green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
5.2 score
“. . . the essential element is ... the specific intent to monopolize....”
Treatment trajectory · 1961 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1961
1993
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 20 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Weiss v. York Hospital
. . . the essential element is ... the specific intent to monopolize....
discussed
Cited "see"
Town Sound & Custom Tops, Inc. v. Chrysler Motors Corp.
See, for example, Un ited States v. Jerrold Electronics Corp., 365 U.S. 567 , 81 S.Ct. 755 , 5 L.Ed.2d 806 (1961) (per curiam), aff’g 187 F.Supp. 545 (E.D.Pa.1961) (“per se” rule not applicable when rule of reason inquiry inexpensive and conduct that was necessary to establish a new industry was clearly reasonable while in effect).
discussed
Cited "see"
Town Sound And Custom Tops, Inc. v. Chrysler Motors Corporation
See, for example, United States v. Jerrold Electronics Corp., 365 U.S. 567 , 81 S.Ct. 755 , 5 L.Ed.2d 806 (1961) (per curiam), aff'g 187 F.Supp. 545 (E.D.Pa.1961) ("per se" rule not applicable when rule of reason inquiry inexpensive and conduct that was necessary to establish a new industry was clearly reasonable while in effect).
cited
Cited "see"
National Bancard Corporation (Nabanco), a Florida Corporation v. Visa U.S.A., Inc.
See United States v. Jerrold Electronics Corp., 187 F.Supp. 545, 556 (E.D.Pa.1960), aff'd mem., 365 U.S. 567 , 81 S.Ct. 755 , 5 L.Ed.2d 806 (1961).
cited
Cited "see"
Borough of Scottdale v. National Cable Television Corp.
See United States v. Jerrold Electronics Corp., 187 F.Supp. 545, 551-52 (E.D.Pa.1960), aff’d, 365 U.S. 567 , 81 S.Ct. 755 , 5 L.Ed.2d 806 (1961). .
cited
Cited "see"
Hudson Valley Asbestos Corporation v. Tougher Heating & Plumbing Co., Inc.
See United States v. Jerrold Electronics Corp., 187 F.Supp. 545, 554 (E.D.Pa.1960), aff’d per curiam, 365 U.S. 567 , 81 S.Ct. 755 , 5 L.Ed.2d 806 (1961).
discussed
Cited "see"
International Telephone and Telegraph Corporation v. General Telephone & Electronics Corporation and Hawaiian Telephone Company
See United States v. Jerrold Electronics Corp., 187 F.Supp. 545 (E.D.Pa.1960), aff'd per curiam, 365 U.S. 567 , 81 S.Ct. 755 , 5 L.Ed.2d 806 (1961) (While the government has not produced sufficient evidence of an actual violation to permit divestiture, an injunction against future acquisitions is proper.). 66 .
cited
Cited "see"
James Bulluck v. Walter Washington, Commissioner of the District of Columbia Jerome and Maura Freibaum v. Walter Washington, Commissioner of the District of Columbia
See Bush v. Orleans Parish School Bd., 187 F.Supp. 42 (E.D.La.1960), aff'd, 365 U.S. 569 , 81 S.Ct. 754 , 5 L.Ed.2d 806 (1961).
cited
Cited "see"
Bulluck v. Washington
See Bush v. Orleans Parish School Bd., 187 F.Supp. 42 (E.D.La.1960), aff’d, 365 U.S. 569 , 81 S.Ct. 754 , 5 L.Ed.2d 806 (1961).
discussed
Cited "see"
The Associated Press v. Taft-Ingalls Corporation, Formerly Known as the Cincinnati Times-Star Company
(2×)
See United States v. Jerrold Electronics Corp., 187 F.Supp. 545, 559, n. 25 (E.D.Pa.), aff’d, per curiam, 365 U. S. 567 , 81 S.Ct. 755 , 5 L.Ed.2d 806 , rehearing denied, 365 U.S. 890 , 81 S.Ct. 1026 , 6 L.Ed.2d 200 .
discussed
Cited "see"
McCain v. Davis
(2×)
See the Bush cases, especially Bush v. Orleans Parish School Board, E.D.La.1960, 188 F.Supp. 916 , aff'd 365 U.S. 569 , 81 S.Ct. 754 , 5 L.Ed.2d 806 . [5] Since the decision in Civil Rights Cases, 1883, 109 U.S. 3 , 3 S.Ct. 18 , 27 L.Ed. 835 , the principle has been established that the Fourteenth Amendment inhibits only such action as may fairly be said to be that of the States.
