red
Negative treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
9.0 score
“internal documents authored by agency staff or individual commissioners 'cannot be considered as an official agency expression of the will and intent of the commission”
Treatment trajectory · 1977 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1977
2001
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 32 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Kickapoo Oil Co. v. Murphy Oil Corp.
internal documents authored by agency staff or individual commissioners 'cannot be considered as an official agency expression of the will and intent of the commission
discussed
Cited "see"
De Archibold v. United States
(2×)
See Russell Corp. v. United States, 210 Ct.Cl. 596 , 537 F.2d 474, 482 (1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1073 , 97 S.Ct. 811 , 50 L.Ed.2d 791 (1977) (“Implied-in-fact contracts differ from contracts implied in law (quasi-contracts), where a duty is imposed by operation of law without regard to the intent of the parties ____This court, of course has no jurisdiction to render judgment against the United States based upon a contract implied in law.”).
discussed
Cited "see"
State Ex Rel. Heitkamp v. Quill Corp.
(2×)
See Matter of Heftel Broadcasting Honolulu, Inc., 57 Hawaii 175 , 554 P.2d 242 (1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1073 , 97 S.Ct. 811 , 50 L.Ed.2d 791 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Claverie v. LSU Medical Center
See, United States v. Coplen, 541 F.2d 211 (9th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1073 , 97 S.Ct. 810 , 50 L.Ed.2d. 791 (1977) (officer's conduct of looking into an airplane with a flashlight was not a "search"); State v. Moses, 367 So.2d 800 (La.1979) (officers deliberately listening to conversation of the defendant in an adjoining room, without the aid of electronic listening devices, did not constitute a search).
discussed
Cited "see"
City of El Centro v. United States
(2×)
See Russell Corp. v. United States, 210 Ct.Cl. 596, 609 , 537 F.2d 474, 482 (1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1073 , 97 S.Ct. 811 , 50 L.Ed.2d 791 (1977).
examined
Cited "see"
Green v. Brantley
(4×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Bankers Life and Casualty Company v. Callaway, 530 F.2d 625, 634-35 (5th Cir.), reh'g denied, 536 F.2d 1387 (5th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1073 , 97 S.Ct. 811 , 50 L.Ed.2d 791 (1977) (inapplicability of § 558(c) to failure to renew license). 4 . 5 U.S.C. § 558 (c) (1977) provides in part as follows: ...
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Harold Lloyd Phillips
See United States v. Wright, 542 F.2d 975, 982-83 (7th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1073 , 97 S.Ct. 810 , 50 L.Ed.2d 790 (1977); see also United States v. Hollinger, 553 F.2d 535, 542-43 (7th Cir.1977) (approving the practice disapproved in Dunn ); 2 C.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Ronald Donaldson
See United States v. Kutas, 542 F.2d 527, 528 (9th Cir.1976) (affirming conviction for harboring and concealing escaped prisoner, 18 U.S.C. § 1072 , cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1073 (1977); United States v. Biami, 243 F.Supp. 917, 918 (E.D.Wis. 1965) (refusal to admit officers so as to prevent discovery of subject of arrest warrant was an act of harboring or concealing)- Steagald merely holds that an arrest warrant for a fugitive does not, absent other validating circumstances, justify a warrantless search of a third party’s home.
discussed
Cited "see"
White v. Franklin
(2×)
See Bankers Life & Casualty Co. v. Callaway, 530 F.2d 625, 634-35 (5th Cir.), reh'g denied, 536 F.2d 1387 (5th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1073 , 97 S.Ct. 811 , 50 L.Ed.2d 791 (1977) (inapplicability of section 558(c) to failure to renew license), cf. Taxay, M.D. v. United States, 345 F.Supp. 1284, 1285-86 (D.D.C.1972), aff’d, 487 F.2d 1214 (D.C.Cir.1973) (discretion of Administrator to renew or fail to renew certification). 3 . 5 U.S.C. § 558 (c) (1977) provides in part as follows: Except in cases of willfulness or those in which public health, interest, or safety requires otherwise,…
examined
Cited "see"
State v. Jennette
(4×)
Accord, United States v. Coplen, 541 F.2d 211, 215 (9th Cir.1976, cert. denied 429 U.S. 1073 , 97 S.Ct. 810 , 50 L.Ed.2d 791 (1977) (warrant or exigent circumstances required for seizure of parked aircraft after officer looked in window and spotted marijuana debris).
