green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
4.4 score
“a request for a declaratory judgment upon a contract to which the government is a party is plainly a request for relief against the united states.”
Treatment trajectory · 1961 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1961
1993
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 16 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "but see"
Toilet Goods Association v. Gardner
But see Ove Gustavsson Contracting Co. v. Floete, 278 F.2d 912 (2 Cir.), cert. denied, 364 U.S. 894 , 81 S.Ct. 225 , 5 L.Ed.2d 188 (1960).
cited
Cited "but see"
Toilet Goods Ass'n v. Gardner
But see Ove Gustavsson Contracting Co. v. Floete, 278 F.2d 912 (2 Cir.), cert. denied, 364 U.S. 894 , 81 S.Ct. 225 , 5 L.Ed.2d 188 (1960).
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Serra v. United States General Services Administration
a request for a declaratory judgment upon a contract to which the government is a party is plainly a request for relief against the united states.
examined
Cited "see"
United States v. Carl L. Combs
(4×)
However, Scarlata merely held that a plea of guilty is not a "judgment of conviction" as that phrase is used in 18 U.S.C. § 659 , which provides: "A judgment of conviction or acquittal on the merits under the laws of any State shall be a bar to any prosecution under this section for the same act or acts." The court decided the issue on the basis of statutory interpretation, not double jeopardy analysis. 214 F.2d at 809 ; see Riadon v. United States, 274 F.2d 304, 305-06 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 364 U.S. 896 , 81 S.Ct. 225 , 5 L.Ed.2d 189 (1960).
cited
Cited "see"
In re Ampicillin Antitrust Litigation
See Rogers v. Societe Internationale, 107 U.S.App.D.C. 388 , 278 F.2d 268 , cert, denied, 364 U.S. 895 , 81 S.Ct. 223 , 5 L.Ed.2d 189 (1960).
discussed
Cited "see"
Tempo Trucking and Transfer Corp. v. Dickson
See Ove Gustavsson Contracting Co. v. Floete, 278 F.2d 912 (2d Cir. 1960), cert. denied, 364 U.S. 894 , 81 S.Ct. 225 , 5 L.Ed.2d 188 (1960) ; Cappadora v. Celebrezze, 356 F.2d 1 (2d Cir. 1966) ; Toilet Goods Assoc. v. Gardner, 360 F.2d 677 (2d Cir. 1966), aff'd, 387 U.S. 158 , 87 S.Ct. 1520 , 18 L.Ed. 2d 697 (1967) ; Citizenz Committee For Hudson Valley v. Volpe, 425 F.2d 97 (2d Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 949 , 91 S. Ct. 237 , 27 L.Ed.2d 256 (1970) ; Aquavella v. Richardson, supra; Mills v. Richardson, 464 F.2d 995 (2d Cir. 1972) ; Aguayo v. Richardson, 473 F.2d 1090 (2d Cir. 1973). 9 …
discussed
Cited "see"
Lawson v. Neil
(2×)
See Riadon v. United States, C.A.6th (1960), 274 F.2d 304, 306 [31, certiorari denied (1960), 364 U.S. 896 , 81 S.Ct. 225 , 5 L.Ed.2d 189 .
