green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 3×
9.3 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1982 ·
…since the only relief requested was the recovery of money, equitable relief will not lie.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1978 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1978
2002
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 32 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Peatross v. Global Associates
LEXIS 15229, 17 (D.Or.1992) (same); but see McDaniel v. University of Chicago, 548 F.2d 689 (7th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1033 , 98 S.Ct. 765 , 54 L.Ed.2d 780 (1978) (finding that implying a private right of action in Act is necessary to effectuáte the intention of Congress in passing the statute; however, the Seventh Circuit in Simpson v. Reynolds Metals Co., Inc., 629 F.2d 1226 , 1240 n. 27 (7th Cir.1980) noted that the McDaniel decision had been rendered without the guidance of the subsequent pronouncements on the issue by the Supreme Court); Norling v. Valley Contracting and Pre-…
discussed
Cited "but see"
Dorey Electric Co. v. Pittman Mechanical Contractors, Inc.
Glynn v. Capeletti Bros., 621 F.2d 1309 (5th Cir.1980); Weber v. Heat Control Co., 579 F.Supp. 346 (D.N.J.1982), aff'd, 728 F.2d 599 (3rd Cir.1984); but see McDaniel v. University of Chicago, 548 F.2d 689 (7th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1033 , 98 S.Ct. 765 , 54 L.Ed.2d 780 (1978); Norling v. Valley Contracting & Pre-Mix, 773 F.Supp. 186 (D.N.D.1991).
discussed
Cited "but see"
Bane v. Radio Corp. of America
But see McDaniel v. University of Chicago, 548 F.2d 689 (7th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1033 (1978). 3 We agree with Capeletti and we therefore follow its holding that there is no implied right of private action under the Davis-Bacon Act.
discussed
Cited "but see"
Clinton C. Simpson v. Reynolds Metals Company, Inc.
But see McDaniel v. University of Chicago, 548 F.2d 689, 692-93 (7th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1033 , 98 S.Ct. 765 , 54 L.Ed.2d 780 (1978), in which, without the guidance of the Supreme Court’s pronouncements in Cannon v. University of Chicago, we found plaintiff-laborers were the “especial” beneficiaries of § 1 of the Davis-Bacon Act, 40 U.S.C. § 276a. (“The advertised specifications for every contract in excess of $2,000, to which the United States ... is a party, for construction of public buildings . shall contain a provision stating the minimum wages to be paid various …
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Peterson, Howell & Heather, Inc.
collateral estoppel doctrine does not apply when different sovereigns and, thus, different parties are involved in the litigation
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. General Motors Corporation. (Two Cases)
pitman arms
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Leftwich v. Leftwich
(2×)
since the only relief requested was the recovery of money, equitable relief will not lie.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Stanley E. Coutu v. Universities Research Association, Inc.
(2×)
also: Cited "see"
“Neither the statute nor the regulations promulgated thereunder provide any administrative remedy in favor of an employee who has been injured by the failure to include the prevailing-wage provisions in a contract.” (Solicitor General’s amicus curiae brief opposing the petition for a writ of certiorari in University of Chicago and Argonne v. McDaniel, 434 U.S. 1033, at 25, n.20 , 98 S.Ct. 765 .) Instead, the regulations are either inadequate as to this class or are merely detailed guidelines for determining what constitutes Davis-Bacon work. 12 While such regulations presumably facilitat…
cited
Cited "see"
Guardiola v. State
See United States v. Dionisio, 410 U.S. 1 , 98 S.Ct. 764 , 85 L.Ed.2d 67 (1973).
cited
Cited "see"
Lewis v. Glickman
See Saffron v. Department of Navy, 561 F.2d 938, 946 (D.C.Cir.1977) (McGowan, J., concurring), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1033 , 98 S.Ct. 765 , 54 L.Ed.2d 780 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
Hoffman v. State
See Turley v. Wyrick, 554 F.2d 840, 842 (8th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1033 , 98 S.Ct. 765 , 54 L.Ed.2d 780 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Edmondson
(2×)
See Turley v. Wyrick, 554 F.2d 840 (8th Cir.1977) (state and federal robbery charges), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1033 , 98 S.Ct. 765 , 54 L.Ed.2d 780 (1978); cf. Heath v. Alabama, 474 U.S. 82 , 106 S.Ct. 433 , 88 L.Ed.2d 387 (1984) (under dual-sovereignty doctrine, two states can punish defendant for same offense without violating Double Jeopardy Clause).
