green
Positive treatment
3.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1974 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1974
2000
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
COUNTY EXEC., PRINCE GEO'S CTY. v. Doe
First, relying on its earlier decision in Nyberg v. City of Virginia, 495 F.2d 1342 (8th Cir.1974), appeal dismissed for want of jurisdiction and cert. denied, 419 U.S. 891 , 95 S.Ct. 169 , 42 L.Ed.2d 136 *463 (1974), in which it had invalidated a prohibition of all non-therapeutic abortions at a city-owned hospital, 14 the Eighth Circuit in Poelker held “the city’s policy prohibiting all nontherapeutic abortions in its publicly owned hospitals to be unconstitutional as an unwarranted infringement on pregnant women’s right to privacy” recognized in Roe v. Wade, supra. See 515 F.2d at 5…
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Doe v. Bridgeton Hospital Ass'n, Inc.
Nyberg v. City of Virginia, 495 F. 2d 1342 (8th Cir.), appeal dismissed, 419 U.S. 891 , 95 S.Ct. 169 , 42 L.Ed. 2d 136 *491 (1974); Doe v. Hale Hospital, 500 F. 2d 144 (1st Cir.1974), cert. den. 420 U.S. 907 , 95 S.Ct. 825 , 42 L.Ed. 2d 837 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
Planned Parenthood Ass'n/Chicago Area v. Chicago Transit Authority
See Impeach Nixon Committee v. Buck, 498 F.2d 37, 38 (7th Cir.1974), cert. granted, 416 U.S. 978 , 94 S.Ct. 2378 , 40 L.Ed.2d 756 (1974), remanded, 419 U.S. 891 , 95 S.Ct. 169 , 42 L.Ed.2d 136 (1974) (dismissed as moot by the Seventh Circuit in unpublished order of *553 Dec. 5, 1979); Coalition For Abortion-Rights and Against Sterilization Abuse v. Niagara Frontier Transportation Authority, 584 F.Supp. 985 (W.D.N.Y.1984) (unconstitutional to reject message promoting abortion); Gay Activists Alliance of Washington, D.C., Inc. v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority, Civ.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
John Peter Galanis v. Ermen Pallanck, U.S. Marshal for the District of Connecticut
See also Hayles v. United States, 419 U.S. 892 , 95 S.Ct. 168 , 42 L.Ed.2d 136 (1974); Ackerson v. United States, 419 U.S. 1099 , 95 S.Ct. 769 , 42 L.Ed.2d 796 (1975); Watts v. United States, 422 U.S. 1032 , 95 S.Ct. 2648 , 45 L.Ed.2d 688 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Wolfe v. Schroering
See, e. g., Nyberg v. City of Virginia, 495 F.2d 1342, 1346 (8th Cir.), appeal dismissed, 419 U.S. 891 , 95 S.Ct. 169 , 42 L.Ed.2d 136 (1974); Orr v. Koefoot, 377 F.Supp. 673 , 679 n. 6 (D.Neb.1974); Roe v. Arizona Bd. of Regents, 23 Ariz.App. 477 , 534 P.2d 285, 291 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Wolfe v. Schroering
See, e. g., Nyberg v. City of Virginia, 495 F.2d 1342, 1346 (8th Cir.), appeal dismissed, 419 U.S. 891 , 95 S.Ct. 169 , 42 L.Ed.2d 136 (1974); Orr v. Koefoot, 377 F.Supp. 673 , 679 n. 6 (D.Neb.1974); Roe v. Arizona Bd. of Regents, 23 Ariz.App. 477 , 534 P.2d 285, 291 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Watts v. United States
See also Hayles v. United States , 419 U.S. 892 , 95 S.Ct. 168 , 42 L.Ed.2d 136 (1974); Ackerson v. United States , 419 U.S. 1099 , 95 S.Ct. 769 , 42 L.Ed.2d 796 (1975). 6 * The policy upon which the Government relies was first promulgated shortly after our decisions in Abbate and Bartkus, supra , in a memorandum from Attorney General Rogers to United States Attorneys.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Huffman
v.
Pursue, Ltd.
v.
Pursue, Ltd.
No. 73-296.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 21, 1974.
Douglas.
Cited by 52 opinions | Published
Appeal from D. C. N. D. Ohio. [Probable jurisdiction noted, 415 U. S. 974.] Brief for appellants does not comply with this Court’s Rules 39 and 40 with respect to conciseness, statement of questions without unnecessary detail, and printing of appendices thereto. Accordingly, as provided in paragraph 5 of Rule 40, brief of appellants is hereby stricken. Counsel for appellants may file a brief complying with the Rules within 20 days of the date of this order. Oral argument will be allowed only by counsel who have filed briefs that conform to the Rules.
Mr. Justice Douglas dissents.