Frankel v. Am. Exp.-Isbrandtsen Lines, Inc., 430 U.S. 986 (1977). · Go Syfert
Search
Frankel v. Am. Exp.-Isbrandtsen Lines, Inc., 430 U.S. 986 (1977). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
95 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 29 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Coral Petroleum, Inc. v. Paribas (In Re Coral Petroleum, Inc.) (txsb, 1985-06-17)
Treatment trajectory · 1977 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1977 2001 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 16 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Coral Petroleum, Inc. v. Paribas (In Re Coral Petroleum, Inc.)
Bankr. S.D. Tex. · 1985 · signal: see · confidence high
See In re Miller, 545 F.2d 916, 919 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 987 , 97 S.Ct. 1687 , 52 L.Ed.2d 382 (1977) (A letter sent to the owner of an art gallery, the bailee of the paintings and sculptures which were the collateral, adequately served to notify the owner of the gallery of the secured party’s interest in the collateral).
discussed Cited "see" Hasset v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield (In Re O.P.M. Leasing Services, Inc.)
Bankr. S.D.N.Y. · 1985 · signal: see · confidence high
See In re Miller, 545 F.2d 916, 918 (5th Cir.), cert. denied sub nom Nuss v. Looney, 430 U.S. 987 , 97 S.Ct. 1687 , 52 L.Ed.2d 382 (1977); Transport Equipment Co. v. Guaranty State Bank, , 518 F.2d 377, 380 (10th Cir.1975); Shelton v. Erwin, 472 F.2d 1118, 1120 (8th Cir.1973); Bruce Lincoln-Mercury Inc. v. Universal C.I.T.
cited Cited "see" State of Arizona v. Lacey
Ariz. Ct. App. · 1984 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Greenawalt, 128 Ariz. 150 , 624 P.2d 828 (1981) and State v. Watson, 114 Ariz. 1 , 559 P.2d 121 (1976), cert. denied 430 U.S. 986 , 97 S.Ct. 1687 , 52 L.Ed.2d 382 (1977).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Zaehringer
Iowa · 1982 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Watson, 114 Ariz. 1, 5-6 , 559 P.2d 121, 126 (1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 986 , 97 S.Ct. 1687 , 52 L.Ed.2d 382 (1977); State v. Smith, 58 Ohio St.2d 344, 348 , 12 Ohio Op.3d 313 , 316-17, 390 N.E.2d 778, 781 (1979) (per curiam), vacated, 448 U.S. 902 , 100 S.Ct. 3041 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1132 (1980); see Valenzuela v. Griffin, 654 F.2d 707, 709-10 (10th Cir.1981) (per curiam); State v. Dreiling, 601 S.W.2d 660, 661-62 (Mo.Ct.App.1980); Allison v. State, 562 P.2d 883, 885 (Okla.Crim.App.1977).
cited Cited "see" Fruehauf Corp. v. Sherman (In Re Gringeri Bros. Transportation Co.)
Bankr. D. Mass. · 1981 · signal: see · confidence high
See, In re Miller, 545 F.2d 916 (5th Cir.), rehearing denied 548 F.2d 335 , cert. denied 430 U.S. 987 , 97 S.Ct. 1687 , 52 L.Ed.2d 382 (1977).
