Goldfeld v. Henderson, 444 U.S. 968 (1979). · Go Syfert
Goldfeld v. Henderson, 444 U.S. 968 (1979). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
66 citation events across 18 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Cabais v. Egger (dcd, 1981-08-27)
Treatment trajectory · 1980 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1980 2003 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Cabais v. Egger
D.D.C. · 1981 · confidence medium
In upholding Congress’s restructuring of railroad retirement benefits to prevent a windfall to some employees who were also eligible for social security, the Court, quoting from Dandridge , stated: “If a classification has some ‘reasonable basis,’ it does not offend the Constitution simply because the classification ‘is not made with mathematical nicety or because in practice it results in some inequality.’ ... ‘The problems of government are practical ones and may justify, if they do not require, rough accommodations — illogical, it may be and unscientific.’ ” Id., 100 S.C…
cited Cited "see" United States v. William Harry Hack, Jr., Lucas Clinton Owens
10th Cir. · 1986 · signal: see · confidence high
See Rummel v. Texas, 445 U.S. 263 , 100 S.Ct. 1133 , 62 L.Ed.2d 382 (1980).
discussed Cited "see" Johnny B. Milton v. P.J. Morris, Warden (2×)
9th Cir. · 1985 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Lee, 589 F.2d 980, 991 (9th Cir.) (brief discussion showing the absence of any real conflict is sufficient inquiry), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 969 , 100 S.Ct. 460 , 62 L.Ed.2d 382 (1979).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Honore M'biye
D.C. Cir. · 1981 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Lee, 589 F.2d 980, 987 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 969 , 100 S.Ct. 460 , 62 L.Ed.2d 382 (1979).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Larouche v. Webster
S.D.N.Y. · 1996 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
Furthermore, under Federal Rule of Evidence 803(10) (“Rule 803(10)”), an affiant may testify to the absence of records where, “after a diligent search of the records regularly kept by a public office or agency, a certain record, entity, report, etc., has not been found.” United States v. Pinto-Mejia, 720 F.2d 248, 257 (2d Cir.1983) (citation omitted); United States v. Gallego, 913 F.Supp. 209, 216 (S.D.N.Y.1996) (same); see, e.g., United States v. Lee, 589 F.2d 980, 988 (9th Cir.1979) (upholding admissibility of affidavits by CIA officials, which described absence of records, because a…
examined Cited "see, e.g." Sims v. Collection Division of the Utah State Tax Commission (4×)
Utah · 1992 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., People v. Estrada, 68 Ill.App.3d 272 , 24 Ill.Dec. 924, 929-30 , 386 N.E.2d 128, 133-34 , cert. denied, 444 U.S. 968 , 100 S.Ct. 459 , 62 L.Ed.2d 382 (1979).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Phillip H. Nicely
D.C. Cir. · 1991 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., United States v. Lee, 589 F.2d 980, 988 (9th Cir.1979) (upholding introduction of affidavits prepared by three CIA officials stating that a search of their records failed to reveal any entries for the defendant), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 969 , 100 S.Ct. 460 , 62 L.Ed.2d 382 (1979).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Kenneth Harold Gourley
10th Cir. · 1987 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also United States v. Gomer, 603 F.2d 147, 150 (10th Cir.1979), cert. denied 444 U.S. 969 , 100 S.Ct. 460 , 62 L.Ed.2d 382 [“insofar as defendant is contending that deviation from the Justice Department’s ‘Petite policy’ requires reversal, the law in this circuit simply forecloses that argument”]; United States v. Padilla, supra; United States v. Valenzuela, 584 F.2d 374 (10th Cir.1978); United States v. Fritz, 580 F.2d 370 (10th Cir.), cert. denied 439 U.S. 947 , 99 S.Ct. 340 , 58 L.Ed.2d 338 (1978).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Duvall (2×)
N.C. Ct. App. · 1981 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also State v. Vega, 40 N.C.App. 326 , 253 S.E.2d 94 , disc. rev. denied, 297 N.C. 457 , cert. denied, 444 U.S. 968 , 100 S.Ct. 459 , 62 L.Ed.2d 382 (1979); Cox, supra. Defendant contends that certain comments made by the judge in the presence of the jury and his refusal to recess upon defendant's motion illustrate Judge Brown's actual prejudice toward defendant and created an unfavorable atmosphere during the course of the trial.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Goldfeld
v.
Henderson, Correctional Superintendent
No. 79-5234.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 26, 1979.
444 U.S. 968
Published

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.