green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 3×
12.2 score
G Cite
cited 6× by 2 distinct cases ·
“Mailgram”
Treatment trajectory · 1977 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1977
2001
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 50 distinct citers.
discussed
Distinguished
Sidwell v. Express Container Services
As the Fifth Circuit explained in Alabama Dry Dock & Shipbuilding Co. v. Kininess, 554 F.2d 176, 178 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 903 , 98 S.Ct. 299 , 54 L.Ed.2d 190 (1977) (distinguished in Texports ): [The back lot upon which a crane was located by which claimant was injured was somewhere] from 150 to 2,000 feet from the water's edge.
discussed
Distinguished
Sidwell v. Express Container Services, Inc.
As the Fifth Circuit explained in Alabama Dry Dock & Shipbuilding Co. v. Kininess, 554 F.2d 176, 178 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 903 , 98 S.Ct. 299 , 54 L.Ed.2d 190 (1977) (distinguished in Texports): [The back lot upon which a crane was located by which claimant was injured was somewhere] from 150 to 2,000 feet from the water’s edge.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Colonial Acquisition Partnership v. Colonial at Lynnfield, Inc.
substance rather than form determines the scope of identity of parties
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
ITT World Communications, Inc. v. Western Union Telegraph Co.
mailgram
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
RCA Global Communications, Inc. v. Western Union Telegraph Co.
mailgram
discussed
Cited "see"
Denson v. United States
(2×)
Montoya de Hernández, 473 U.S. at 541-42 , 105 S.Ct. at 3310-11 (allowing detention of traveler based on reasonable suspicion of smuggling contraband in her alimentary canal); United States v. Pino, 729 F.2d 1357, 1359 (11th Cir.1984) (finding use of x-ray to search traveler constitutional where reasonable suspicion exists that person is concealing drugs internally); see United States v. Himmelwright, 551 F.2d 991, 994 (5th Cir.) cert. denied, 434 U.S. 902 , 98 S.Ct. 298 , 54 L.Ed.2d 189 (1977) [62] (permitting strip search of border entrant based upon reasonable suspicion).
discussed
Cited "see"
Stichting Ter Behartiging Van De Belangen Van Oudaandeelhouders In Het Kapitaal Van Saybolt International B.V. v. Phillippe S.E. Schreiber
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Expert Elec., Inc. v. Levine, 554 F.2d 1227 , 1233 (2d Cir.) ("The threshold requirement of identity of parties, qualified by the doctrine of privity, finds its roots in the ancient notion, now supplemented by the due process clause, that a person cannot be bound by a judgment without notice of a claim and an opportunity to be heard."), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 903 , 98 S.Ct. 300 , 54 L.Ed.2d 190 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Stichting Ter Behartiging Van de Belangen Van Oudaandeelhouders in Het Kapitaal Van Saybolt International B.V. v. Schreiber
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Expert Elec., Inc. v. Levine, 554 F.2d 1227 , 1233 (2d Cir.) (“The threshold requirement of identity of parties, qualified by the doctrine of privity, finds its roots in the ancient notion, now supplemented by the due process clause, that a person cannot be bound by a judgment without notice of a claim and an opportunity to be heard.”), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 903 , 98 S.Ct. 300 , 54 L.Ed.2d 190 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
Singh v. Parnes
See Saud v. Bank of New York, 929 F.2d 916, 919 (2d Cir.1991) (quoting Expert Elec. v. Levine, 554 F.2d 1227 , 1234 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 903 , 98 S.Ct. 300 , 54 L.Ed.2d 190 (1977)).
cited
Cited "see"
Alfadda v. Fenn
See Expert Elec., Inc. v. Levine, 554 F.2d 1227 , 1233 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 903 , 98 S.Ct. 300 , 54 L.Ed.2d 190 (1977). 17 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Tourangeau v. Uniroyal, Inc.
