green
Positive treatment
7.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1975 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1975
2000
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 23 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
State v. Jennett
(2×)
The interviewer inten tionally lied to defendant telhng him the State had a search warrant for his apartment though it did not. 3 See id.; but see State v. Boren, 224 N.W.2d 14, 16 (Iowa 1974), cert. denied, 422 U.S. 1008 , 95 S.Ct. 2630 , 45 L.Ed.2d 671 (1975).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
United States v. Donald Laverne Carlson, United States of America v. Gary Clarend Hofstad
United States v. Mayes, 512 F.2d 637, 648-51 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 422 U.S. 1008 , 95 S.Ct. 2629 , 45 L.Ed.2d 670 *1359 (1975); cf. Douglas v. Alabama, supra, 380 U.S. at 420, 85 S.Ct. 1074 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. William Poulos
(2×)
See United States v. Mayes, 512 F.2d 637, 647 (6th Cir.)(citations omitted), cert. denied, 422 U.S. 1008 , 95 S.Ct. 2629 , 45 L.Ed.2d 670 (1975).
cited
Cited "see"
International Union v. National Right to Work Legal Defense & Education Foundation, Inc.
See 510 F.2d 1239 (D.C.Cir.1975), cert, denied, 422 U.S. 1008 , 95 S.Ct. 2631 , 45 L.Ed.2d 671 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
Dale Matthew Olson v. Leslie Green, Chairman of Minnesota Board of Corrections, and Warren Spannaus, Attorney General of the State of Minnesota
(2×)
See United States v. Mayes, 512 F.2d 637, 650-51 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 422 U.S. 1008 , 95 S.Ct. 2629 , 45 L.Ed.2d 670 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
George Tolbert v. Arnold R. Jago, Supt.
(2×)
See United States v. West, supra. 25 Under these circumstances and for the additional reasons set forth in the opinion of the District Judge, the judgment of the District Court is affirmed. 26 ENGEL, Circuit Judge, concurring. 27 The technique of interrogation in this case 1 is perilously close to that condemned in Douglas v. Alabama, 380 U.S. 415 , 417-20 & n. 3, 85 S.Ct. 1074 , 13 L.Ed.2d 934 (1965), and in United States v. Mayes, 512 F.2d 637, 648-51 (6th Cir.), Cert. denied, 422 U.S. 1008 , 95 S.Ct. 2629 , 45 L.Ed.2d 670 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Adele Halkin
(2×)
See National Right to Work Legal Defense and Education Foundation, Inc. v. Richey, 167 U.S.App.D.C. 18, 24 , 510 F.2d 1239, 1245 , Cert. denied, 422 U.S. 1008 , 95 S.Ct. 2631 , 45 L.Ed.2d 671 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
Mary Granger v. Alfred Marek, Gerald Kobey, Larry Griffith, Burton Roth
(2×)
See Mandel v. Nouse, 509 F.2d 1031 (6th Cir.), Cert. denied, 422 U.S. 1008 , 95 S.Ct. 2630 , 45 L.Ed.2d 671 (1975); Berberian v. Gibney, 514 F.2d 790 (1st Cir. 1975). 14 The district court's second premise, that the appellee IRS agents were Government officials entitled to claim the immunity, was based on the district court's determination that immunity should be extended to Internal Revenue Service agents because 15 (t)he implicit nature of the duties performed by the . . . investigatory agents of the IRS makes them particularly susceptible to suit by those who may be investigated.
discussed
Cited "see"
Matter of DAS
See State v. Boren, 224 N.W.2d 14 (Iowa), cert. denied, 422 U.S. 1008 , 95 S.Ct. 2630 , 45 L.Ed.2d 671 (1975) (Officers falsely told defendant accused of incest that his daughter had passed a lie detector test); McGee v. State, 2 Tenn.Cr.
discussed
Cited "see"
In re D. A. S.
See State v. Boren, 224 N.W.2d 14 (Iowa), cert. denied, 422 U.S. 1008 , 95 S.Ct. 2630 , 45 L.Ed.2d 671 (1975) (Officers falsely told defendant accused of incest that his daughter had passed a lie detector test); McGee v. State, 2 Tenn.Cr.
discussed
Cited "see"
Sanabria v. United States
(2×)
United States v. Tanner, 471 F. 2d 128 , 141 n. 21 (CA7), cert. denied, 409 U. S. 949 (1972); see United States v. Mayes, 512 F. 2d 637 , 652 (CA6), cert. denied, 422 U. S. 1008 (1975); United States v. Young, 503 F. 2d 1072, 1075 (CA3 1974); United States v. Cohen, 197 F. 2d 26 (CA3 1952).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Gross
(2×)
See United States v. Mayes, 512 F.2d 637 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 422 U.S. 1008 , 95 S.Ct. 2629 , 45 L.Ed.2d 670 (1975); United States v. Sockel, 478 F.2d 1134 (8th Cir. 1973). 16 .