discussed
Cited "see"
John P. King v. The United States
See Ove Gustavsson Contracting Co. v. Floete, 278 F.2d 912 (C.A.2), cert. denied, 364 U.S. 894 , 81 S.Ct. 225 , 5 L.Ed.2d 188 (1960) (amount in contract suit exceeded $10,000); Powers v. United States, 218 F.2d 828 (C.A.7, 1954) (retirement benefits); Richfield Oil Corp. v. United States, 207 F.2d 864, 868, 871-872 (C.A. 9, 1953) (alternative holding) (Court of Claims remedy for claim in excess of $10,000 precludes jurisdiction based on Administrative Procedure Act); Aktiebolaget Bofors v. United States, 90 U.S.App.D.C. 92 , 194 F.2d 145, 150 (1951) (amount in contract suit exceeded $10,-000).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
S. J. Groves & Sons Co. v. United States
See also Ove Gustavsson Contracting Co. v. Floete, 278 F.2d 912 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 364 U.S. 894 , 81 S.Ct. 225 , 5 L.Ed.2d 188 (1960).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Estate v. Blumenthal
See also Ove Gustavsson Contracting Co. v. Floete, 278 F.2d 912 (2d Cir.), Cert. denied, 364 U.S. 894 , 81 S.Ct. 225 , 5 L.Ed.2d 188 (1960) (complaint seeking declaration that contract with GSA was still in effect insufficient because Tucker Act provided adequate relief in Court of Claims).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Estate of Watson v. Blumenthal
See also Ove Gustavsson Contracting Co. v. Floete, 278 F.2d 912 (2d Cir.), cert, denied, 364 U.S. 894 , 81 S.Ct. 225 , 5 L.Ed.2d 188 (1960) (complaint seeking declaration that contract with GSA was still in effect insufficient because Tucker Act provided adequate relief in Court of Claims).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Aetna Casualty and Surety Co. v. Sherwood Distilling Co.
See also United States v. Bond, 279 F.2d 837 (4 Cir., 1960), cert. den., 364 U.S. 895 , 81 S.Ct. 220 , 5 L.Ed.2d 189 (1960); United States v. Lebanon Woolen Mills Corp., 241 F.Supp. 393 (D.N.H., 1964), and cases cited therein.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Rural Electrification Administration v. Northern States Power Company
See also Ove Gustavsson Con *693 tracting Company v. Floete, 2 Cir., 278 F.2d 912 , 914, cert. den. 364 U.S. 894 , 81 S.Ct. 225 , 5 L.Ed.2d 188 .” See Jaffe, The Right to Judicial Review II, 71 Harv.L.Rev. 769 at 790, “The Administrative Procedure Act has had a negligible effect on the basic right to judicial review. * * * ” See also Braude v. Wirtz, 9 Cir. 1965, 350 F.2d 702, at 707 , where the court pointed out, to support standing to sue under § 10 (a) of the Act it is not enough for appellants to show that they have been “adversely affected or aggrieved.” In addition, there must…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Magnat Corporation v. B & B Electroplating Co., Inc., B & B Electroplating Co., Inc. v. Magnat Corporation
See, e. g., Arena v. Luekenbach Steamship Co., 1 Cir., 1960, 279 F.2d 186 , cert. den. 364 U.S. 895 , 81 S.Ct. 222 , 5 L.Ed.2d 189 ; New York Central R.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Duba v. Schuetzle
See also Ove Gustavsson Contracting Company v. Floete, 2 Cir., 278 F.2d 912 , 914, cert. den. 364 U.S. 894 , 81 S.Ct. 225 , 5 L.Ed.2d 188 . 26 In light of the teachings of the foregoing cases we are satisfied that plaintiffs have not shown that they have suffered a legal wrong because of the action of defendants, and have not been "adversely affected or aggrieved * * * within the meaning of any relevant statute." As the case is here posited, four of the plaintiffs are designated as farmers, one is the owner of the building formerly occupied by the county office in Mound City and three are desi…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Duba v. Schuetzle
See also Ove Gustavsson Contracting Company v. Floete, 2 Cir., 278 F.2d 912 , 914, cert. den. 364 U.S. 894 , 81 S.Ct. 225 , 5 L.Ed.2d 188 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
National Labor Relations Board
v.
Revere Metal Art Co., Inc.
v.
Revere Metal Art Co., Inc.
No. 412.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 14, 1960.
Solicitor General Rankin, Stuart Rothman, Dominick L. Manoli, Norton J. Come and Duane B. Beeson for petitioner.
Published
Citer courts: S.D. New York (1)
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.