cited
Cited "see"
Collins v. State
See United States v. Wright, (7th Cir.1976) 542 F.2d 975, 989 , cert. denied 429 U.S. 1073 , 97 S.Ct. 810 , 50 L.Ed.2d 790 ; Golliher v. United States, (8th Cir.1966) 362 F.2d 594, 604 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Airborne Data, Inc. v. The United States
(2×)
See Russell Corp. v. United States, 210 Ct.Cl. 596, 609 , 537 F.2d 474, 482 (1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1073 , 97 S.Ct. 811 , 50 L.Ed.2d 791 (1977); The Padbloc Co. v. United States, supra. Defendant failed to live up to its obligation, and is accordingly liable to plaintiff for damages resulting from the defendant’s disclosure and use.
discussed
Cited "see"
Black Construction Corp. v. Agsalud
See 32A Words and Phrases 140-153 and In re Heftel Broadcasting Honolulu, 57 Haw. 175 , 180 n.4, 554 P.2d 242 , 246 n.4 (1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1073 (1977). 17 Moreover, “[w]hen aid to construction of the meaning of words, as used in the statute is available, there certainly can be no ‘rule of law’ which forbids its use, however clear the words may *284 appear on ‘superficial examination.’ ” United States v. American Trucking Associations, 310 U.S. 534, 543-44 (1940) (footnotes omitted); Train v. Colorado Public Interest Research Group, 426 U.S. 1, 10 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
Norton v. State
See United States v. Wright, (7th Cir. 1976) 542 F.2d 975 , cert. denied, (1977) 429 U.S. 1073 , 97 S.Ct. 810 , 50 L.Ed.2d 790 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. John E. Scales
See United States v. Wright, 542 F.2d 975, 978-979 (7th Cir. 1976), cert. denied 429 U.S. 1073 , 97 S.Ct. 810 , 50 L.Ed.2d 790 (1977). 2 The trial judge’s action in this case did not contain any suggestion of bias against the appellant.
cited
Cited "see"
Kellerblock
See Russell Corp. v. United States, 210 Ct.Cl. 596 , 537 F.2d 474 (1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1073 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. John Corbin
See United States v. Wright, 542 F.2d 975, 988 (7th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1073 , 97 S.Ct. 810 , 50 L.Ed.2d 790 (1977); United States v. Newson, 531 F.2d 979, 983 (10th Cir. 1976); United States v. Garner, 529 F.2d 962, 970 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 922 , 96 S.Ct. 2630 , 49 L.Ed.2d 376 , 429 U.S. 850 , 97 S.Ct. 138 , 50 L.Ed.2d 124 (1976); United States v. Scheper, 520 F.2d 1355, 1357-58 (4th Cir. 1975).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Victor Vargas-Martinez, United States of America v. Jose Arroyo-Ayala
See, United States v. Kutas, 542 F.2d 527 (9th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1073 , 97 S.Ct. 810 , 50 L.Ed.2d 790 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Raymond Eaglin
See United States v. Kutas, 542 F.2d 527, 529-30 (9th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1073 , 97 S.Ct. 810 , 50 L.Ed.2d 790 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Orville S. Clavey
(2×)
See United States v. Wright, 542 F.2d 975, 983-85 (7th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1073 , 97 S.Ct. 810 , 50 L.Ed.2d 790 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
ca9 1977
(2×)
See, United States v. Coplen, 541 F.2d 211, 215 (9th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1073 , 97 S.Ct. 810 , 50 L.Ed.2d 791 (1977), and United States v. Young, 535 F.2d 484, 487-88 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 999 , 97 S.Ct. 525 , 50 L.Ed.2d 609 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Curtis
(2×)
See, United States v. Coplen, 541 F.2d 211, 215 (9th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1073 , 97 S.Ct. 810 , 50 L.Ed.2d 791 (1977), and United States v. Young, 535 F.2d 484, 487-88 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 999 , 97 S.Ct. 525 , 50 L.Ed.2d 609 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Jones v. United States
(2×)
See also Russell Corp. v. United States, 210 Ct.Cl. 596 , 537 F.2d 474, 480 (1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1073 , 97 S.Ct. 811 , 50 L.Ed.2d 791 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Melrose Associates, L.P. v. United States
(2×)
Bank v. United States, 205 Ct.Cl. 741, 750-51 , 508 F.2d 817, 822 (1974)); see also City of El Centro v. United States, 922 F.2d at 820 (citing Russell Corp. v. United States, 210 Ct.Cl. 596, 609 , 537 F.2d 474, 482 (1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1073 , 97 S.Ct. 811 , 50 L.Ed.2d 791 (1977); Fincke v. United States, 230 Ct.Cl. at 244 , 675 F.2d at 295 ); Fincke v. United States, 230 Ct.Cl. at 244 , 675 F.2d at 295 (citing Baltimore and Ohio R.R.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Buesing v. United States
