green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
5.2 score
“to assume ... that the mere passage of a specific statute covering an area of conduct also regulated by a more general statute limits enforcement of the general statute ... is, in effect, to accomplish a partial repeal of the general statute.”
Treatment trajectory · 1975 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1975
2000
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Eugene Boffa, Sr., Robert Boffa, Sr., Louis S. Kalmar, Sr., and Chandler Lemon
to assume ... that the mere passage of a specific statute covering an area of conduct also regulated by a more general statute limits enforcement of the general statute ... is, in effect, to accomplish a partial repeal of the general statute.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Phillip L. Segal
See 1970 U.S.Code Cong. & Ad.News 4394-4416. “[RJepeals by implication are not favored, and effect should be given to overlapping statutes where possible,” Jones, 607 F.2d at 272 (citing United States v. Burnett, 505 F.2d 815, 816 (9th Cir.1974), cert. denied, 420 U.S. 966 , 95 S.Ct. 1361 , 43 L.Ed.2d 445 (1975)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Levitt v. State of Maryland Deposit Insurance Fund Corp.
See Deyermond v. State, 19 Md.App. 698, 703 , 313 A.2d 709, 712 (1974), cert. denied, 420 U.S. 966 , 95 S.Ct. 1360 , 43 L.Ed.2d 445 (1975); Waller v. State, 13 Md.App. 615, 624 , 284 A.2d 446, 450 (1971).
cited
Cited "see"
Bobby Ray Speedy v. Donald W. Wyrick, Warden, Missouri State Penitentiary John Ashcroft, Attorney General
See generally Crenshaw v. Wolff, 504 F.2d 377, 380 (8th Cir.1974), cert. denied, 420 U.S. 966 , 95 S.Ct. 1361 , 43 L.Ed.2d 445 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
Kenneth H. Schlomann v. George A. Ralston, Jr., Warden, United States Medical Center for Federal Prisoners, Kenneth H. Schlomann v. United States Board of Parole, G. A. Ralston, Jr., Warden
See Crenshaw v. Wolff, 504 F.2d 377, 380 (8th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 420 U.S. 966 , 95 S.Ct. 1361 , 43 L.Ed.2d 445 (1975); United States v. Easter, 539 F.2d 663, 666 (8th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 844 , 98 S.Ct. 145 , 54 L.Ed.2d 109 (1977); Plant v. Wyrick, 636 F.2d 188, 189 (8th Cir. 1980). 12 The two claims expressly raised in Schlomann's March, 1981, petition do not merit habeas relief.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Courtney
Compare United States v. Burnett, 505 F.2d 815 (9th Cir. 1974), cert. denied sub nom., Lyon v. United States, 420 U.S. 966 , 95 S.Ct. 1361 , 43 L.Ed.2d 445 (1975).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Blaine
v.
McGraw Edison Co., Food Equipment Division
v.
McGraw Edison Co., Food Equipment Division
No. 74-5871.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 3, 1975.
Published
Citer courts: Third Circuit (1)
App. Div., Sup. Ct. N. Y., 4th Jud. Dept. Certiorari denied.