cited Cited "see" State v. Watson
Ariz. · 1981 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Watson, 114 Ariz. 1 , 559 P.2d 121 (1976), cert. denied 430 U.S. 986 , 97 S.Ct. 1687 , 52 L.Ed.2d 382 (1977) (Watson I).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Edwards (2×)
Ariz. · 1979 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Watson, 114 Ariz. 1, 6 , 559 P.2d 121, 126 (1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 986 , 97 S.Ct. 1687 , 52 L.Ed.2d 382 (1977); Sigard v. State, 537 S.W.2d 736, 739 (Tex.Cr.App.1976).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Lambright v. Lewis
D. Ariz. · 1996 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See e.g., Arizona v. Watson, 114 Ariz. 1 , 559 P.2d 121 (1976) (resolving on direct appeal those submitted ineffective assistance of counsel claims that did not raise matters outside the record and directing the trial court to consider submitted colorable claims raising matters outside the record), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 986 , 97 S.Ct. 1687 , 52 L.Ed.2d 382 (1977); Arizona v. Zuck, 134 Ariz. 509, 515 , 658 P.2d 162, 168 (1982) (en banc) (noting that “[i]n the past, when the issue of competency of trial counsel has been raised, we have always resolved the matter with whatever was before us in…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Jose Orlando Lopez, United States of America v. Jose Orlando Lopez (2×)
9th Cir. · 1993 · signal: see also · confidence low
Id. at 440; see also People v. Manson, 61 Cal. App.3d 102 , 132 Cal.Rptr. 265, 301 (1976) (holding prosecutor to ethical rules because he “is no less a member of the State Bar than any other admitted lawyer”), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 986 , 97 S.Ct. 1686 , 52 L.Ed.2d 382 (1977); see also Triple A Mach.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Jose Orlando Lopez, (Two Cases) (2×)
9th Cir. · 1993 · signal: see also · confidence low
Id. at 440; see also People v. Manson, 61 Cal.App.3d 102 , 132 Cal.Rptr. 265, 301 (1976) (holding prosecutor to ethical rules because he “is no less a member of the State Bar than any other admitted lawyer”), ce rt. denied, 430 U.S. 986 , 97 S.Ct. 1686 , 52 L.Ed.2d 382 (1977); see also Triple A Mach.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Joe Hunt v. National Broadcasting Company, Inc. Itc Productions, Inc.
9th Cir. · 1989 · signal: see also · confidence low
See id.; see also People v. Manson, 61 Cal.App.3d 102, 189-90 , 132 Cal.Rptr. 265 (1976) (Los Angeles County, with 7 million inhabitants in 1970, was a populous, heterogeneous metropolitan area capable of supplying satisfactory jury panel for prosecution of Charles Manson for highly publicized crimes), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 986 , 97 S.Ct. 1686 , 52 L.Ed.2d 382 , (1977).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Freeman
N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. · 1988 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also People v. Manson, 132 Cal. Rptr. 265, 335-336 , 61 Cal. App. 3d 102, 216 (1976) cert. den. 430 U.S. 986 , 97 S.Ct. 1686 , 52 L.Ed. 2d 382 (1977) (holding that "statements attributed to trial jurors by others are no more than hearsay or double hearsay and are thus incompetent and insufficient to either impeach a jury verdict or to compel a court to conduct a post-verdict voir dire of the jury.") Moreover, in the instant case, it is not so much a hearsay statement of a juror that is being offered for its truth, but rather an incompetent opinion of a non-juror, Mrs. Ebert, accompanied by…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Sarf v. Leff (In Re Candy Lane Corp.)
Bankr. S.D.N.Y. · 1984 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Looney v. Nuss (In re Miller), 545 F.2d 916, 918 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 987 , 97 S.Ct. 1687 , 52 L.Ed.2d 382 (1977); cf. Lyon v. Ty-Wood Corp., 212 Pa.Super. 69, 72 , 239 A.2d 819, 820-21 (1968) (court “must examine the business activities, the objectives and the relationship of the parties to ascertain [their] intent and on that basis determine whether *577 the transactions in question legally constitute an absolute assignment or a security interest”).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Southern Rock, Inc. And Key Constructors, Inc., a Joint Venture v. B & B Auto Supply, Sand Pit and Trucking Co., Inc., Reliance Insurance Co. v. United States
5th Cir. · 1983 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also In the Matter of Miller, 545 F.2d 916, 918 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 987 , 97 S.Ct. 1687 , 52 L.Ed.2d 382 (1977) (applying Texas law).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Southern Rock, Inc. v. B & B Auto Supply
5th Cir. · 1983 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also In the Matter of Miller, 545 F.2d 916, 918 (5th Cir.), cert, denied, 430 U.S. 987 , 97 S.Ct. 1687 , 52 L.Ed.2d 382 (1977) (applying Texas law).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Smith (2×)
Ariz. · 1979 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also State v. Watson, 114 Ariz. 1 , 559 P.2d 121 (1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 986 , 97 S.Ct. 1687 , 52 L.Ed.2d 382 (1977).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Frankel
v.
American Export-Isbrandtsen Lines, Inc.
No. 76-6358.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 25, 1977.
430 U.S. 986
Published

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.