(2×)
Bank v. United States, 205 Ct.Cl. 741, 750-51 , 508 F.2d 817, 822 (1974)); see also City of El Centro v. United States, 922 F.2d at 820 (citing Russell Corp. v. United States, 210 Ct.Cl. 596, 609 , 537 F.2d 474, 482 (1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1073 , 97 S.Ct. 811 , 50 L.Ed.2d 791 (1977); Fincke v. United States, 230 Ct.Cl. at 244 , 675 F.2d at 295 ); Fincke v. United States, 230 Ct.Cl. at 244 , 675 F.2d at 295 (citing Baltimore and Ohio R.R.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bailey v. United States
(2×)
Bank v. United States, 205 Ct.Cl. 741, 750-51 , 508 F.2d 817, 822 (1974)); see also City of El Centro v. United States, 922 F.2d at 820 (citing Russell Corp. v. United States, 210 Ct.Cl. 596, 609 , 537 F.2d 474, 482 (1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1073 , 97 S.Ct. 811 , 50 L.Ed.2d 791 (1977); Fincke v. United States, 230 Ct.Cl. at 244 , 675 F.2d at 295 ); Fincke v. United States, 230 Ct.Cl. at 244 , 675 F.2d at 295 (citing Baltimore and Ohio R.R.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
McCauley v. States
(2×)
Bank v. United States, 205 Ct.Cl. 741 , 508 F.2d 817, 822 (1974)); see also City of El Centro v. United States, 922 F.2d at 820 (citing Russell Corp. v. United States, 210 Ct.Cl. 596 , 537 F.2d 474, 482 (1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1073 , 97 S.Ct. 811 , 50 L.Ed.2d 791 (1977); Fincke v. United States, 675 F.2d at 295 ); Fincke v. United States, 675 F.2d at 295 (citing Baltimore and Ohio R.R.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Solomon Monk, Also Known as David L. Martin v. Colonel Gordon N. Zelez, Commandant
See Chapman, 386 U.S. at 24 , 87 S.Ct. at 828 ; Holland, 348 U.S. at 140 , 75 S.Ct. at 137 ; see also United States v. Wright, 542 F.2d 975, 988 (7th Cir.1976) (any court including substantial doubt language in its reasonable doubt instruction “can reasonably expect a reversal”), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1073 , 97 S.Ct. 810 , 50 L.Ed.2d 790 (1977); United States v. Alvero, 470 F.2d 981, 983 (5th Cir.1972) (reversing conviction in which reasonable doubt was defined in terms of a “very substantial doubt”); Smith, 718 F.2d at 1277 (determining that “ameliorating instructions ... served to…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Sperry Corp. v. United States
(2×)
See Pacific Maritime Ass’n v. United States, 123 Ct.Cl. 667 , 675, 108 F.Supp. 603 , 607 (1952); see also Johnson Controls, 8 Cl.Ct. at 368 . 2 The evidence generally required to support an implied-in-fact contract was described by the Court of Claims in Russell Corp. v. United States, 210 Ct.Cl. 596, 608-09 , 537 F.2d 474, 481-82 (1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1073 , 97 S.Ct. 811 , 50 L.Ed.2d 791 (1977): A contract implied in fact requires a showing of the same mutual intent to contract as that required for an express contract.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Sterling-Kates v. United States
(2×)
See, e.g., Russell Corp. v. United States, 210 Ct.Cl. 596 , 537 F.2d 474 (1976), cert. denied 429 U.S. 1073 , 97 S.Ct. 811 , 50 L.Ed.2d 791 (1977); Saul Bass & Assoc. v. United States, 205 Ct.Cl. 214 , 505 F.2d 1386 (1974); see also Prevado Village v. United States, 3 Cl.Ct. 219 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Eugene Leslie
See, e.g., United States v. Kutas, 542 F.2d 527, 528 (9th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1073 , 97 S.Ct. 810 , 50 L.Ed.2d 790 (1977); United States v. Smith, 550 F.2d 277, 281-82 (5th Cir.), cert. denied sub nom.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Michele Portmann, Doing Business as Grafica, an Individual v. United States
(2×)
See, e.g., Russell Corp. v. United States, 537 F.2d 474, 484 (Ct.Cl.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1073 , 97 S.Ct. 811 , 50 L.Ed.2d 791 (1977) (doctrine of equitable estoppel will be applied, in appropriate case, to prevent United States from denying existence of a contractual agreement); Roberts v. United States, 357 F.2d 938, 946-47 (Ct.Cl.1966) (“When the Government is acting in its proprietary capacity, it may be estopped by an act of waiver in the same manner as a private contractor.”); United States v. Coast Wineries, 131 F.2d 643, 650 (9th Cir. 1942) (inability of judicial participan…
Coplen
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 76-586.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 25, 1977.
Cited by 122 opinions | Published
Citer courts: Temporary Emergency Court of A… (1)
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.