green
Positive treatment
9.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 1980 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1980
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 29 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
United States v. Smith
But see United States v. DiGregorio, 605 F.2d 1184, 1190 (1st Cir.) ("where the confession does not name a codefendant, it may be admitted under Cleveland solely against the confessor”), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 937 , 100 S.Ct. 287 , 62 L.Ed.2d 197 (1979). 2 .
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Ferrell v. State
(2×)
In Powers v. State, 285 Md. 269 , 401 A.2d 1031 , cert. denied 444 U.S. 937 , 100 S.Ct. 288 , 62 L.Ed.2d 197 (1979), the Court of Appeals, after reviewing what it regarded as the relevant pronouncements of the Supreme Court, concluded that “the doctrine of collateral estoppel applies after a jury, at a single trial, acquits on one count of a multicount indictment and is unable to agree upon a verdict on a related count of the same indictment involving a common issue of ultimate fact, which if found in favor of an accused would establish his innocence on both counts.” Id., at 288, 401 A.2d …
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
United States v. Mohammed Reza Mehrmanesh
(2×)
Because the record indicates only a single distribution, [the two counts] are multiplicitous.” Id. at 325 (emphasis added).
cited
Cited "see"
Janes v. State
See Powers v. State, 285 Md. 269 , 401 A.2d 1031 , cert. denied, 444 U.S. 937 , 100 S.Ct. 288 , 62 L.Ed.2d 197 (1979); Bowling v. State, supra, 298 Md. 396 , 470 A.2d 797 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Jose Tormos-Vega, United States of America v. Juan Luis Boscio
See United States v. Jarabek, 726 *1113 F.2d 889, 901 (1st Cir.1984) (Hobbs Act requires a “ ‘realistic probability that extortionate transaction will have some effect on interstate commerce’ ”) (quoting United States v. DiGregorio, 605 F.2d 1184, 1190 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 937 , 100 S.Ct. 287 , 62 L.Ed.2d 197 (1979)) (quoting United States v. Hathaway, 534 F.2d 386, 396 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 819 , 97 S.Ct. 64 , 50 L.Ed.2d 79 (1976)) (emphasis added).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Biernacki
See, United States v. Horton, 601 F.2d 319 (7th Cir. 1979), cert. denied 444 U.S. 937 , 100 S. Ct. 287 , 62 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Michael D. McKenna United States of America v. Robert v. Campo
See United States v. DiGregorio, 605 F.2d 1184, 1191 (1st Cir.) (stating that even if nothing was built “during the period involved, the extortion could be reasonably thought to interfere with probable future interstate commerce_”), cer t. denied, 444 U.S. 937 , 100 S.Ct. 287 , 62 L.Ed.2d 197 (1979). 5 While appellants claim that EBD was not doing business in interstate commerce during the period of the indictment, that assertion was disputed by the district court, and true or not, it does not alone answer the question of whether the home rule petition had a realistic probability of affect…
discussed
Cited "see"
Nathaniel Mathes v. United States
See, e.g., United States v. Kolodziej, 706 F.2d 590 , reh'g denied, 712 F.2d 975 (5th Cir.1983); United States v. Salisbury, 662 F.2d 738 (11th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 457 U.S. 1107 , 102 S.Ct. 2907 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1316 (1982); United States Osser, 483 F.2d 727 (3rd Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1028 , 94 S.Ct. 457 , 38 L.Ed.2d 321 (1973); Cooper v. United States, 594 F.2d 12 (4th Cir.1979); accord United States v. Horton, 601 F.2d 319 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 937 , 100 S.Ct. 287 , 62 L.Ed.2d 197 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Edgardo Giorgi, United States of America v. Gilberto Ocasio-Gonzalez, United States of America v. Pedro M. Gonzalez-Sanchez
