green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
8.5 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 1982 ·
…if a customer is fully able to evaluate his broker's advice and agrees with the broker's suggestions, the customer retains control of the account
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1978 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1978
2002
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 42 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Heille v. City of St. Paul
But see Tiger Trash v. Browning Ferris Industries, Inc., 560 F.2d 818, 826 (7th Cir. 1977) cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1034 , 98 S.Ct. 768 , 54 L.Ed.2d 782 (1978) (appearing to shift at least the burden of persuasion noting that plaintiff has adequately charged and defendants have not persuaded as (sic) that a significant or appreciable segment of interstate commerce was not involved ....”) .
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,767 Merrill M. Follansbee v. Davis, Skaggs & Co., Inc., a Delaware Corporation, and Chester T. Bjerke, Jr., Merrill M. Follansbee v. Davis, Skaggs & Co., Inc., a Delaware Corporation, and Chester T. Bjerke, Jr.
if a customer is fully able to evaluate his broker's advice and agrees with the broker's suggestions, the customer retains control of the account
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Follansbee v. Davis, Skaggs & Co.
if a customer is fully able to evaluate his broker's advice and agrees with the broker's suggestions, the customer retains control of the account
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Williams v. Gerstenfeld
See, e.g., Lynch v. Meridian Hill Studio Apts., Inc., 491 A.2d 515, 521 (D.C.1985) (citing Milton Properties, Inc. v. Newby, 456 A.2d 349, 354 (D.C.1983)); Bennett v. Kiggins, 377 A.2d 57, 59-60 (D.C.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1034 , 98 S.Ct. 768 , 54 L.Ed.2d 782 *1177 (1978) (particularly in cases in which a party is alleging fraud, a party must allege all facts which will enable the court to draw an inference of fraud and “allegations in the form of conclusions on the part of the pleader as to the existence of fraud are insufficient,” for purposes of Rule 12-I(k) and 56(e)); Dillard v…
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Gordon A. Heille, Individually and D/B/A Trashmasters v. The City of St. Paul, Minnesota, a Municipal Corporation
Id. at 821.
cited
Cited "see"
Jane W. v. President & Directors of Georgetown College
See Bennett v. Riggins, 377 A.2d 57, 59 (D.C.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1034 , 98 S.Ct. 768 , 54 L.Ed.2d 782 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
Ferenc v. World Child, Inc.
See Bennett v. Kiggins 377 A.2d 57, 59 (D.C.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1034 , 98 S.Ct. 768 , 54 L.Ed.2d 782 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
Esteves v. Esteves
See Hercules & Co., Ltd. v. Shama Restaurant Corp., 613 A.2d 916, 923 (D.C.1992) (citing Bennett v. Kiggins, 377 A.2d 57, 59 (D.C.1977), ce rt. denied, 434 U.S. 1034 , 98 S.Ct. 768 , 54 L.Ed.2d 782 (1978)).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Thomson McKinnon Securities, Inc.
See, Newburger, Loeb & Co., Inc. v. Gross, 563 F.2d 1057 , 1069-70 (2d Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1035 , 98 S.Ct. 769 , 54 L.Ed.2d 782 (1978); Shad v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc., 799 F.2d 525, 529 (9th Cir. 1986); M & B Contracting Corp. v. Dale, 795 F.2d 531, 533 (6th Cir.1986); Arceneaux v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., 767 F.2d 1498, 1501 (11th Cir.1985). *983 1.
discussed
Cited "see"
Harry J. Diduck v. Kaszycki & Sons Contractors, Inc.
See Newberger, Loeb & Co., Inc. v. Gross, 563 F.2d 1057 , 1074 (2d Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1035 , 98 S.Ct. 769 , 54 L.Ed.2d 782 (1978); Brock v. Gerace, 635 F.Supp. 563, 567 (D.N.J.1986) (act or omission which furthers or completes the breach).
discussed
Cited "see"
Diduck v. Kaszycki & Sons Contractors, Inc.