See Expert Elec., Inc. v. Levine, 554 F.2d 1227 , 1233 (2d Cir.) (“Generally speaMng, one whose interests were adequately represented by another vested with the authority of representation is bound by. the judgment, although not formally a party to the litigation.”), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 903 , 98 S.Ct. 300 , 54 L.Ed.2d 190 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Tourangeau v. Uniroyal
See Expert Elec., Inc. v. Levine, 554 F.2d 1227 , 1233 (2d Cir.) ("Generally speaking, one whose interests were adequately represented by another vested with the authority of representation is bound by the judgment, although not formally a party to the litigation."), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 903 , 98 S.Ct. 300 , 54 L.Ed.2d 190 (1977). 40 UGTC argues that the cases cited above are of questionable continued validity in light of more recent Supreme Court decisions, specifically Richards v. Jefferson County, --- U.S. ----, 116 S.Ct. 1761 , 135 L.Ed.2d 76 (1996), Martin v. Wilks, 490 U.S. 755 , 109 S…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Shepard
See United States v. Himmelwright, 406 F.Supp. 889, 893 (S.D.Fla.1975), aff'd 551 F.2d 991 (5th Cir.) cert. denied, 434 U.S. 902 , 98 S.Ct. 298 , 54 L.Ed.2d 189 (1977) (custom agent directing a passenger to remove an object from inside her person— without any physical contact — constituted a search of the person).
cited
Cited "see"
Northwest Independent Forest Manufacturers v. Department of Labor & Industries
See Expert Elec., Inc. v. Levine, 554 F.2d 1227 , 1235-36, cert. denied, 434 U.S. 903 , 54 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A. v. Celotex Corporation and U.S. Mineral Products Company, Dana Corporation
See Expert Elec., Inc. v. Levine, 554 F.2d 1227 , 1233 (2d Cir.) (“Generally speaking, one whose interests were adequately represented by another vested with the authority of representation is bound by the judgment, although not formally a party to the litigation.”), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 903 , 98 S.Ct. 300 , 54 L.Ed.2d 190 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
McNeil v. National Football League
See Expert Elec., Inc. v. Levine, 554 F.2d 1227 , 1233 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 903 , 98 S.Ct. 300 , 54 L.Ed.2d 190 (1977); Aluminum Co. v. Admiral Merchants Motor Freight, Inc., 486 F.2d 717, 721 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1113 , 94 S.Ct. 843 , 38 L.Ed.2d 739 (1973). 27 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Michael B. Mitchell Clarence M. Mitchell, III
(2×)
See United States v. Partin, 552 F.2d 621 , 642 n. 26 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 903 , 98 S.Ct. 298 , 54 L.Ed.2d 189 (1977) (bribery not prerequisite to violation of § 1503); Reeves , 752 at 998-1000 (filing of improper tax liens violates 26 U.S.C. § 7212 ); Browning, 572 F.2d at 725 (no need for threat of violence to violate § 1505).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. The Bonanno Organized Crime Family Of La Cosa Nostra
See Reinisch v. New York Stock Exchange, 52 F.R.D. 561 (S.D.N.Y.1971). 53 The absence of a cognizable legal existence separate from its members would also appear to render useless a judgment against an association like the Bonanno Family since "proof of either knowledge of or ratification of an association's wrongful acts is crucial to extension of additional personal liability to its members." Expert Elec., Inc. v. Levine, 554 F.2d 1227 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 903 , 98 S.Ct. 300 , 54 L.Ed.2d 190 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
Ruiz v. Commissioner of the Department of Transportation
See Expert Electric, Inc. v. Levine, 554 F.2d 1227, 1233 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 903 , 98 S.Ct. 300 , 54 L.Ed.2d 190 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
Ruiz v. Commissioner of Department of Transportation of City of New York
See Expert Electric, Inc. v. Levine, 554 F.2d 1227, 1233 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 903 , 98 S.Ct. 300 , 54 L.Ed.2d 190 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Rr Village Association, Inc., Jay Stanleigh and Authur L. Penzel, Plaintiffs v. Denver Sewer Corporation and Town of Roxbury (New York)
(2×)
See Expert Electric, Inc. v. Levine, 554 F.2d 1227, 1235-36 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 903 , 98 S.Ct. 300 , 54 L.Ed.2d 190 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. William J. Cintolo
(2×)
See United States v. Partin, 552 F.2d 621, 642 n. 26 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 903 , 98 S.Ct. 298 , 54 L.Ed.2d 189 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Isaac James Tindle, A/K/A I.J.
