green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 5×
13.9 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 1977 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1977
2001
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 45 distinct citers.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Waste Management of Pennsylvania, Inc. v. Shinn
(2×)
summary judgment is notoriously inappropriate for de termination of claims in which issues of intent, good faith and other subjective feelings play dominant roles.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Copelands' Enterprises, Inc., Dba Copelands' Sports v. Cnv, Inc.
(2×)
summary judgment is inappropriate where issues of fact, intent good faith ... predominate
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Ronald Lee Gilliam v. Ronald Marshall
in all jury misconduct cases ... we have ... recognized that the granting of a mistrial is largely within the discretion of the trial judge
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Keys v. Lutheran Family & Children's Services
(2×)
the question of retaliation is particularly inappropriate for summary judgment disposition, since the primary issue is one of intent and motive
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
ca8 1981
(2×)
the question of retaliation is particularly inappropriate for summary judgment disposition, since the primary issue is one of intent and motive
discussed
Cited "see"
Alli v. United States
See Avco Delta Corp. Canada Ltd. v. United States, 540 F.2d 258, 263-64 (7th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1040 , 97 S.Ct. 739 , 50 L.Ed.2d 752 (1977); Ashley-Cooper Sales Seivs., Inc. v. Brentwood Mfg.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Taber Extrusions
See Pfizer, Inc. v. Int’l Rectifier Corp., 538 F.2d 180, 185 (8th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1040 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Taber Extrusions, Lp
(2×)
See Pfizer, Inc. v. Int’l Rectifier Corp., 588 F.2d 180, 185 (8th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1040 , 97 S.Ct. 738 , 50 L.Ed.2d 751 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
Montgomery v. CIR
See Avco Delta Corp. Canada Ltd. v. United States, 540 F.2d 258, 262 (7th Cir. -19- 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1040 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
Canteen Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board
See Spitzer Akron, Inc. v. NLRB, 540 F.2d 841, 846 (6th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1040 , 97 S.Ct. 739 , 50 L.Ed.2d 752 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Juvenile Male
See United States v. Kelly, 540 F.2d 990 (9th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1040 (1977) (finding that telephone records showing that a call was placed from one residence to another did not establish that the owners of the residences had a conversation, because other people could have answered the telephone).
discussed
Cited "see"
Michael L. Agee, D/B/A L & H Records v. Paramount Communications, Inc.
See United States v. Taxe, 380 F.Supp. 1010, 1014 (C.D.Cal.1974) (“The legislative history of the [Sound Recording Amendment of 1971] indicates that its intent was to put record ‘pirates’ out of business.”), aff'd, 540 F.2d 961 (9th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1040 , 97 S.Ct. 737 , 50 L.Ed.2d 751 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Agee v. Paramount Communications, Inc.
See United States v. Taxe, 380 P.Supp. 1010, 1014 (C.D.Cal.1974), aff'd, 540 F.2d 961 (9th Cir.1976), ce rt. denied, 429 U.S. 1040 , 97 S.Ct. 737 , 50 L.Ed.2d 751 (1977) (“The legislative history” of the 1971 Act indicates that its intent was to put record “pirates” out of business.) As stated in the House Report on the Sound Recording Act of 1971, Congress enacted the legislation to prevent “widespread unauthorized reproduction of phonograph records and tapes. 7 ” H.R.Rep.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Martinez-Moncivais
See id., citing McDonald v. Pless, 238 U.S. 264, 267 (1915); Hyde v. United States, 225 U.S. 347, 384 (1912).
cited
Cited "see"
Sequa Corp. v. Lititech, Inc.
See, A. v. District Court, 191 Colo. 10 , 550 P.2d 315, 323 (1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1040 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Andrew D. Hanrahan v. Charles E. Cole, Attorney General for the State of Alaska
See United States v. Wise, 550 F.2d 1180 , 1186 & n. 8 (9th Cir.) (citing United States v. Taxe, 540 F.2d 961, 965 (9th Cir.1976) (statutory language was not unconstitutionally vague when read in the context of the entire statute), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1040 (1977)), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 929 (1977). 5 When viewed in the context of the regulation's statutory scheme, it is evident that Alaska Admin.Code § 05.210 is not unconstitutionally vague because it provides ample notice of what type of permit is required for the commercial taking of salmon.