See Newberger, Loeb & Co., Inc. v. Gross, 563 F.2d 1057 , 1074 (2d Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1035 , 98 S.Ct. 769 , 54 L.Ed.2d 782 (1978); Brock v. Gerace, 635 F.Supp. 563, 567 (D.N.J.1986) (act or omission which furthers or completes the breach).
discussed
Cited "see"
Digital Equipment Corp. v. Currie Enterprises
DISCUSSION “It is not inherently unconstitutional ... to proceed with parallel civil and criminal proceedings.” Mainelli v. United States, 611 F.Supp. 606, 615 (D.C.R.I.1985) (citing United States v. Kordel, 397 U.S. 1 , 90 S.Ct. 763 , 25 L.Ed.2d 1 (1970) 6 ); accord Arthurs v. Stem, 560 F.2d 477, 479-80 (1st Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1034 , 98 S.Ct. 768 , 54 L.Ed.2d 782 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
Litton Industries, Inc. v. Lehman Bros. Kuhn Loeb
See Newburger, Loeb & Co. v. Gross, 563 F.2d 1057, 1078 (2d Cir.1977), cert. denied, , 434 U.S. 1035 , 98 S.Ct. 769 , 54 L.Ed.2d 782 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
Norniella v. Kidder Peabody & Co., Inc.
See Newburger, Loeb & Co., Inc. v. Gross, 563 F.2d 1057, 1069 (2d Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1035 , 98 S.Ct. 769 , 54 L.Ed.2d 782 (1978).
examined
Cited "see"
Associated Dry Goods Corporation v. Towers Financial Corporation
(4×)
See Newburger, Loeb & Co. v. Gross, 563 F.2d 1057, 1070 (2d Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1035 , 98 S.Ct. 769 , 54 L.Ed.2d 782 (1978); United Artists Corp. v. Masterpiece Prods.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Parcels of Land, Etc., Appeal of Lionel Laliberte
See Arthurs v. Stern, 560 F.2d 477, 479-80 (1st Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1034 , 98 S.Ct. 768 , 54 L.Ed.2d 782 (1978); Flint v. Mullen, 499 F.2d 100,105 (1st Cir.) (“The Constitution, however, does not require the state, in every case, to adopt what appear to be preferable procedures.”), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1026 , 95 S.Ct. 505 , 42 L.Ed.2d 301 (1974); see also United States v. Rylander, 460 U.S. at 758-59 , 103 S.Ct. at 1553 (“ ‘That the defendant faces such a dilemma demanding a choice between complete silence and presenting a defense has never been thought an invasion of t…
discussed
Cited "see"
Dymm v. Cahill
See Newburger, Loeb & Co., Inc. v. Gross, 563 F.2d 1057, 1078 (2d Cir.1977, cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1035 , 98 S.Ct. 769 , 54 L.Ed.2d 782 (1978); Ayerslee Corp., N. V. v. Overlook Sponsor Corp., 618 F.Supp. 1398, 1403 (S.D.N.Y.1985), aff 'd mem., 800 F.2d 1127 (2d Cir.1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Horton
See Arthurs v. Stern, 560 F.2d 477, 478-79 (1st Cir.1977) (there is nothing “inherently repugnant to due process in requiring the doctor to choose between giving testimony at the disciplinary hearing, a course that may help the criminal prosecutors, and keeping silent, a course that may lead to the loss of his license”), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1034 , 98 S.Ct. 768 , 54 L.Ed.2d 782 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
Zola v. Gordon
See Newburger, Loeb & Co. v. Gross, 563 F.2d 1057, 1078 (2d Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1035 , 98 S.Ct. 769 , 54 L.Ed.2d 782 (1978); Ayerslee Corp. v. Overlook Sponsor Corp., 618 F.Supp. 1398, 1403 (S.D.N.Y.1985), aff'd mem., 800 F.2d 1127 (2d Cir.1986); Riviera Congress Assocs. v. Yassky, 18 N.Y.2d 540, 547 , 223 N.E.2d 876, 879 , 277 N.Y.S.2d 386, 392 (1966).
discussed
Cited "see"
Gaddis v. Orgulf Transport Co.
See Marvin v. Central Gulf Lines, Inc., 554 F.2d 1295 (5th Cir.1977), reh. denied, 559 F.2d 29 , cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1035 , 98 S.Ct. 769 , 54 L.Ed.2d 782 (1978); Kent v. Shell Oil Co., 286 F.2d 746 (5th Cir.1961); Carlton v. M/G Transport Services, Inc., 698 F.2d 846 (6th Cir.1983).
cited
Cited "see"
Gruber v. Prudential-Bache Securities, Inc.
See Newburger, Loeb & Co., Inc. v. Gross, 563 F.2d 1057 , 1069 (2d Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1035 , 98 S.Ct. 769 , 54 L.Ed.2d 782 (1978); Jaksich, 582 F.Supp. at 495-96 . 20 .
cited
Cited "see"
Favaloro v. S/S GOLDEN GATE
See Arthurs v. Stern, 560 F.2d 477, 479-80 (1st Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1034 , 98 S.Ct. 768 , 54 L.Ed.2d 782 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Kobrin Securities, Inc.
