green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
3.7 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 1960 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1960
1993
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 14 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "but see"
Toilet Goods Ass'n v. Gardner
But see Ove Gustavsson Contracting Co. v. Floete, 278 F.2d 912 (2 Cir.), cert. denied, 364 U.S. 894 , 81 S.Ct. 225 , 5 L.Ed.2d 188 (1960).
cited
Cited "but see"
Toilet Goods Association v. Gardner
But see Ove Gustavsson Contracting Co. v. Floete, 278 F.2d 912 (2 Cir.), cert. denied, 364 U.S. 894 , 81 S.Ct. 225 , 5 L.Ed.2d 188 (1960).
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Serra v. United States General Services Administration
a request for a declaratory judgment upon a contract to which the government is a party is plainly a request for relief against the united states.
cited
Cited "see"
In re Ampicillin Antitrust Litigation
See Rogers v. Societe Internationale, 107 U.S.App.D.C. 388 , 278 F.2d 268 , cert, denied, 364 U.S. 895 , 81 S.Ct. 223 , 5 L.Ed.2d 189 (1960).
discussed
Cited "see"
Tempo Trucking and Transfer Corp. v. Dickson
See Ove Gustavsson Contracting Co. v. Floete, 278 F.2d 912 (2d Cir. 1960), cert. denied, 364 U.S. 894 , 81 S.Ct. 225 , 5 L.Ed.2d 188 (1960) ; Cappadora v. Celebrezze, 356 F.2d 1 (2d Cir. 1966) ; Toilet Goods Assoc. v. Gardner, 360 F.2d 677 (2d Cir. 1966), aff'd, 387 U.S. 158 , 87 S.Ct. 1520 , 18 L.Ed. 2d 697 (1967) ; Citizenz Committee For Hudson Valley v. Volpe, 425 F.2d 97 (2d Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 949 , 91 S. Ct. 237 , 27 L.Ed.2d 256 (1970) ; Aquavella v. Richardson, supra; Mills v. Richardson, 464 F.2d 995 (2d Cir. 1972) ; Aguayo v. Richardson, 473 F.2d 1090 (2d Cir. 1973). 9 …
discussed
Cited "see"
John P. King v. The United States
See Ove Gustavsson Contracting Co. v. Floete, 278 F.2d 912 (C.A.2), cert. denied, 364 U.S. 894 , 81 S.Ct. 225 , 5 L.Ed.2d 188 (1960) (amount in contract suit exceeded $10,000); Powers v. United States, 218 F.2d 828 (C.A.7, 1954) (retirement benefits); Richfield Oil Corp. v. United States, 207 F.2d 864, 868, 871-872 (C.A. 9, 1953) (alternative holding) (Court of Claims remedy for claim in excess of $10,000 precludes jurisdiction based on Administrative Procedure Act); Aktiebolaget Bofors v. United States, 90 U.S.App.D.C. 92 , 194 F.2d 145, 150 (1951) (amount in contract suit exceeded $10,-000).
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
United States of America, Ex Rel. Stinson, Lyons, Gerlin & Bustamante, P.A. v. The Prudential Insurance Company
(4×)
See also United States v. Aster, 275 F.2d 281 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 364 U.S. 894 , 81 S.Ct. 223 , 5 L.Ed.2d 188 (1960).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
S. J. Groves & Sons Co. v. United States
See also Ove Gustavsson Contracting Co. v. Floete, 278 F.2d 912 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 364 U.S. 894 , 81 S.Ct. 225 , 5 L.Ed.2d 188 (1960).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Estate v. Blumenthal
See also Ove Gustavsson Contracting Co. v. Floete, 278 F.2d 912 (2d Cir.), Cert. denied, 364 U.S. 894 , 81 S.Ct. 225 , 5 L.Ed.2d 188 (1960) (complaint seeking declaration that contract with GSA was still in effect insufficient because Tucker Act provided adequate relief in Court of Claims).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Estate of Watson v. Blumenthal
See also Ove Gustavsson Contracting Co. v. Floete, 278 F.2d 912 (2d Cir.), cert, denied, 364 U.S. 894 , 81 S.Ct. 225 , 5 L.Ed.2d 188 (1960) (complaint seeking declaration that contract with GSA was still in effect insufficient because Tucker Act provided adequate relief in Court of Claims).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Rural Electrification Administration v. Northern States Power Company
See also Ove Gustavsson Con *693 tracting Company v. Floete, 2 Cir., 278 F.2d 912 , 914, cert. den. 364 U.S. 894 , 81 S.Ct. 225 , 5 L.Ed.2d 188 .” See Jaffe, The Right to Judicial Review II, 71 Harv.L.Rev. 769 at 790, “The Administrative Procedure Act has had a negligible effect on the basic right to judicial review. * * * ” See also Braude v. Wirtz, 9 Cir. 1965, 350 F.2d 702, at 707 , where the court pointed out, to support standing to sue under § 10 (a) of the Act it is not enough for appellants to show that they have been “adversely affected or aggrieved.” In addition, there must…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Duba v. Schuetzle
See also Ove Gustavsson Contracting Company v. Floete, 2 Cir., 278 F.2d 912 , 914, cert. den. 364 U.S. 894 , 81 S.Ct. 225 , 5 L.Ed.2d 188 . 26 In light of the teachings of the foregoing cases we are satisfied that plaintiffs have not shown that they have suffered a legal wrong because of the action of defendants, and have not been "adversely affected or aggrieved * * * within the meaning of any relevant statute." As the case is here posited, four of the plaintiffs are designated as farmers, one is the owner of the building formerly occupied by the county office in Mound City and three are desi…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Billy Maurice Ogden v. United States
(2×)
See also Borrow v. FCC, 109 U.S.App.D.C. 224 , 285 F.2d 666, 669-670 (1960), cert. denied 364 U.S. 892 , 81 S.Ct. 223 , 5 L.Ed.2d 188 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Duba v. Schuetzle
See also Ove Gustavsson Contracting Company v. Floete, 2 Cir., 278 F.2d 912 , 914, cert. den. 364 U.S. 894 , 81 S.Ct. 225 , 5 L.Ed.2d 188 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Borrow
v.
Federal Communications Commission
v.
Federal Communications Commission
No. 403.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 14, 1960.
Victor Rabino-wits and Leonard B. Boudin for petitioner. Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Bicks, Richard A. Solomon, John L. FitzGerald, Max D. Paglin and Ruth V. Reel for respondent.
Published
Citer courts: S.D. New York (1)
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Certiorari denied.