examined
Cited "see"
Northern Telecom, Inc. v. Datapoint Corporation, Defendant/cross-Appellant
(4×)
Accord Pfizer, Inc. v. International Rectifier Corp., 538 F.2d 180, 186 , 190 USPQ 273, 278 (8th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1040 , 97 S.Ct. 738 , 50 L.Ed.2d 751 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Hendleman
See, Avco Delta Corp. Canada Ltd. v. United States, 484 F.2d 692 (7th Cir.1973), cert. denied Canadian Parkhill Pipe Stringing Ltd. v. United States, 415 U.S. 931 , 94 S.Ct. 1444 , 39 L.Ed.2d 490 (1974), appeal after remand, 540 F.2d 258 (7th Cir.1976), cert. denied 429 U.S. 1040 , 97 S.Ct. 739 , 50 L.Ed.2d 752 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
Anastasato v. Commissioner
See Avco Delta Corp. v. United States, 540 F.2d 258 (7th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1040 , 97 S.Ct. 939 , 50 L.Ed.2d 752 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
Pano Anastasato v. Commissioner Of Internal Revenue
See Avco Delta Corp. v. United States, 540 F.2d 258 (7th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1040 , 97 S.Ct. 939 , 50 L.Ed.2d 752 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Kangaroos U.S.A., Inc. v. Caldor, Inc.
(2×)
See Pfizer, Inc. v. International Rectifier Corp., 538 F.2d 180, 185 , 190 USPQ 273, 277 (8th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1040 , 97 S.Ct. 738 , 50 L.Ed.2d 751 , 192 USPQ 543 (1977); Louis Schlesinger Co. v. Kresge Foundation, 388 F.2d 208 , 212 (3d Cir.1968), cert. denied, 391 U.S. 934 , 88 S.Ct. 1847 , 20 L.Ed.2d 854 (1968); 6-Pt. 2 J.
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Scott County Master Docket
(2×)
See Pfizer, Inc. v. International Rectifier Corp., 538 F.2d 180, 185 (8th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1040 , 97 S.Ct. 738 , 50 L.Ed.2d 751 (1977) (summary judgment is notoriously inappropriate when issue of intent is central).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Drum
See United States v. Taxe, 540 F.2d 961, 968 (9th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1040 , 97 S.Ct. 737 , 50 L.Ed.2d 751 (1977) (not prejudicial to refer to defendant tape pirate as “scavenger” and “parasite”).
discussed
Cited "see"
Medtronic, Inc. v. Catalyst Research Corp.
(2×)
See Pfizer, Inc. v. International Rectifier Corp., 538 F.2d 180, 186 (8th Cir. 1976), cert, denied, 429 U.S. 1040 , 97 S.Ct. 738 , 50 L.Ed.2d 751 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
Harry Fox Agency, Inc. v. Mills Music, Inc.
See United States v. Taxe, 540 F.2d 961 , 965 n.2 (9th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1040 , 97 S.Ct. 737 , 50 L.Ed.2d 751 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
People v. Small
See A v. District Court, 191 Colo. 10 , 550 P.2d 315 (1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1040 , 97 S.Ct. 737 , 50 L.Ed.2d 751 (1977) We disagree and find no constitutional basis for withholding production of the defense investigator's report.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Richard S. Berry
See U. S. v. Taxe, 540 F.2d 961 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1040 , 97 S.Ct. 737 , 50 L.Ed.2d 751 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Alfred Ponticelli, Civ. A. 77-3785
(2×)
See United States v. Kelly, 540 F.2d 990, 995 (9th Cir. 1976) (refusal to admit post-trial polygraphic evidence), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1040 , 97 S.Ct. 738 , 50 L.Ed.2d 751 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States of America and James L. Sherlock, Special Agent, Internal Revenue Service, in No. 79-2626 v. Warren R. Allshouse, in No. 79-2493
(2×)
Accord, e. g., United States v. Jones, 538 F.2d 225 (8th Cir. 1976) (per curiam), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1040 , 97 S.Ct. 738 , 50 L.Ed.2d 752 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
United States of America and Burnie W. Avrit, Internal Revenue Service Agent v. Gladys T. Lillibridge, Trustee
See United States v. Jones, 538 F.2d 225, 226 (8th Cir.1976), cert. den., 429 U.S. 1040 (1977), and cases cited therein.
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re William F. Poutre
(2×)
The govemment also must prove that the witness knew that his statements were false. 18 U.S.C. § 1623 ; see United States v. Kelly, 540 F.2d 990 (9th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1040 , 97 S.Ct. 738 , 50 L.Ed.2d 751 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
People v. Vesely
See A v. District Court, Colo., 550 P.2d 315 (1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1040 , 97 S.Ct. 737 , 50 L.Ed.2d 751 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Reinke Manufacturing Co. v. Sidney Manufacturing Corp.
(2×)
See Pfizer, Inc. v. Int’l Rectifier Corp., 538 F.2d 180, 185 (8th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1040 , 97 S.Ct. 738 , 50 L.Ed.2d 751 (1977), citing Precision Instrument Mfg.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Partnership Placements, Inc. v. Landmark Insurance
(2×)
See, e.g., Great Coastal Express, supra, 675 F.2d at 1357 ; Serzysko v. Chase Manhattan Bank, 461 F.2d 699, 702 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 883 , 93 S.Ct. 173 , 34 L.Ed.2d 139 (1972); see also Pfizer, Inc. v. International Rectifier Corp., 538 F.2d 180, 193-195 (8th Cir.1976) (discussing fraud on the court, but not in the context of Rule 60(b)), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1040 , 97 S.Ct. 738 , 50 L.Ed.2d 751 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
M.H. Segan Ltd. Partnership v. Hasbro, Inc.
