green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
4.2 score
“is the jury in each case to speculate, or hear testimony on the procreative proclivities and potentialities of the plaintiff and his spouse?”
Treatment trajectory · 1961 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1961
1993
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Ruff v. Weintraub
is the jury in each case to speculate, or hear testimony on the procreative proclivities and potentialities of the plaintiff and his spouse?
discussed
Cited "see"
Bayard W. Kennett, Administrator of the Estate of Linnell W. Kennett v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.
See McWeeney v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad, 282 F.2d 34 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 364 U.S. 870 , 81 S.Ct. 115 , 5 L.Ed.2d 93 (1960); compare Burlington North, Inc. v. Boxberger, 529 F.2d 284 (9th Cir. 1975) and Domeracki v. Humble Oil & Refining Co., 443 F.2d 1245 (3rd Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 883 , 92 S.Ct. 212 , 30 L.Ed.2d 165 (1971).
cited
Cited "see"
Allied Industrial Workers, Afl-Cio Local Union No. 289 v. National Labor Relations Board, Cavalier Division of Seeburg Corporation and Cavalier Corporation, Intervenor. National Labor Relations Board v. Cavalier Division of Seeburg Corporation and Cavalier Corporation, Cavalier Division of Seeburg Corporation and Cavalier Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board
See NLRB v. Wichita Television Corp., Inc., 277 F.2d 579, 585 (10th Cir. 1960), cert. denied, 364 U.S. 871 , 81 S.Ct. 113 , 5 L.
cited
Cited "see"
Allied Industrial Workers v. National Labor Relations Board
See NLRB v. Wichita Television Corp., Inc., 277 F.2d 579, 585 (10th Cir. 1960), cert. denied, 364 U.S. 871 , 81 S.Ct. 113 , 5 L.
cited
Cited "see"
United States Steel Corporation v. Lamp
See McWeeney v. New York, N.H. & H.R.R., 282 F.2d 34 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 364 U.S. 870 , 81 S.Ct. 115 , 5 L.Ed.2d 93 (1960); cf. Sleeman v. Chesapeake & Ohio R.R., 414 F.2d 305 (6th Cir. 1969).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Jack Cohen
See United States v. Guterma, 281 F.2d 742, 752-753 (2 Cir.), cert. denied, 364 U.S. 871 , 81 S.Ct. 114 , 5 L.Ed.2d 93 (1960).
discussed
Cited "see"
Petition of Marina Mercante Nicaraguense, SA
See McWeeney v. New York, N.H. & H.R.R., 282 F.2d 34, 41 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 364 U.S. 870 , 81 S.Ct. 115 , 5 L.Ed.2d 93 (1960) (dissenting opinion); Petition of Moore-McCormack Lines, Inc., 184 F.Supp. 585 , 593 n. 9 (S.D.N.Y.1960), modified on other grounds, 295 F.2d 583 (2d Cir. 1961), cert. denied, 368 U.S. 989 , 82 S.Ct. 606 , 7 L.Ed.2d 526 (1962). 39 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,827 Scientex Corporation v. Harry Kay
See, e.g., United States v. Guterma, 281 F.2d 742, 745 (2d Cir.) (defendant charged with willful violations of the requirements of section 16(a)), cert. denied, 364 U.S. 871 , 81 S.Ct. 114 , 5 L.Ed.2d 93 (1960).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Head Division, Amf, Inc., Petitioner v. National Labor Relations Board
See, e. g., N.L.R.B. v. Wichita Television Corp., 277 F.2d 579, 584 (10th Cir.), Cert. denied, 364 U.S. 871 , 81 S.Ct. 113 , 5 L.Ed.2d 93 (1960); N.L.R.B. v. West Coast Casket Co., 205 F.2d 902, 907 (9th Cir. 1953). 19 The Company argues that the record demonstrates conclusively that the strike in question would have occurred even had the unfair labor practices never taken place.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Head Division, AMF, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
See, e. g., N.L.R.B. v. Wichita Television Corp., 277 F.2d 579, 584 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 364 U.S. 871 , 81 S.Ct. 113 , 5 L.Ed.2d 93 (1960); N.L.R.B. v. West Coast Casket Co., 205 F.2d 902, 907 (9th Cir. 1953). .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Guterma
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 323.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 24, 1960.
Richard H. Weis for petitioner. Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Wilkey and Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States.
Published
Citer courts: Supreme Court of New Jersey (1)
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.