"
Applied Digital Data Systems Inc. v. Milgo Electronic Corp.
See Missouri Portland Cement Co. v. Cargill, Inc., 498 F.2d 851, 871 (2d Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 883 , 95 S.Ct. 150 , 42 L.Ed.2d 123 (1974); Gulf & Western Indus., Inc. v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., 476 F.2d 687 , 695-96 (2d Cir. 1973); GAF Corp. v. Milstein, 453 F.2d 709, 719-20 (2d Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 910 , 92 S.Ct. 1610 , 31 L.Ed.2d 821 (1972) (target corporation has standing to assert violations of sections 14(d) & (e) and 13(d)); Butler Aviation Int’l, Inc. v. Comprehensive Designers, Inc., 425 F.2d 842 , 843 n.1 (2d Cir. 1970) (target corporation has st…
discussed
Cited "see"
CHARTER OAK BK. & TRUST CO. v. Registrar & Transfer Co.
See Edina State Bank v. Mr. Steak, Inc. 487 F. 2d 640, 644 (10 Cir.1974) cert. den. 419 U.S. 883 , 95 S.Ct. 150 , 42 L.Ed. 2d 123 (1974). [3] However, where state law cannot be harmonized *434 with, or would be in conflict with, the Securities Act, the state law must yield to the federal law.
discussed
Cited "see"
Otis Elevator Co. v. United Technologies Corp.
However, the Court will also consider the general condition of this tender offer in light of all the foregoing events. 12 The Applicable Standard It is clear in this Circuit that a preliminary injunction will issue against *965 the consummation of an ongoing tender offer “only upon a clear showing of either (1) probable success on the merits and possible irreparable injury, or (2) sufficiently serious questions going to the merits to make them a fair ground for litigation and a balance of hardships tipping decidedly toward the party requesting the preliminary relief.” Sonesta International…
discussed
Cited "see"
Copperweld Corporation v. Imetal
Corenco Corp. v. Schiavone & Sons, Inc., 362 F.Supp. 939 (S.D.N.Y.1973), aff’d, 488 F.2d 207 (2 Cir. 1973); see Missouri Portland Cement Co. v. Cargill, Inc., 375 F.Supp. 249 (S.D.N.Y.1974), aff’d in part, rev’d in part, 498 F.2d 851 (2 Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 833 , 95 S. Ct. 150 , 42 L.Ed.2d 123 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
Commonwealth Oil Refining Co. v. Tesoro Petroleum Corp.
Accord, Missouri Portland Cement Co. v. Cargill, Inc., 498 F.2d 851, 866 (2 Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 883 , 95 S.Ct. 150 , 42 L.Ed.2d 123 (1974); Gulf & Western Industries, Inc. v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., 476 F.2d 687, 692-93 (2 Cir. 1973); Broder v. Dane, 384 F.Supp. 1312, 1317 (S.D.N.Y.1974); General Host Corp. v. Triumph American, Inc., 359 F.Supp. 749, 753 (S.D.N.Y.1973).
discussed
Cited "see"
Broder v. Dane
Accord, Missouri Portland Cement Co. v. Cargill, Inc., 498 F.2d 851, 866 (2d Cir.), cert. denied,-U.S.-, 95 S.Ct. 150 , 42 L.Ed.2d 123 (1974); Gulf & Western Industries, Inc. v. The Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., 476 F.2d 687, 692-693 (2d Cir. 1973); General Host Corp. v. Triumph American, Inc., 359 F.Supp. 749, 753 (S.D.N.Y. 1973).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Azurite Corp. Ltd. v. Amster & Co.
Electronic Specialty Co. v. International Controls Corp., 409 F.2d 937, 948 (2d Cir.1969) ("It would be as serious an infringement of these regulations to overstate the definiteness of the plans as to understate them."); see also Missouri Portland Cement Co. v. Cargill, Inc., 498 F.2d 851, 872 (2d Cir.1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 883 , 95 S.Ct. 150 , 42 L.Ed.2d 123 (1974); Susquehanna Corp. v. Pan American Sulphur Co., 423 F.2d 1075, 1085-86 (5th Cir.1970). 20 Subsequent cases have followed a similar path, even after Item 4 was amended in 1978.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Azurite Corp. v. Amster & Co.