See United States v. DiGregorio, 605 F.2d 1184, 1189 (1st Cir.), cert. denied 444 U.S. 437 , 100 S.Ct. 287 , 62 L.Ed.2d 197 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Anthony J. Bucci, Sr. And Ronald H. Glantz
See United States v. Digregorio, 605 F.2d 1184, 1191 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 937 , 100 S.Ct. 287 , 62 L.Ed.2d 197 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Mahomud Rawwad
See United States v. DiGregorio, 605 F.2d 1184, 1190 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 937 , 100 S.Ct. 287 , 62 L.Ed.2d 197 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. James M. Albert
See United States v. Digregorio, 605 F.2d 1184, 1190 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 937 , 100 S.Ct. 287 , 62 L.Ed.2d 197 (1979); see also United States v. Brooklier, 685 F.2d 1208, 1218 (9th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1206 , 103 S.Ct. 1194 , 75 L.Ed.2d 439 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Sell
See United States v. Horton, 601 F.2d 319, 320-21 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 937 , 100 S.Ct. 287 , 62 L.Ed.2d 197 (1979). .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Aristedes Drougas, United States of America v. Michael A. Karahalis, United States of America v. Arnold W. Ellis, Jr., United States of America v. Alfonso Defeo, United States of America v. Salvatore Alba
See United States v. Digregorio, 605 F.2d 1184, 1192 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 937 , 100 S.Ct. 287 , 62 L.Ed.2d 197 (1979); Elam, 678 F.2d at 1245 ; Brito, 721 F.2d at 747 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Drougas
See United States v. Digregorio, 605 F.2d 1184, 1192 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 937 , 100 S.Ct. 287 , 62 L.Ed.2d 197 (1979); Elam, 678 F.2d at 1245 ; Brito, 721 F.2d at 747 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Kelly, Michael, in No. 82-1539 and United States of America v. Kelly, Stephen, in No. 82-1541
(2×)
See United States v. Horton, 601 F.2d 319, 322 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 937 , 100 S.Ct. 287 , 62 L.Ed.2d 197 (1979); Moskow, 588 F.2d at 891 ; United States v. Juarez, 573 F.2d 267, 278 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 915 , 99 S.Ct. 289 , 58 L.Ed.2d 262 (1978); Osser, 483 F.2d at 730 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Alvord v. Wainwright
Leland; see Walker v. Butterworth, 599 F.2d 1074 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 937 , 100 S.Ct. 288 , 62 L.Ed.2d 197 (1979); United States v. Greene, 489 F.2d 1145 (D.C.Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 977 , 95 S.Ct. 239 , 42 L.Ed.2d 190 (1974).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Kimball
See United States v. DiGregorio, 605 F.2d 1184, 1188 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 937 , 100 S.Ct. 287 , 62 L.Ed.2d 197 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Josephine Cordero, Etc., United States of America v. William Sorren, A/K/A Bill
See United States v. DiGregorio, 605 F.2d 1184, 1192 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 937 , 100 S.Ct. 287 , 62 L.Ed.2d 197 (1979), United States v. Morado, 454 F.2d at 169-72 . 15 *43 We are disturbed by the fact that appellant Cordero’s brief, while purporting to set forth all the significant evidence and claiming that it was insufficient for conviction, did not refer to more of the unfavorable evidence we have discussed here.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Leitman v. Mcausland
See, e.g., United States v. Horton, 601 F.2d 319 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 937 , 100 S.Ct. 287 , 62 L.Ed.2d 197 (1979); United States v. Keen, 508 F.2d 986 (9th Cir.1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 929 , 95 S.Ct. 1655 , 44 L.Ed.2d 86 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Leitman v. McAusland
