Sebring Utils. Comm'n v. Fed. Energy Regulatory Comm'n, 444 U.S. 879 (1979). · Go Syfert
Search
Sebring Utils. Comm'n v. Fed. Energy Regulatory Comm'n, 444 U.S. 879 (1979). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
56 citation events across 13 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: City of Farmington, New Mexico v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Amoco Production Company, Amoco Gas Company, Intervenors (cadc, 1987-06-16)
Treatment trajectory · 1980 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1980 2003 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" City of Farmington, New Mexico v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Amoco Production Company, Amoco Gas Company, Intervenors (2×)
D.C. Cir. · 1987 · signal: see · confidence high
See Sebring Utilities Commission v. FERC, 591 F.2d 1003, 1017 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 879 , 100 S.Ct. 167 , 62 L.Ed.2d 109 (1979); American Public Gas Association v. FERC, 587 F.2d 1089 , 1097 n. 9 (D.C.Cir.1978) (per curiam). 32 Second, such arrangements obviously have no direct effect on the cost of service to out-of-state customers, as in Lo-Vaca.
cited Cited "see" Shepherd Oil, Inc. v. Atlantic Richfield Co.
Temp. Emerg. Ct. App. · 1984 · signal: accord · confidence high
Accord Citronelle-Mobile Gathering, Inc. v. Gulf Oil Corp., 591 F.2d 711, 715-16 (Em.App.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 879 , 100 S.Ct. 168 , 62 L.Ed.2d 109 (1979).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Purvis
S.D.N.Y. · 1982 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Schlesinger, 598 F.2d 722, 726 (2d Cir.) (Lumbard, J.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 880 , *71 100 S.Ct. 168 , 62 L.Ed.2d 109 (1979); United States v. Weinstein, 511 F.2d 622, 627 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 422 U.S. 1042 , 95 S.Ct. 2655 , 45 L.Ed.2d 693 (1975).
cited Cited "see" United States v. George Zappola and Robert Melli
2d Cir. · 1981 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Schlesinger, 598 F.2d 722 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 880 , 100 S.Ct. 168 , 62 L.Ed.2d 109 (1979). 5 .
discussed Cited "see" Citronelle-Mobile Gathering, Inc. v. O'LEARY
S.D. Ala. · 1980 · signal: see · confidence high
See generally Citronelle-Mobile Gathering, Inc. v. Gulf Oil Corp., 420 F.Supp. 162 (S.D.Ala.1976), remanded, 578 F.2d 1149 (5th Cir. 1978), appeal dism’d, 591 F.2d 711 (Em.App.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 879 , 100 S.Ct. 168 , 62 L.Ed.2d 109 (1979).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Pennzoil Exploration & Production Co. v. Lujan
Temp. Emerg. Ct. App. · 1991 · signal: see also · confidence low
When an appeal involves issues only part of which arise under , the EPAA, this Court will decide only those arising under the EPAA, Sector Refining, Inc. v. Enterprise Refining Co., 771 F.2d 496, 502 (Em.App.1985); Texaco, 616 F.2d at 1198 ; see also Atlantic Richfield Co. v. U.S. Dept. of Energy, 769 F.2d 771, 778 (D.C.Cir.1984), unless a meaningful ruling requires consid eration of the issues as a whole, Citronelle-Mobile, Etc. v. Gulf Oil Corp., 591 F.2d 711, 716 (Em.App.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 879 , 100 S.Ct. 168 , 62 L.Ed.2d 109 (1979), the construction of the EPAA will control - the li…
cited Cited "see, e.g." McWhirter Distributing Co. v. Texaco Inc.
Temp. Emerg. Ct. App. · 1981 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Citronelle-Mobile v. Gulf Oil Corp., 591 F.2d 711 (TECA), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 879 , 100 S.Ct. 168 , 62 L.Ed.2d 109 (1979).
cited Cited "see, e.g." The Public Service Commission of the State of New York v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Commonwealth Gas Pipeline Corp., Carolina Pipeline Corporation, Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corporation, Intervenors. North Carolina Natural Gas Corporation, Public Service Company of North Carolina, Inc., Piedmont Natural Gas Company, Inc. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Carolina Pipeline Company, Commonwealth Gas Pipeline Corporation, Public Service Commission of the State of New York, Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corp., Brooklyn Union Gas Co., Columbia Gas Transmission Corp., Washington Gas Light Company, Atlanta Gas Light Company, Intervenors. North Carolina Utilities Commission v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Carolina Pipeline Company, Commonwealth Gas Pipeline Corporation, Public Service Commission of the State of New York, Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corp., Brooklyn Union Gas Co., Columbia Gas Transmission Corp., Washington Gas Light Company, Atlanta Gas Light Company, North Carolina Natural Gas Corp., Intervenors. Long Island Lighting Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corp., North Carolina Natural Gas Corp., North Carolina Utilities Commission, Carolina Pipeline Company, Commonwealthgas Pipeline Corporation, Public Service Commission of the State of New York, Brooklyn Union Gas Company, Washington Gas Light Company, Atlanta Gas Light Company, Intervenors. The Brooklyn Union Gas Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corp., Public Service Commission of the State of New York, Commonwealth Gas Pipeline Corporation, North Carolina Natural Gas Corp., North Carolina Utilities Commission, Washington Gas Light Company, Atlanta Gas Light Company, Intervenors. Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corporation v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Carolina Pipeline Company, North Carolina Natural Gas Corp., Brooklyn Union Gas Company, Intervenors
D.C. Cir. · 1980 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e. g., Sebring Utilities Comm'n v. FERC, 591 F.2d 1003, 1015-16 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 879 , 100 S.Ct. 167 , 62 L.Ed.2d 109 (1979).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Public Service Commission v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
D.C. Cir. · 1980 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e. g., Sebring Utilities Comm’n v. FERC, 591 F.2d 1003, 1015-16 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 879 , 100 S.Ct. 167 , 62 L.Ed.2d 109 (1979).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Mahoney
E.D. Pa. · 1980 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare United States v. Schlesinger, 598 F.2d 722 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 880 , 100 S.Ct. 168 , 62 L.Ed.2d 109 (1979) (use of summaries analyzed under Estepa test and found valid); United States v. Brown, 574 F.2d 1274 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1046 , 99 S.Ct. 720 , 58 L.Ed.2d 704 (1978) (use of summaries not an abuse of grand jury procedures, since grand jury function is not adversarial, but only to determine probable cause); United States v. Carcaise, 442 F.Supp. 1209 (M.D.Fla. 1978) (summary testimony is not per se impermissible); United States v. International Paper Co.…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Sebring Utilities Commission
v.
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
No. 78-1878.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 1, 1979.
444 U.S. 879
Consideration, Took.
Cited by 46 opinions  |  Published

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Stewart took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.