cited
Cited "see"
Vanadium Corp. of America v. Susquehanna Corporation
See, too, United States v. Jerrold Electronics Corp., D.C.E.D.Pa., 187 F.Supp. 545 , affd. 365 U.S. 567 , 81 S.Ct. 755 , 5 L.Ed.2d 806 . 74 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Little Caesar Enterprises, Inc. v. Smith
See, e.g., United States v. Jerrold Electronics Corp., 187 F.Supp. 545, 560 (E.D.Pa.1960), aff 'd, 365 U.S. 567 , 81 S.Ct. 755 , 5 L.Ed.2d 806 (1961)(per curiam).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Grappone, Inc. v. Subaru of New England, Inc.
See, e.g., United States v. Jerrold Electronics Corp., 187 F.Supp. 545 (E.D.Pa.1960) (“tie” between equipment and installation aided success of system and growth of industry), aff'd per curiam, 365 U.S. 567 , 81 S.Ct. 755 , 5 L.Ed.2d 806 (1961).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
R & G Affiliates, Inc. v. Knoll International, Inc.
See, e.g., United States v. Jerrold Electronics Corp., 187 F.Supp. 545, 559 (E.D.Penn.1960), aff’d per curiam, 365 U.S. 567 , 81 S.Ct. 755 , 5 L.Ed.2d 806 (1961). 50 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Mercedes-Benz of North America, Inc.
Compare United States v. Jerrold Electronics Corp., 187 F.Supp. 545 (E.D.Pa.1960), aff’d per curiam, 365 U.S. 567 , 81 S.Ct. 755 , 5 L.Ed.2d 806 (1961) (installation of cable antenna tv system is a separate market from components of the antenna system) with Times-Picayune Publishing Co. v. United States, 345 U.S. 594 , 73 S.Ct. 872 (1953) (advertising in separate morning and afternoon newspapers owned by single publisher is the same market).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Arthur H. Pitchford and Pitchford Scientific Instruments Corporation v. Pepi, Inc.
See also Anderson v. American Automotive Assoc., 454 F.2d 1240, 1244, 1246 (9th Cir. 1972). 26 . 425 F.2d 932 (3d Cir. 1970). 27 . 187 F.Supp. 545 (E.D.Pa.1960), att’d per curiam, 365 U.S. 567 , 81 S.Ct. 755 , 5 L.Ed.2d 806 (1961). 28 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Rex Chainbelt Inc., (Cross-Appellee) v. Harco Products, Inc., Dba Dfc Company, (Cross-Appellant)
See, e. g., United States v. Jerrold Electronics Corp., 187 F.Supp. 545 (E.D.Penn. 1960), aff’d 365 U.S. 567 , 81 S.Ct. 755 , 5 L.Ed.2d 806 (1961).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Ross R. Barnett and Paul B. Johnson, Jr
See also, Bush v. Orleans Parish School Bd., E.D.La.1960, 188 F.Supp. 916 , aff’d, 365 U.S. 569 , 81 S.Ct. 754 , 5 L.Ed.2d 806 (1961); Bush v. Orleans Parish School Bd., E.D.La.1960, 190 F.Supp. 861 , aff’d sub nom.; New Orleans v. Bush, 1961, 366 U.S. 212 , 81 S.Ct. 1091 , 6 L.Ed.2d 239 ; Bush v. Orleans Parish School Board, E.D.La.1961, 191 F.Supp. 871 , aff’d, 368 U.S. 11 , 82 S.Ct. 119 , 7 L.Ed.2d 75 (1961); Hall v. St.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bush v. Orleans Parish School Board
See also Bush v. Orleans Parish School Board, E.D.La., 188 F. Supp. 916, 929 , aff’d, 365 U.S. 569 , 81 S. Ct. 754 , 5 L.Ed.2d 806 . 21 . “ * * * (It) becomes necessary to restate the fundamental principles that govern this controversy.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
CITY OF KANSAS CITY, KANSAS
v.
UNITED STATES
v.
UNITED STATES
No. 657.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 20, 1961.
Joseph P. Jenkins for appellants., Solicitor General Cox and Roger P. Marquis for the United States et al.
Published
Citer courts: M.D. Pennsylvania (1)
Per Curiam.
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.