Electronic Specialty Co. v. International Controls Corp., 409 F.2d 937, 948 (2d Cir.1969) (“It would be as serious an infringement of these regulations to overstate the definiteness of the plans as to understate them.”); see also Missouri Portland Cement Co. v. Cargill, Inc., 498 F.2d 851, 872 (2d Cir.1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 883 , 95 S.Ct. 150 , 42 L.Ed.2d 123 (1974); Susquehanna Corp. v. Pan American Sulphur Co., 423 F.2d 1075, 1085-86 (5th Cir.1970).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Royal Crown Cola Co., Cross-Appellant v. The Coca-Cola Company, Pepsico, Inc., and Dr. Pepper Co., Cross-Appellees
Compare e.g., Missouri Portland Cement Co. v. Cargill, Inc., 498 F.2d 851 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 883 , 95 S.Ct. 150 , 42 L.Ed.2d 123 (1974) with FTC Dkt.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Charles Woods v. Evansville Press Company, Inc., the E.W. Scripps Company
New York Times, supra, 376 U.S. at 266 , 84 S.Ct. at 718 ; see also, Perry v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc., 499 F.2d 797, 802 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 883 , 95 S.Ct. 150 , 42 L.Ed.2d 123 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 96,833 Prudent Real Estate Trust v. Johncamp Realty, Inc.
From the beginning of litigation under the Williams Act, this court has been conscious of its responsibility not to allow management to “resort to the courts on trumped-up or trivial grounds as a means for delaying and thereby defeating legitimate tender offers.” Electronic Specialty Co. v. International Controls Corp., 409 F.2d 937, 947 (1969); see also Missouri Portland Cement Co. v. Cargill, Inc., 498 F.2d 851, 854, 873 , cert. denied, 419 U.S. 883 , 95 S.Ct. 150 , 42 L.Ed.2d 123 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hutchinson v. Proxmire
Corp., 396 F.Supp. 1042, 1053 (S.D.N.Y.1975), aff’d, 538 F.2d 309 (2d Cir. 1976); see also, Perry v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc., 499 F.2d 797 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 883 , 95 S.Ct. 150 , 42 L.Ed.2d 123 (1974); Cervantes v. Time, Inc., 464 F.2d 986 (8th Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1125 , 93 S.Ct. 939 , 35 L.Ed.2d 257 (1973); Washington Post Co. v. Keogh, 125 U.S.App.D.C. 32 , 365 F.2d 965, 968 (1966), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 1011 , 87 S.Ct. 708 , 17 L.Ed.2d 548 (1967).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Anaconda Co. v. Crane Co.
Compare Missouri Portland Cement Co. v. Cargill, Inc., 498 F.2d 851, 873 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 883 , 95 S.Ct. 150 , 42 L.Ed.2d 123 (1974) with Mills v. Electric Autolite Co., 403 F.2d 429 (7th Cir. 1968), rev’d on other grounds, 396 U.S. 375 , 90 S.Ct. 616 , 24 L.Ed.2d 593 (1970).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Guitar v. Westinghouse Electric Corporation
See, e. g., Perry v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc., 499 F.2d 797 (7th Cir.), cert, denied, 419 U.S. 883 , 95 S.Ct. 150 , 42 L.Ed. 2d 123 (1974) ; Cervantes v. Time, Inc., 464 F.2d 986 (8th Cir. 1972), cert, denied, 409 U.S. 1125 , 93 S.Ct. 939 , 35 L.Ed.2d 257 (1973) ; Miller v. News Syndicate Co., 445 F.2d 356 (2d Cir. 1971) ; Bon Air Hotel, Inc. v. Time, Inc., 426 F.2d 858 (5th Cir. 1970) ; Time, Inc. v. McLaney, 406 F.2d *1054 565 (5th Cir.), cert, denied, 395 U.S. 922 , 89 S.Ct. 1776 , 23 L.Ed.2d 239 (1969) ; Thompson v. Evening Star Newspaper Co., 129 U.S. App.D.C. 299, 394 E.2d 774,…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Missouri Portland Cement Co.
v.
Cargill, Inc.
v.
Cargill, Inc.
No. 73-2014.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 15, 1974.
Certiorari, Consideration, Douglas, Took.
Cited by 62 opinions | Published
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
Mr. Justice Douglas and Mr. Justice Brennan would grant certiorari. Mr. Justice Blackmun took no part in the[*884] consideration or decision of this petition.