green
Positive treatment
7.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1979 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1979
2002
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 31 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Shoemaker v. Handel
Plante v. Gonzalez, 575 F.2d 1119, 1128 (5th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1129 , 99 S.Ct. 1047 , 59 L.Ed.2d 90 *1106 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Freddie Ocampo Arce and Harold Pineda-Velez
See Shepherd v. Trevino, 575 F.2d 1110, 1115 (5th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1129 , 99 S.Ct. 1047 , 59 L.Ed.2d 90 (1979) (holding that selective disenfranchisement or reenfranchisement of convicted felons is subject to rational basis review).
cited
Cited "see"
William J. Mertens Alex W. Bandrowski James E. Clarke Russell Franz v. Charles H. Black Gerald G. Ferro Richard N. Gary Charles S. Holmes Patrick J. Hunt Robert Merrick George M. Perry Monty H. Rial M. Edward Steward Miles G. Yeagley, and Kaiser Steel Retirement Plan, William J. Mertens v. Kaiser Steel Retirement Plan, William J. Mertens v. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation, and Kaiser Steel Retirement Plan
See Cramer v. General Tel. & Electronics Corp., 582 F.2d 259 , 267 (3d Cir.1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1129 , 99 S.Ct. 1048 , 59 L.Ed.2d 90 (1979); see also Massachusetts Mutual Life Ins.
cited
Cited "see"
Mertens v. Black
See Cramer v. General Tel. & Electronics Corp., 582 F.2d 259 , 267 (3d Cir.1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1129 , 99 S.Ct. 1048 , 59 L.Ed.2d 90 (1979); see also Massachusetts Mutual Life Ins.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Blumenfeld
See Cramer v. General Telephone and Electronics Corporation, 582 F.2d 259, 266 (3d Cir.1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1129 , 99 S.Ct. 1048 , 59 L.Ed.2d 90 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
Riley v. Brazeau
See Cramer v. General Tel. & Electronics Corp., 582 F.2d 259 , 273 (3d Cir.1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1129 , 99 S.Ct. 1048 , 59 L.Ed.2d 90 (1979); Hokama, 566 F.Supp. at 645 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Weldon Wiggins v. Ruth Rushen, Director of the California Department of Corrections, Main Classification Committee at Soledad
(2×)
See Chinese for Affirmative Action v. Lequennec, 580 F.2d 1006 (9th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1129 , 99 S.Ct. 1047 , 59 L.Ed.2d 90 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
Allison Ex Rel. General Motors Corp. v. General Motors Corp.
Clinton Hudson & Sons v. Lehigh Valley Cooperative Farms, Inc., 73 F.R.D. 420, 429 (E.D.Pa.1977) , aff'd mem., 586 F.2d 834 (3d Cir.1978); see Cramer v. General Telephone & Electronics Corp., 582 F.2d 259 (3d Cir.1978), ce rt. denied, 439 U.S. 1129 , 99 S.Ct. 1048 , 59 L.Ed.2d 90 (1979); Halprin v. Babbitt, 303 F.2d 138, 141 (1st Cir.1962).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Wilson
See State v. Matthews, 295 N.C. 265, 289-90 , 245 S.E. 2d 727, 742 (1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1128 , 99 S.Ct. 1046 , 59 L.Ed. 2d 90 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
Forsberg v. HOUSING AUTH. OF CITY OF MIAMI B.
Accord, Plante v. Gonzalez, 575 F.2d 1119, 1136 (5th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1129 , 99 S.Ct. 1047 , 59 L.Ed.2d 90 (1979) (although public official financial privacy was matter of serious concern and deserving of strong protection, the "public interests supporting public disclosure for these elected officials [were] even stronger").
discussed
Cited "see"
35 Fair empl.prac.cas. 606, 34 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 34,497 Stephen Harmon v. San Diego County (A Public Corporation) David K. Speer, Chief Administrative Officer of San Diego County William D. Winterbourne, Director of the Department of Civil Service and Personnel for San Diego County Joseph Stables, David G. Martinez, Veryl J. Mortenson, King O. Taylor, Timothy M. Considine, Members, San Diego County Civil Service Commission
See Chinese for Affirmative Action v. Leguennec, 580 F.2d 1006, 1009 (9th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1129 , 99 S.Ct. 1047 , 59 L.Ed.2d 90 (1979) (plaintiff entitled to fees for appeal where an issue is finally determined on the merits in its favor). * The Honorable Gus J.
discussed
Cited "see"
Harmon v. San Diego County
See Chinese for Affirmative Action v. Leguennec, 580 F.2d 1006, 1009 (9th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1129 , 99 S.Ct. 1047 , 59 L.Ed.2d 90 (1979) (plaintiff entitled to fees for appeal where an issue is finally determined on the merits in its favor).