(2×)
See United States v. Partin, 552 F.2d 621, 632 (5th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 903 , 98 S.Ct. 298 , 54 L.Ed.2d 189 (1977) (“[A] witness may not claim the privilege out of fear that he will be prosecuted for perjury for what he is about to say, although he may claim the privilege if his new testimony might suggest that he had perjured himself in testifying on the same subject at a prior proceeding.”).
cited
Cited "see"
Multi-State Communications, Inc. v. United States
See Expert Electric, Inc. v. Levine, 554 F.2d 1227, 1233 (2d Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 903 , 98 S.Ct. 300 , 54 L.Ed.2d 190 (1977). 2.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Bishop
See State v. Trudo, 253 N.W.2d 101, 106 (Iowa), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 903 , 98 S.Ct. 299 , 54 L.Ed.2d 189 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
WILLIAMS v. Mercer
(2×)
See United States v. Partin, 552 F.2d 621 , 630 n. 9 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 903 , 98 S.Ct. 298 , 54 L.Ed.2d 189 (1977); 8 Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 17.01[1], at 17-4; ¶ 17.10-.ll (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Certain Complaints Under Investigation by an Investigating Committee of Judicial Council of Eleventh Circuit. v. Mercer
(2×)
See United States v. Partin, 552 F.2d 621 , 630 n. 9 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 903 , 98 S.Ct. 298 , 54 L.Ed.2d 189 (1977); 8 Moore's Federal Practice p 17.01, at 17-4; p 17.10-.11 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Conway v. Village of Mount Kisco
See Expert Electric, Inc. v. Levine, 554 F.2d 1227, 1232-33 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 903 , 98 S.Ct. 300 , 54 L.Ed.2d 190 (1977); Kaplan v. Bennett, 465 F.Supp. 555, 559 (S.D.N.Y.1979).
cited
Cited "see"
Conway v. Village of Mount Kisco, New York
See Expert Electric, Inc. v. Levine, 554 F.2d 1227, 1232-33 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 903 , 98 S.Ct. 300 , 54 L.Ed.2d 190 (1977); Kaplan v. Bennett, 465 F.Supp. 555, 559 (S.D.N.Y.1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Mason
(2×)
The question is factual and one of substance not form.” Church of Scientology v. Linberg, 529 F.Supp. 945 (C.D.Calif.1981) (emphasis added); see Expert Electric, Inc. v. Levine, 554 F.2d 1227 (2d Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 903 , 98 S.Ct. 300 , 54 L.Ed.2d 190 (1977); People v. Tynan (Colo.App.
discussed
Cited "see"
cadc 1984
See Expert Electric, Inc. v. Levine, 554 F.2d 1227, 1233-36 (2d Cir.) (judgment against trade association held binding on members), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 903 , 98 S.Ct. 300 , 54 L.Ed.2d 190 (1977); Aluminum Co. of America v. Admiral Merchants Motor Freight, Inc., 486 F.2d 717, 720-21 (7th Cir.) (trade association members precluded from litigating claim previously decided against association), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1113 , 94 S.Ct. 843 , 38 L.Ed.2d 739 (1973).
discussed
Cited "see"
Western Coal Traffic League v. Interstate Commerce Commission
See Expert Electric, Inc. v. Levine, 554 F.2d 1227, 1233-36 (2d Cir.) (judgment against trade association held binding on members), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 903 , 98 S.Ct. 300 , 54 L.Ed.2d 190 (1977); Aluminum Co. of America v. Admiral Merchants Motor Freight, Inc., 486 F.2d 717, 720-21 (7th Cir.) (trade association members precluded from litigating claim previously decided against association), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1113 , 94 S.Ct. 843 , 38 L.Ed.2d 739 (1973).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Charles H. Schaffner
(2×)
See United States v. Partin, 552 F.2d 621, 631 (5th Cir.), cert, denied, 434 U.S. 903 , 98 S.Ct. 298 , 54 L.Ed.2d 189 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Esau Jackson, United States of America v. Clarence Gene Scroggins, United States of America v. William Franklin Dancy
(2×)
Accord United States v. Marionneaux, 514 F.2d 1244, 1248 (5th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 903 , 98 S.Ct. 298 , 54 L.Ed.2d 189 (1977). 4 Accordingly, the par *586 ticipants in separate, but jointly tried conspiracies should at least be afforded the protection of explicit limiting instructions.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Curtis George Lockett
See also United States v. Gramlich, 551 F.2d 1359 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 866 , 98 S.Ct. 201 , 54 L.Ed.2d 141 (1977); United States v. Charest, supra; see United States v. Himmelwright, 551 F.2d 991 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 902 , 98 S.Ct. 298 , 54 L.Ed.2d 189 (1977); United States v. Cobb, 432 F.2d 716 (4th Cir. 1970); c.f.