See, e.g., United States v. Horton, 601 F.2d 319 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 937 , 100 S.Ct. 287 , 62 L.Ed.2d 197 (1979); United States v. Keen, 508 F.2d 986 (9th Cir.1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 929 , 95 S.Ct. 1655 , 44 L.Ed.2d 86 (1975).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Simms v. State
See Ashe v. Swenson, 397 U.S. 436 , 90 S.Ct. 1189 , 25 L.Ed.2d 469 (1970); see also Powers v. State, 285 Md. 269 , 401 A.2d 1031 , cert. denied, 444 U.S. 937 , 100 S.Ct. 288 , 62 L.Ed.2d 197 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Wesley v. State
See also Walker v. Butterworth , 599 F.2d 1074 , 1079-80 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 937 , 100 S.Ct. 288 , 62 L.Ed.2d 197 (1979); Queen v. State , 189 Ga. App. 161 , 375 S.E.2d 287 , 290 (1988); Loftin v. State , 180 Ga. App. 613 , 349 S.E.2d 777 , 779 (1986); State v. Lee , 395 So.2d 700 , 702-03 (La. 1981). 6 Furthermore, "[a]s in Patterson [and Martin ], the jury was here instructed that to convict it must find, in light of all the evidence , that each of [the] elements of the crime of [capital] murder must be proved by the State beyond reasonable doubt and that the burden of proof w…
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Guy Mickey McNulty George O'brien, Theodore Tulper, Donald Staadts, James Nestoff and Dennis Valley
(4×)
See, e.g., United States v. Horton, 601 F.2d 319 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 937 , 100 S.Ct. 287 , 62 L.Ed.2d 197 (1979); United States v. Nelligan, 573 F.2d 251 (5th Cir.1978); United States v. Shaffer, 520 F.2d 1369 (3d Cir.1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1051 , 96 S.Ct. 779 , 46 L.Ed.2d 640 (1976); United States v. Neville, 516 F.2d 1302, 1309 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 925 , 96 S.Ct. 269 , 46 L.Ed.2d 251 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. John Henry Butera, Robert Andrew Denoma
United States v. Nelligan, 573 F.2d 251, 253 (5th Cir. 1978) (cites omitted); see also United States v. Horton, 601 F.2d 319, 323 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 937 , 100 S.Ct. 287 , 62 L.Ed.2d 197 (1979); United States v. Testa, 548 F.2d 847 (9th Cir. 1977); United States v. Shaffer, 520 F.2d 1369, 1372 (3d Cir. 1975), cert. denied sub. nom.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
US Ex Rel. Boothe v. SUPERINTENDENT, ETC.
Contumacious or not, every defendant is entitled to the presumption of innocence which, "although not articulated in the Constitution, is a basic component of a fair trial under our system of criminal justice." Estelle v. Williams, 425 U.S. 501, 503 , 96 S.Ct. 1691, 1692 , 48 L.Ed.2d 126 (1976) (prison clothes); see also Walker v. Butterworth, 599 F.2d 1074, 1080 (1st Cir.), cert. den., 444 U.S. 937 , 100 S.Ct. 288 , 62 L.Ed.2d 197 (1979) (confinement of defendant to "prisoner dock" during trial "may create the impression that he is somehow different or dangerous").
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States ex rel. Boothe v. Superintendent, Woodbourne Correctional Facility
Contumacious or not, every defendant is entitled to the presumption of innocence which, “although not articulated in the Constitution, is a basic component of a fair trial under our system of criminal justice.” Estelle v. Williams, 425 U.S. 501, 503 , 96 S.Ct. 1691, 1692 , 48 L.Ed.2d 126 (1976) (prison clothes); see also Walker v. Butter-worth, 599 F.2d 1074, 1080 (1st Cir.), cert. den., 444 U.S. 937 , 100 S.Ct. 288 , 62 L.Ed.2d 197 (1979) (confinement of defendant to “prisoner dock” during trial “may create the impression that he is somehow different or dangerous”).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Pike
See also Powers v. State, 285 Md. 269 , 401 A.2d 1031 , cert. denied, 444 U.S. 937 , 100 S. Ct. 288 , 62 L.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Butterworth, Correctional Superintendent
v.
Walker
v.
Walker
No. 79-371.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 29, 1979.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
C. A. 1st Cir. Motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari denied.