cited
Cited "see"
Paul B. Owens v. William Barnes, Dauphin County Bureau of Elections, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Intervenor
See Shepherd v. Trevino, 575 F.2d 1110,1114-15 (5th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1129 , 99 S.Ct. 1047 , 59 L.Ed.2d 90 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
Lewis v. Graves
(2×)
See Cramer v. General Telephone & Electronics Corp., 582 F.2d 259, 275 (3d Cir.1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1129 , 99 S.Ct. 1048 , 59 L.Ed.2d 90 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
Lewis v. Graves
(2×)
See Cramer v. General Telephone & Electronics Corp., 582 F.2d 259,275 (3d Cir.1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1129 , 99 S.Ct. 1048 , 59 L.Ed.2d 90 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
George L. Williams v. John Taylor
See Shepherd v. Trevino, 575 F.2d 1110, 1112 (5th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1129 , 99 S.Ct. 1047 , 59 L.Ed.2d 90 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
Lewis v. Curtis
See Cramer v. GT & E Corp., 582 F.2d 259 , 274-75 (3d Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1129 , 99 S.Ct. 1048 , 59 L.Ed.2d 90 (1979); Landy v. FDIC, 486 F.2d 139, 146 (3d Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 416 U.S. 960 , 94 S.Ct. 1979 , 40 L.Ed.2d 312 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
Lewis v. Curtis
See Cramer v. GT & E Corp., 582 F.2d 259 , 274-75 (3d Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1129 , 99 S.Ct. 1048 , 59 L.Ed.2d 90 (1979); Landy v. FDIC, 486 F.2d 139,146 (3d Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 416 U.S. 960 , 94 S.Ct. 1979 , 40 L.Ed.2d 312 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,000 Ora E. Gaines v. D. J. Haughton, Lois A. And James Fitzpatrick v. D. J. Haughton
(2×)
Accord, Cramer v. GTE Corp., 582 F.2d 259 , 269-70 (3d Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1129 , 99 S.Ct. 1048 , 59 L.Ed.2d 90 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
St. Michael's Convalescent Hospital v. The State Of California
See, Plante v. Gonzalez, 575 F.2d 1119 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1129 , 99 S.Ct. 1047 , 59 L.Ed.2d 90 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
St. Michael's Convalescent Hospital v. California
See, Plante v. Gonzalez, 575 F.2d 1119 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1129 , 99 S.Ct. 1047 , 59 L.Ed.2d 90 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
Abramowitz v. Posner
We see no threat to the purity of the securities market from our interpretation of California law.” Lewis, supra, 615 F.2d at 783; see Cramer v. General Telephone & Electronics Corp., 582 F.2d 259, 273-76 (3d Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1129 , 99 S.Ct. 1048 , 59 L.Ed.2d 90 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
Ross v. Warner
See Cramer v. General Telephone & Electronics Corp., 582 F.2d 259 (3d Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1129 , 99 S.Ct. 1048 , 59 L.Ed.2d 90 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
Slevin v. City of New York
See generally Judge Wisdom’s typically illuminating analysis in Plante v. Gonzalez, 575 F.2d 1119 (5th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1129 , 99 S.Ct. 1047 , 59 L.Ed.2d 90 (1979).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Skinner
Borucki v. Ryan, 827 F.2d 836, 840 (1st Cir.1987); see, e.g., Plante v. Gonzalez, 575 F.2d 1119, 1128 (5th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1129 , 99 S.Ct. 1047 , 59 L.Ed.2d 90 (1978).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Cuker v. Mikalauskas
See e.g., Cramer v. General Telephone & Electronics Corp., 582 F.2d 259, 274 (3d Cir.1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1129 , 99 S.Ct. 1048 , 59 L.Ed.2d 90 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ciro, Inc. v. Gold
Blue Chip Stamps, 421 U.S. at 738 , 95 S.Ct. at 1926 ; see also Cramer v. General Tel. & Electronics Corp., 582 F.2d 259 , 269 (3d Cir.1978) cert. denied 439 U.S. 1129 , 99 S.Ct. 1048 , 59 L.Ed.2d 90 (1979); Schoenbaun v. Firstbrook, 405 F.2d 215, 219 (2d Cir.1968); Phillips v. Tobin, 403 F.Supp. 89, 94 (S.D.N.Y.1975); Ruckle v. Roto American Corp., 339 F.2d 24, 27-29 (2d Cir.1964).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Alford v. Shaw
(2×)
See also Cramer v. General Telephone & Electronics Corp., 3d Cir., 582 F.2d 259, 275 (1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1129 , 99 S.Ct. 1048 , 59 L.Ed.2d 90 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Kronfeld v. First Jersey National Bank
For example, Count 1 alleges that the conspirator defendants and co-conspirators, “in connection with the sale of bonds for Projects 4 and 5,” made “in connection with the bonds, misrepresentations of material fact and omitted to state material facts necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances in which they were made, not misleading.” Amended Complaint, 1135; see also id., Count III, 1158.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
J. P., M. R., Cross-Appellees v. Andrew J. Desanti, Cross-Appellants
See also, Plante v. Gonzalez, 575 F.2d 1119, 1132, 1134 (5th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1129 , 99 S.Ct. 1047 , 59 L.Ed.2d 90 (1979) (Whalen v. Roe identified a strand of privacy called the “right to confidentiality.” A balancing standard is appropriate in weighing intrusions on this right). 3 We do not view the discussion of confidentiality in Whalen v. Roe as overruling *1089 Paul v. Davis and creating a constitutional right to have all government action weighed against the resulting breach of confidentiality.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Zapata Corp. v. Maldonado
See also Cramer v. General Telephone & Electronics Corp., 3d Cir., 582 F.2d 259, 275 (1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1129 , 99 S.Ct. 1048 , 59 L.Ed.2d 90 (1979).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Cramer
v.
General Telephone & Electronics Corp.
v.
General Telephone & Electronics Corp.
No. 78-853.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 22, 1979.
Published
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.