See also, Eden Toys, 697 F.2d at 34 (citing United States v. Taxe, 540 F.2d 961 , 965 n. 2 (9th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1040 , 97 S.Ct. 737 , 50 L.Ed.2d 751 (1977) (quoting Nimmer on Copyright)).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Shearing v. Iolab Corp.
(2×)
See also Kangaroos U.S.A., Inc. v. Caldor, Inc., 778 F.2d 1571, 1575 (Fed.Cir. 1985), citing Pfizer, Inc. v. International Rectifier Corp., 538 F.2d 180, 185 (8th Cir.1976), ce rt. denied, 429 U.S. 1040 , 97 S.Ct. 738 , 50 L.Ed.2d 751 (1977) (summary judgment is inappropriate where issues of fact, intent, good faith and other subjective feelings predominate).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
People v. Corr
(2×)
Losavio v. Robb, 195 Colo. 533 , 579 P.2d 1152 (1978); see also A v. District Court, 191 Colo. 10 , 550 P.2d 315 (1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1040 , 97 S.Ct. 737 , 50 L.Ed.2d 751 (1977).
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
Ssih Equipment S.A. v. United States International Trade Commission and Stewart-Warner Corporation
(4×)
See, e.g., Pfizer, Inc. v. International Rectifier Corp., 538 F.2d 180, 195 , 190 USPQ 273, 286 (8th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1040 , 97 S.Ct. 738 , 50 L.Ed.2d 751 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Law Offices of Bernard D. Morley, P. C. v. MacFarlane
(2×)
See, e.g., A. v. District Court, 191 Colo. 10 , 550 P.2d 315 (1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1040 , 97 S.Ct. 737 , 50 L.Ed.2d 751 (1977); Losavio v. District Court, 188 Colo. 127 , 533 P.2d 32 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Richard E. Landau, Cross-Appellee v. J. D. Barter Construction Company, Inc., Cross
(2×)
See also Pfizer, Inc. v. International Rectifier Corp., 538 F.2d 180, 185 (8th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1040 , 97 S.Ct. 738 , 50 L.Ed.2d 751 (1977); Long v. Arkansas Foundry Company, 247 F.2d 366 , 369 (8th Cir. 1957); Johnson Foils, Inc. v. Huyck Corp., 61 F.R.D. 405, 407-08 (N.D.N.Y.1973).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
cadc 1980
See, e. g., Avco Delta Corp. Canada Ltd. v. United States, 540 F.2d 258 , 264 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1040 , 97 S.Ct. 739 , 50 L.Ed.2d 752 (1976); G.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Valley Finance, Inc. v. United States
See, e. g., Avco Delta Corp. Canada Ltd. v. United States, 540 F.2d 258 , 264 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1040 , 97 S.Ct. 739 , 50 L.Ed.2d 752 (1976); G.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. James Dell Potter
See, e. g., United States v. Taxe, 540 F.2d 961, 968 (9 Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1040 , 97 S.Ct. 737 , 50 L.Ed.2d 751 , reh. denied, 429 U.S. 1124 , 97 S.Ct. 1163 , 51 L.Ed.2d 575 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. David H. Moore
(2×)
See also, e. g., United States v. Kelly, 540 F.2d 990, 993 (9th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1040 , 97 S.Ct. 738 , 50 L.Ed.2d 751 (1977); United States v. Wesson, 478 F.2d 1180, 1181 (7th Cir. 1973); United States v. Gremillion, 464 F.2d 901, 905 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1085 , 93 S.Ct. 683 , 34 L.Ed.2d 672 (1972). 72 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Reese v. State
See, e.g., United States v. Khoury, 539 F.2d 441 (5th Cir. 1976), cert. denied 429 U.S. 1040 (1977); Parrott v. State of Arkansas, 497 F.2d 1123 (8th Cir. 1974); State v. Johnson, 396 P.2d 392 (Ariz. 1964); People v. Aguirre, 322 P.2d 478 (Cal.App. 1958); State v. Miles, 364 S.W.2d 532 , 9 ALR3d 1266 (Mo. 1963); State v. McFerran, 459 P.2d 148 (N.M.App. 1969); Hayes v. State, 397 P.2d 524 (Okla.Crim.App. 1964); State v. Roden, 339 P.2d 438 (Or. 1959); Annot., 9 ALR3d 1275 (1966). *425 Appellant’s conviction must be affirmed.
International Rectifier Corp.
v.
Pfizer, Inc.
v.
Pfizer, Inc.
No. 76-513.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 10, 1977.
429 U.S. 1040
Cited by 3 opinions | Published
C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.