discussed
Cited "see"
Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Federal Communications Commission
See Western Union International, Inc. v. FCC, 544 F.2d 87 (2d Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 903 , 98 S.Ct. 299 , 54 L.Ed.2d 189 (1977); ITT World Communications Inc. v. FCC, 621 F.2d 1201, 1202 (2d Cir. 1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Western Union Telegraph Company v. Federal Communications Commission
See Western Union International, Inc. v. FCC, 544 F.2d 87 (2d Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 903 , 98 S.Ct. 299 , 54 L.Ed.2d 189 (1977); ITT World Communications Inc. v. FCC, 621 F.2d 1201, 1202 (2d Cir. 1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Coburn
(2×)
See State v. Trudo, 253 N.W.2d 101, 107-08 (Iowa 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 903 , 98 S.Ct. 299 , 54 L.Ed.2d 189 .
examined
Cited "see"
United States v. James Wood Castleberry, United States of America v. Charles Monroe Gilpen
(4×)
See United States v. Partin, 552 F.2d 621 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 903 , 98 S.Ct. 298 , 54 L.Ed.2d 189 (1977); United States v. Librach, 536 F.2d 1228 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 939 , 97 S.Ct. 354 , 50 L.Ed.2d 308 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
Hayes v. New England Millwork Distributors, Inc.
See Expert Electric, Inc. v. Levine, 554 F.2d 1227 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 903 , 98 S.Ct. 300 , 54 L.Ed.2d 190 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Belieu
See State v. Trudo, 253 N.W.2d 101, 107 (Iowa), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 903 , 98 S.Ct. 299 , 54 L.Ed.2d 189 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Smith
See State v. Trudo, 253 N.W.2d 101, 107 (Iowa), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 903 , 98 S.Ct. 299 , 54 L.Ed.2d 189 (1977); State v. Shea, 218 N.W.2d 610, 615 (Iowa 1974).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Hicks
See State v. Trudo, 253 N.W.2d 101, 107 (Iowa), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 903 , 98 S.Ct. 299 , 54 L.Ed.2d 189 (1977); State ex rel.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Hubbard
(2×)
See United States v. Partin, 552 F.2d 621 , 630-31 (5th Cir.) cert. denied, 434 U.S. 903 , 98 S.Ct. 298 , 54 L.Ed.2d 189 (1977); United States v. Cohn, 452 F.2d 881, 883-84 (2d Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 975 , 92 S.Ct. 1196 , 31 L.Ed.2d 249 (1972).
cited
Cited "see"
ca9 1979
See Expert Electric, Inc. v. Levine, 554 F.2d 1227 (2d Cir.) Cert. denied, 434 U.S. 903 , 98 S.Ct. 300 , 54 L.Ed.2d 190 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
Abramson v. University of Hawaii
See Expert Electric, Inc. v. Levine, 554 F.2d 1227 (2d Cir.) cert. denied, 434 U.S. 903 , 98 S.Ct. 300 , 54 L.Ed.2d 190 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Carol Asbury and John Bruce
See United States v. Himmelwright, 551 F.2d 991, 996 (5th Cir.), cert, denied, 434 U.S. 902 , 98 S.Ct. 298 , 54 L.Ed.2d 189 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Vernon Earl Walden
(2×)
See United States v. Partin, 552 F.2d 621, 628 (5th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 903 , 98 S.Ct. 298 , 54 L.Ed.2d 189 (1977); United States v. Brasseux, 509 F.2d 157 (5th Cir. 1975).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Herbert A. Howard and Elmer Gary Ritter
See United States v. Partin, 552 F.2d 621, 630-31 (5th Cir.), cert. denied,-U.S. -, 98 S.Ct. 298 , 54 L.Ed.2d 189 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
iOptimize Realty Inc. v. Cox Enterprises, Inc.
Org., Inc., 198 F.3d 85, 88 (2d Cir. 1999)). “[A] claim ‘could have been raised’ in an earlier action for res judicata purposes if the two actions involve the same ‘nucleus of operative fact.’” Akhenaten 544 F. Supp. 2d at 330 (citing Waldman v. Vill. of Kiryas Joel, 207 F.3d 105 , 108 (2d Cir. 2000)); see also Saud v. Bank of New York, 929 F.2d 916, 919 (2d Cir. 1991) (“[I]t is the facts surrounding the transaction or occurrence which operate to constitute the cause of action.” (citation modified) (quoting Expert Elec., Inc. v. Levine, 554 F.2d 1227 , 1234 (2d Cir. 1977), cert…
Gamble
v.
Estelle, Corrections Director
v.
Estelle, Corrections Director
No. 76-6941.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 17, 1977.
Published
Citer courts: S.D. New York (3)
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.