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Jacoby
Id., 217 N.W.2d at 597 ; see State v. Boren, 224 N.W.2d 14, 16 (Iowa 1974), cert. den., 422 U.S. 1008 , 95 S.Ct. 2630 , 45 L.Ed.2d 671 (1975).
cited
Cited "see"
The Value House, a Corporation v. Phillips Mercantile Company, D/B/A Value House
See Waddell v. Fleming, 510 F.2d 4, 7 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 422 U.S. 1007 , 95 S.Ct. 2629 , 45 L.Ed.2d 670 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
People v. Roberts
The Vandetti decision further holds that, even when the trial court in its discretion finds a legitimate reason for the prosecution to call a recalcitrant witness to the stand, once "it is clear the witness is unwilling to testify, that fact is the only relevant testimony beyond identity the witness can give, and continued questioning cannot be for the purpose of eliciting relevant testimony but only for the purpose of creating prejudice” (id., p 1150 [emphasis supplied]; see also, United States v Mayes, 512 F2d 637, 649-650, cert denied 422 US 1008 ).
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Truong Dinh Hung, United States of America v. Ronald Louis Humphrey
(4×)
See, e. g., United States v. Mayes, 512 F.2d 637 , 648 n.6 (6 Cir.), cert. denied, 422 U.S. 1008 , 95 S.Ct. 2629 , 45 L.Ed.2d 670 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Curtis Lee Mayes, Cross-Appellee v. Dewey Sowders, Warden, Cross-Appellant
(2×)
See also, United States v. Mayes, 512 F.2d 637, 648-50 (6th Cir.), cert. den., 422 U.S. 1008 , 95 S.Ct. 2629 , 45 L.Ed.2d 670 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Heinz
See, e.g., United States v. Mayes, 512 F.2d 637, 652 (6th Cir.), cert, denied, 422 U.S. 1008 (1975); Sanchez v. United States, 341 F.2d 225, 227 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 856 (1965); State v. Pianfetti, 79 Vt. 236, 241 , 65 A. 84, 85 (1906); cf. State v. Kowal, 116 N.H. 699, 700 , 366 A.2d 877, 879 (1976) (collateral estoppel).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Sandy
(2×)
See also United States v. Mayes, 512 F.2d 637, 642-43 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 422 U.S. 1008 , 95 S.Ct. 2629 , 45 L.Ed.2d 670 & 423 U.S. 840 , 96 S.Ct. 69 , 46 L.Ed.2d 59 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Jerome Sandy and American International Pictures Exchange of Washington, D. C., United States of America v. Ellis Gordon, United States of America v. Marvin Zide and Allied Film Exchange, Inc., United States of America v. John O. Glaus, United States of America v. Marvin Friedlander and Marvin Films
(2×)
See also United States v. Mayes, 512 F.2d 637, 642-43 (6th Cir.), Cert. denied, 422 U.S. 1008 , 95 S.Ct. 2629 , 45 L.Ed.2d 670 & 423 U.S. 840 , 96 S.Ct. 69 , 46 L.Ed.2d 59 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Masri v. United States
See, e. g., United States v. Mayes, 512 F. 2d 637 (CA6), cert. denied, 422 U. S. 1008 (1975); United States v. Infelice, 506 F. 2d 1358 (CA7 1974), cert. denied, 419 U. S. 1107 (1975); United States v. De Betham, 470 F. 2d 1367 (CA9 1972), cert. denied, 412 U. S. 907 (1973); and United States v. Wainwright, 413 F. 2d 796 (CA10 1969), cert. denied, 396 U. S. 1009 (1970).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Harry R. Haldeman, United States of America v. John D. Ehrlichman, United States of America v. John N. Mitchell, United States of America v. Harry R. Haldeman and John D. Ehrlichman, Nos. 75-1381, 75-1382, 75-1384 and 76-1441.united States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Mayes, 512 F.2d 637 , 644 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 422 U.S. 1008 , 95 S.Ct. 2629 , 45 L.Ed.2d 670 (1975), and 423 U.S. 840 , 96 S.Ct. 69 , 46 L.Ed.2d 59 (1975); United States v. Williams, 463 F.2d 393, 395 (10th Cir. 1972); United States v. Crutcher, 405 F.2d 239, 245 (2d Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 394 U.S. 908 , 89 S.Ct. 1018 , 22 L.Ed.2d 219 (1969); 2 C.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Haldeman
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Mayes, 512 F.2d 637 , 644 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 422 U.S. 1008 , 95 S.Ct. 2629 , 45 L.Ed.2d 670 (1975), and 423 U.S. 840 , 96 S.Ct. 69 , 46 L.Ed.2d 59 (1975); United States v. Williams, 463 F.2d 393, 395 (10th Cir. 1972); United States v. Crutcher, 405 F.2d 239, 245 (2d Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 394 U.S. 908 , 89 S.Ct. 1018 , 22 L.Ed.2d 219 (1969); 2 C.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Mayes
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 74-1224.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 16, 1975.
Cited by 8 opinions | Published
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 512 F. 2d 637.