See Arthurs v. Stern, 560 F. 2d 477, 479 (1st Cir.1977), cert. den. 434 U.S. 1034 , 98 S.Ct. 768 , 54 L.Ed.2d 782 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
Peiffer v. Lebanon School District
See Arthurs v. Stern, 560 F.2d 477 (1st Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1034 , 98 S.Ct. 768 , 54 L.Ed.2d 782 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
Murphy v. Gutfreund
See Newburger, Loeb & Co., Inc. v. Gross, 563 F.2d 1057, 1078 (2d Cir.1977), cert, denied, 434 U.S. 1035 , 98 S.Ct. 769 , 54 L.Ed.2d 782 (1978). 60 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Jaksich v. Thomson McKinnon Securities, Inc.
See Newburger, Loeb & Co., Inc. v. Gross, *496 563 F.2d 1057, 1069 (2d Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1035 , 98 S.Ct. 769 , 54 L.Ed.2d 782 (1978); Fey v. Walston, 493 F.2d 1036,1045 (7th Cir.1974); Van Alen v. Dominick & Dominick, Inc., 441 F.Supp. 389, 400 (S.D.N.Y.1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
Howard v. Riggs National Bank
Jacobs v. District Unemployment Compensation Board, D.C.App., 382 A.2d 282 , 286 & n.4 (1978); Rosenberg v. Howle, D.C.Mun.App., 56 A.2d 709, 710 (1948); see Bennett v. Kiggins, D.C.App., 377 A.2d 57, 59 (1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1034 , 98 S.Ct. 768 , 54 L.Ed.2d 782 (1978); W.
discussed
Cited "see"
John X. Wegmann, III v. Howard M. London
See Newburger, Loeb & Co. v. Gross, 563 F.2d 1057, 1082 (2d Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1035 , 98 S.Ct. 769 , 54 L.Ed.2d 782 (1978); United States v. Empire Gas Corp., 537 F.2d 296, 308 (8th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1122 , 97 S.Ct. 1158 , 51 L.Ed.2d 572 (1977). 5 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Zaretsky v. EF Hutton & Co., Inc.
See Newburger, Loeb & Co., Inc. v. Gross, 563 F.2d 1057 (2d Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1035 , 98 S.Ct. 769 , 54 L.Ed.2d 782 (1978); Establissement Tomis v. Shearson Hayden Stone, Inc., CCH Fed.Sec.L.Rep. 197,265 (S.D.N.Y.1980); Faturik v. Wood-mere Securities, Inc., 442 F.Supp. 943, 945 (S.D.N.Y.1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Blank v. Preventive Health Programs, Inc.
See Newburger, Loeb & Co. v. Gross, 563 F.2d 1057, 1082 (2d Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1035 , 98 S.Ct. 769 , 54 L.Ed.2d 782 (1978); Bravman v. Bassett Furniture Ind., Inc., 552 F.2d 90 (3d Cir.) cert. denied, 434 U.S. 823 , 98 S.Ct. 69 , 54 L.Ed.2d 80 (1977); Bradford v. New York Times Co., 501 F.2d 51 (2d Cir. 1974); Frackowiak v. Farmers Ins.
discussed
Cited "see"
Clements v. Chotin Transportation, Inc.
See Marvin v. Central Gulf Lines, Inc., 554 F.2d 1295 (5 Cir. 1977) reh denied, 559 F.2d 29 , cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1035 , 98 S.Ct. 769 , 54 L.Ed.2d 782 (1978); Kent v. Shell Oil Co., 286 F.2d 746 (5 Cir. 1961).
cited
Cited "see"
Meinrath v. Singer Co.
See Newburger, Loeb & Co., Inc. v. Gross, 563 F.2d 1057, 1071 (2d Cir. 1977) (citation omitted), cert, denied, 434 U.S. 1035 , 98 S.Ct. 769 , 54 L.Ed.2d 782 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
Caribe Trailer Systems, Inc. v. Puerto Rico Maritime Shipping Authority
See Tiger Trash v. Browning-Ferris Indus., Inc., 560 F.2d 818, 822 (7th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1034 , 98 S.Ct. 768 , 54 L.Ed.2d 782 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. U. S. Metals Depository Co.
