Woe v. Nebraska State Dep't of Pub. Welfare, 443 U.S. 913 (1979). · Go Syfert
Search
Woe v. Nebraska State Dep't of Pub. Welfare, 443 U.S. 913 (1979). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“prohibition is an extraordinary writ designed to assure regularity in judicial proceedings by preventing unlawful exercise or abuse of jurisdiction”
82 citation events (2 in the last 25 years) across 24 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Municipal Publications, Inc. v. Snyder (pa, 1983-11-30)
Treatment trajectory · 1980 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1980 2003 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Municipal Publications, Inc. v. Snyder (2×) also: Cited "see"
Pa. · 1983 · signal: see · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
prohibition is an extraordinary writ designed to assure regularity in judicial proceedings by preventing unlawful exercise or abuse of jurisdiction
discussed Cited "see" Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc. v. Paper, Allied Industrial Chemical & Energy Workers International Union Local 4-487
5th Cir. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
See General Warehousemen & Helpers Local 767 v. Standard Brands, Inc., 579 F.2d 1282, 1285 (5th Cir.1978) (en banc), cert. denied, 441 U.S. 957 , 99 S.Ct. 2420 , 60 L.Ed.2d 1075 (1979), and cert. denied, 443 U.S. 913 , 99 S.Ct. 3103 , 61 L.Ed.2d 877 (1979).
discussed Cited "see" Pioneer Nat Resrc v. Paper Allied Indust
5th Cir. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
See General Warehousemen & Helpers Local 767 v. Standard Brands, Inc., 579 F.2d 1282, 1285 (5th Cir.1978) (en banc), cert. denied, 441 U.S. 957 , 99 S.Ct. 2420 , 60 L.Ed.2d 1075 (1979), and cert. denied, 443 U.S. 913 , 99 S.Ct. 3103 , 61 L.Ed.2d 877 (1979).
discussed Cited "see" Miller Brewing Company v. Brewery Workers Local Union No. 9, Afl-Cio
7th Cir. · 1984 · signal: see · confidence high
See General Warehousemen & Helpers Local 767 v. Standard Brands, Inc., 579 F.2d 1282, 1292-93 (5th Cir.1978) (en banc), cert. dismissed, 441 U.S. 957 , 99 S.Ct. 2420 , 60 L.Ed.2d 1075 , 443 U.S. 913 , 99 S.Ct. 3103 , 61 L.Ed.2d 877 (1979).
discussed Cited "see" Industrial Mutual Association, Inc. v. Amalgamated Workers, Local Union No. 383
6th Cir. · 1984 · signal: see · confidence high
See General Warehousemen and Helpers Local 767 v. Standard Brands, Inc., 579 F.2d 1282, 1294-95 (5th Cir.1978) (en banc), cert. dismissed, 441 U.S. 957 , 99 S.Ct. 2420 , 60 L.Ed.2d 1075 , 443 U.S. 913 , 99 S.Ct. 3103 , 61 L.Ed.2d 877 (1979).
cited Cited "see, e.g." KUTV, INC. v. Conder
Utah · 1983 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Philadelphia Newspapers, Inc. v. Jerome, 478 Pa. 484 , 494-95 & n. 11, 387 A.2d 425 , 430 & n. 11 (1978), appeal dismissed, 443 U.S. 913 , 99 S.Ct. 3104 , 61 L.Ed.2d 877 (1979).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Local No. P-1236, Amalgamated Meat Cutters & Butcher Workmen v. Jones Dairy Farm
W.D. Wis. · 1981 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e. g., General Warehousemen & Helpers v. Standard Brands, 579 F.2d 1282 (5th Cir. 1978) cert. denied, 441 U.S. 957 , 99 S.Ct. 2420 , 60 L.Ed.2d 1075 , 443 U.S. 913 , 99 S.Ct. 3103 , 61 L.Ed.2d 877 (1979) (affirming district court’s refusal to enforce an arbitration award where the award required the defendant employer to benefit one group of employees in a way that would violate the terms of a separate collective bargaining agreement which the employer had entered into with a second group of employees); Glendale Manufacturing Co. v. Local No. 520, 283 F.2d 936 (4th Cir. 1960) cert. deni…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Woe
v.
Nebraska State Department of Public Welfare
No. A-1089.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 27, 1979.
443 U.S. 913
Application, Consideration, Took.
Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 57%
Citer courts: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania (1)

Application to vacate stay entered May 25, 1979, by the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, addressed to Mr. Justice Marshall and referred to the Court, denied.

Mr. Justice White took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.