discussed
Cited "see"
Stanley LAVERY, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. John O. MARSH, Jr., Defendant, Appellee
See generally Saffron v. Department of the Navy, 561 F.2d 938, 941, 944-945 (D.C.Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1033 , 98 S.Ct. 765 , 54 L.Ed.2d 780 (1978) (discussing origin of section 2401(a) in the Tucker Act, conferring concurrent jurisdiction in the district courts and Court of Claims).
cited
Cited "see"
Fariss v. State
See Turley v. Wyrick, 554 F.2d 840 (8th Cir. 1977), cert. denied 434 U.S. 1033 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
Calvin Geyen, Jr. v. John O. Marsh, Jr., Secretary of the United States Army
See Saffron v. Department of the Navy, 561 F.2d 938, 946 (D.C.Cir.1977) (McGowan, J., concurring), ce rt. denied, 434 U.S. 1033 , 98 S.Ct. 765 , 54 L.Ed.2d 780 (1978); Werner, 188 F.2d at 268 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Impro Products, Inc. v. John R. Block, Secretary of Agriculture of the United States
See Saffron v. Department of Navy, 561 F.2d 938, 946 (D.C.Cir.1977) (McGowan, J concurring), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1033 , 98 S.Ct. 765 , 54 L.Ed.2d 780 (1978); Werner v. United States, 188 F.2d 266, 268 (9th Cir.1951); cf. Screven v. United States, 207 F.2d 740, 741 (5th Cir.1953); Heritage Pullman Bank & Trust Co. v. United States, 480 F.Supp. 54, 57 (N.D.
discussed
Cited "see"
Nichols v. Hughes
See Saffron v. Department of the Navy, 561 F.2d 938, 941-46 (D.C.Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1033 , 98 S.Ct. 765 , 54 L.Ed.2d 780 (1978); Werner v. United States, 188 F.2d 266, 268 (9th Cir.1951) (Sec. 2401(a) applies to equitable claims against the government).
discussed
Cited "see"
Nichols v. Hughes
See Saffron v. Department of the Navy, 561 F.2d 938, 941-46 (D.C.Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1033 , 98 S.Ct. 765 , 54 L.Ed.2d 780 (1978); Werner v. United States, 188 F.2d 266, 268 (9th Cir.1951) (§ 2401(a) applies to equitable claims against the government).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Lawrence E. Palmer
See Turley v. Wyrick, 554 F.2d 840 (8th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1033 , 98 S.Ct. 765 , 54 L.Ed.2d 780 (1978); United States v. Culotta, 413 F.2d 1343, 1345 (2d Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 1019 , 90 S.Ct. 568 , 24 L.Ed.2d 510 (1970).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Michael Issac Lasky, United States of America v. Darleen Elford, United States of America v. Timothy A. Lantz
See Turley v. Wyrick, 554 F.2d 840, 842 (8th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1033 , 98 S.Ct. 765 , 54 L.Ed.2d 780 (1978); United States v. Barket, 530 F.2d 181, 188 (8th Cir. 1976).
cited
Cited "see"
Carlin
See Saffron v. Department of the Navy, 561 F.2d 938 (1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1033 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
Baylor University Medical Center v. National Labor Relations Board
See NLRB v. Beth Israel Hospital, 554 F.2d 477, 482 (1st Cir. 1977), cert. granted,-U.S. -, 98 S.Ct. 764 , 54 L.Ed.2d 780 (1978). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Sun Engineering Enterprises, Inc.