Baxter v. Paimigiano, 425 U.S. 308, 318 , 96 S.Ct. 1551 , 47 L.Ed.2d 810 (1976); see Arthurs v. Stern, 560 F.2d 477, 478 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1034 , 98 S.Ct. 768 , 54 L.Ed.2d 782 (1977); United States ex rel.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Kitt v. Pathmakers, Inc.
See Vassiliades v. Garfinckel's, Brooks Bros., 492 A.2d 580, 587 (D.C.1985); Restatement (Second) of Torts § 652A (1977) (setting out elements of invasion of privacy (false light)); see also Bennett v. Kiggins, 377 A.2d 57, 59-60 (D.C.1977), ce rt. denied, 434 U.S. 1034 , 98 S.Ct. 768 , 54 L.Ed.2d 782 (1978) (same: fraud).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Smith v. Petrou
“Churning is a synonym for overtrading, and simply refers to the excessive rate of turnover in a controlled account for the purpose of increasing the amount of commissions.” Armstrong v. McAlpin, 699 F.2d 79, 91 (2d Cir.1983) (citations omitted); see also Newburger, Loeb & Co. v. Gross, 563 F.2d 1057, 1069 (2d Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1035 , 98 S.Ct. 769 , 54 L.Ed.2d 782 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ayerslee Corp., NV v. Overlook Sponsor Corp.
See, e.g., Newburger, Loeb & Co., Inc. v. Gross, 563 F.2d 1057, 1078 (2d Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1035 , 98 S.Ct. 769 , 54 L.Ed.2d 782 (1978); Riviera Congress Associates v. Yassky, 18 N.Y.2d 540, 547 , 223 N.E.2d 876, 879 , 277 N.Y.S.2d 386, 392 (1966); Lichtyger v. Franchard Corp., 18 N.Y.2d 528, 536-37 , 223 N.E.2d 869, 873-74 , 277 N.Y.S.2d 377, 383-84 (1966); cf. Meinhard v. Salmon, 249 N.Y. 458, 463-64 , 164 N.E. 545, 546 (1928).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lektro-Vend Corporation v. The Vendo Company
See, e. g., Newburger, Loeb & Co. v. Gross, 563 F.2d 1057, 1083 (2d Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1035 , 98 S.Ct. 769 , 54 L.Ed.2d 782 (1978); United States v. Empire Gas Corp., 537 F.2d 296, 308 (8th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1122 , 97 S.Ct. 1158 , 51 L.Ed.2d 572 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lektro-Vend Corp. v. Vendo Co.
See, e. g., Newburger, Loeb & Co. v. Gross, 563 F.2d 1057, 1083 (2d Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1035 , 98 S.Ct. 769 , 54 L.Ed.2d 782 (1978); United States v. Empire Gas Corp., 537 F.2d 296, 308 (8th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1122 , 97 S.Ct. 1158 , 51 L.Ed.2d 572 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Robert P. BIGGANS, Appellant, v. BACHE HALSEY STUART SHIELDS, INC., F/T/A Bache Halsey Stuart, Inc.
(2×)
See, e. g., Newburger, Loeb & Co., Inc. v. Gross, 563 F.2d 1057, 1069 (2d Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1035 , 98 S.Ct. 769 , 54 L.Ed.2d 782 (1978) (and cases cited therein). 10 Bache argues that because the claims asserted by Biggans would be encompassed within the Pennsylvania Securities Act, the statute of limitations provided in that Act governs.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Dorothea Yoggerst v. Stan Stewart, James McDonough Michael Hedges and Ken Kirby
See, e. g., Newburger, Loeb & Co., Inc. v. Gross, 563 F.2d 1057, 1080 (2d Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1035 , 98 S.Ct. 769 , 54 L.Ed.2d 782 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. William D. White and Terry L. Keno
See also Arthurs v. Stern, 560 F.2d 477 (1 Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1034 , 98 S.Ct. 768 , 54 L.Ed.2d 782 (1978); DeVita v. Sills, 422 F.2d 1172 (3 Cir. 1970); United States v. Sloan, 388 F.Supp. 1062 (S.D.N.Y.1975); Keene v. Rodgers, 316 F.Supp. 217 (D.Me.1970).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Marvin
v.
Central Gulf Lines, Inc. (formerly Central Gulf Steamship Corp.)
v.
Central Gulf Lines, Inc. (formerly Central Gulf Steamship Corp.)
No. 77-712.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 16, 1978.
Published
Citer courts: Ninth Circuit (2)
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.