green
Positive treatment
Circuit Split
Quoted verbatim 1×
4.2 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 1975 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1975
2000
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 18 distinct citers.
cited
Cited "but see"
Scheib v. Grant
But see Simpson v. Simpson, 490 F.2d 803, 810 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 897 , 95 S.Ct. 176 , 42 L.Ed.2d 141 (1974).
discussed
Cited "but see"
Sandra Boddie v. American Broadcasting Companies, Inc. Geraldo Rivera Charles C. Thompson and Maravilla Production Company, Inc.
(2×)
But see Simpson v. Simpson, 490 F.2d 803 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 897 , 95 S.Ct. 176 , 42 L.Ed.2d 141 (1974) 4 Our holding is consistent with Brown v. American B'dcasting Cos., 704 F.2d 1296 , 1305 (4th Cir.1983).
discussed
Cited "but see"
United States v. Grosskreutz
But see United States v. Martinez-Miramontes, 494 F.2d 808 (9th Cir. 1974), cert. denied 419 U.S. 897 , 95 S.Ct. 176 , 42 L.Ed.2d 141 (1974), in which the Ninth Circuit had previously held that no prohibited search was involved when a customs officer sniffed around a crevice in the trunk of an automobile.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
State v. Ohnmacht
the rule that the penalty of a sentence cannot be increased after the sentence is being served is applicable only when the sentence is legal and valid and within the minimum and maximum statutory sanction.
discussed
Cited "see"
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Michael K. Thomas and Richard L. Sawyer, and Roger J. Houdek
See United States v. Downen, 496 F.2d 314, 319 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 897 , 95 S.Ct. 177 , 42 L.Ed.2d 142 (1974); see also Sil-Flo, Inc. v. SFHC, Inc., 917 F.2d at 1514 (absent references to the record, we defer to trial court’s rulings).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Pellicci
See United States v. Martinez-Miramontes, 494 F.2d 808, 810 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 897 (1974) (no search where officer smells marijuana odor emanating from vehicle); United States v. Fisch, 474 F.2d 1071, 1076-79 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 412 U.S. 921 (1973) (officers overhearing incriminating conversation taking place in neighboring hotel room not conducting search in absence of trespass).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Larry Davis
See Garcia v. United States, 492 F.2d 395, 397-98 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 897 , 95 S.Ct. 178 , 42 L.Ed.2d 142 (1974); Caille v. United States, 487 F.2d 614, 616 (5th Cir. 1973); United States v. Thomas, 474 F.2d 1336 (2d Cir. 1973), aff’g, 356 F.Supp. 173, 174 (E.D.N.Y. 1972). 9 This Court at that time found those decisions and their result to be sound; nothing presented here persuades us to the contrary, nor that this case should not be controlled by Brock .
cited
Cited "see"
American Can Co. v. National Labor Relations Board
See NLRB v. Hudson Berlind Corp., 494 F.2d 1200, 1202-03 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 897 , 95 S.Ct. 176 , 42 L.Ed.2d 141 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
ca2 1976
See NLRB v. Hudson Berlind Corp., 494 F.2d 1200, 1202-03 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 897 , 95 S.Ct. 176 , 42 L.Ed.2d 141 (1974). 18 The Administrative Law Judge recognized that even though the Company was not required to recognize ALA as the bargaining agent for lithographers at Regency because that plant was not a continuation of the Hudson operation, the Company was still required to bargain with ALA regarding the effect on Hudson lithographers of the closing there.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Martineau v. McKenzie-Willamette Medical Center
Compare Baugh, 730 F3d at 708 (answering both in the negative), with United States v. Downen, 496 F2d 314, 321 (10th Cir), cert den, 419 US 897 (1974) (answering both in the affirmative).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Pollock v. Pollock
See, e.g., Simpson v. Simpson, 490 F.2d 803 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 897 , 95 S.Ct. 176 , 42 L.Ed.2d 141 (1974); U.S. v. Harpel, 493 F.2d 346 (10th Cir.1974); Anonymous v. Anonymous, 558 F.2d 677 (2d Cir.1977); Epps v. St.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Janecka v. Franklin
See also Simpson v. Simpson, 490 F.2d 803, 805 (CA5), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 897 , 95 S.Ct. 176 , 42 L.Ed.2d 141 (1974).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Fred A. Shelton
See also United States v. Downen, 496 F.2d 314, 319 (10th Cir.1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 897 , 95 S.Ct. 177 , 42 L.Ed.2d 142 (1974).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Citron v. Citron
Compare Simpson v. Simpson (5th Cir. 1974) 490 F.2d 803 , cert. denied, 419 U.S. 897 , 95 S.Ct. 176 , 42 L.Ed.2d 141 with Kratz v. Kratz, supra. 3 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Jandak v. Village of Brookfield
See, e. g., Simpson v. Simpson, 490 F.2d 803 (5th Cir.), cert. den. 419 U.S. 897 , 95 S.Ct. 176 , 42 L.Ed.2d 141 (1974); Anonymous v. Anonymous, 558 F.2d 677 (2d Cir. 1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Beard v. Akzona, Inc.
Compare Simpson v. Simpson, 490 F.2d 803 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 897 , 95 S.Ct. 176 , 42 L.Ed.2d 141 (1974); Anonymous v. Anonymous, 558 F.2d 677 (2d Cir. 1977) with United States v. Jones, 542 F.2d 661 (6th Cir. 1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
People v. Castro
(2×)
(United States v. McKinley, 493 F.2d 547, 550-551 .) And federal courts have held that denial of defense inquiry into a witness’ address is not error where defense counsel has already clearly placed that witness ‘in his proper setting.’ (United States v. Alston, 460 F.2d 48, 52 , cert. den., 409 U.S. 871 [ 34 L.Ed.2d 122 , 93 S.Ct. 200 ]; United States v. Daddano, 432 F.2d 1119, 1128 , cert. den., 402 U.S. 905 [ 28 L.Ed.2d 645 , 91 S.Ct. 1366 ]; see also United States v. Penick, 496 F.2d 1105, 1108 , cert. den., 419 U.S. 897 [ 42 L.Ed.2d 141 , 95 S.Ct. 177 ].) [¶] In the case at hand, d…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
People v. Mardian
(United States v. McKinley, 493 F.2d 547, 550-551 .) And federal courts have held that denial of defense inquiry into a witness’ address is not error where defense counsel has already clearly placed that witness “in his proper setting.” (United States v. Alston, 460 F.2d 48, 52 , cert, den., 409 U.S. 871 [ 34 L.Ed.2d 122 , 93 S.Ct. 200 ]; United States v. Daddano, 432 F.2d 1119, 1128 , cert, den., 402 U.S. 905 [ 28 L.Ed.2d 645 , 91 S.Ct. 1366 ]; see also United States v. Penick, 496 F.2d 1105, 1108 , cert, den., 419 U.S. 897 [ 42 L.Ed.2d 141 , 95 S.Ct. 177 ].) *41 In the case at hand, de…
Hudson Berlind Corp.
v.
National Labor Relations Board
v.
National Labor Relations Board
No. 73-2054.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 21, 1974.
419 U.S. 897
Published
Citer courts: Supreme Court of Iowa (1)
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.