See also, McDaniel v. University of Chicago, 548 F.2d 689, 695 (7th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1033 , 98 S.Ct. 765 , 54 L.Ed.2d 780 (1978) ("an action for breach of an employment contract is traditionally a state court action”); Faerber Electric Co. v. Atlanta Tri-Com, Inc., 795 F.Supp. 240, 243 (N.D.Ill.1992) (referring to F.D.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Norling v. Valley Contracting and Pre-Mix
Compare McDaniel v. University of Chicago, 548 F.2d 689 (7th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1033 , 98 S.Ct. 765 , 54 L.Ed.2d 780 (1978) (recognizing implied private cause of action) with United States ex rel.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Chicago Rigging Co. v. Uniroyal Chemical Co., Inc.
Universities Research Ass’n, Inc. v. Coutu, 450 U.S. 754 , 777 n. 28, 101 S.Ct. 1451 , 14 n. 28, 67 L.Ed.2d 662 (1981); see, e.g., McDaniel v. University of Chicago, 512 F.2d 583 , 585 n. 1 (7th Cir.), judgment vacated on other grounds, 423 U.S. 810 , 96 S.Ct. 20 , 46 L.Ed.2d 30 (1975), on remand, 548 F.2d 689 (7th Cir.1977) (implying private right of action in Davis-Bacon Act), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1033 , 98 S.Ct. 765 , 54 L.Ed.2d 780 (1978); Gallaher & Speck, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co., 226 F.2d 728, 731 (7th Cir.1955); Harry F. Ortlip Co. v. Alvey Ferguson Co., 223 F.Supp. 893, 894-95 (E.D.…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Peninsula Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n. v. Federal Savings & Loan Insurance
See also Harr v. Prudential Federal Savings & Loan Ass’n., 557 F.2d 751 (10th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1033 , 98 S.Ct. 766 , 54 L.Ed.2d 780 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States Ex Rel. Motta v. Able Bituminous Contractors, Inc.
Compare Capelletti Bros., supra, and Weber v. Heat Control Co., 728 F.2d 599 (3d Cir.1984) with McDaniel v. University of Chicago, 548 F.2d 689 (7th Cir.1977), cert. denied 434 U.S. 1033 , 98 S.Ct. 765 , 54 L.Ed.2d 780 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Local Division 732, Amalgamated Transit Union v. Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority
(2×)
Compare also United States v. Capeletti Bros., Inc., 621 F.2d 1309 (5th Cir. 1980) (no implied private right of action under Davis-Bacon Act) with McDaniel v. University of Chicago, 548 F.2d 689 (7th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1033 , 98 S.Ct. 765 , 54 L.Ed.2d 780 (1978) (implied right of action exists under Davis-Bacon Act).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Michael Alan Crooker v. United States
See also Turley v. Wyrick, 554 F.2d 840, 842 (8th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1033 , 98 S.Ct. 765 , 54 L.Ed.2d 780 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
People v. Morillo
(2×)
See also Turley v Wyrick, 554 F2d 840 (CA 8, 1977), cert den 434 US 1033 ; 98 S Ct 765 ; 54 L Ed 2d 780 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Local Div. No. 714, Amalgamated Transit Union v. Greater Portland Transit District of Portland
See also McDaniel v. University of Chicago, 548 F.2d 689, 694 (7th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1033 , 98 S.Ct. 765 , 54 L.Ed.2d 780 (1978); City of Inglewood v. City of Los Angeles, 451 F.2d 948, 954-56 (9th Cir. 1972); Bossier Parish School Board v. Lemon, 370 F.2d 847 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 388 U.S. 911 , 87 S.Ct. 2116 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1350 (1967).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
National Labor Relations Board v. Western Clinical Laboratory, Inc.
Compare Lutheran Hospital of Milwaukee, Inc. v. NLRB, 564 F.2d 208 (7th Cir. 1977) (Board’s union solicitation rules for hospitals upheld), and NLRB v. Beth Israel Hos *462 pital, 554 F.2d 477 (1st Cir. 1977) (same), cert. granted, -- U.S. --, 98 S.Ct. 764 , 54 L.Ed.2d 780 (1978); with St.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Beth Israel Hospital
v.
National Labor Relations Board
v.
National Labor Relations Board
No. 77-152.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 16, 1978.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari granted.