green
Positive treatment
5.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 1980 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1980
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 25 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Southern Card v Lawson Mardon Label
See Spartan Grain & Mill Co. v. Ayers, 581 F.2d 419, 428 (5th Cir. 1978) (“The Clayton Act, passed as a response to what Congress considered grudging constructions of the Sherman Act by the courts, specifically bans tying arrangements.”), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 831 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
Southern Card & Novelty, Inc. v. Lawson Mardon Label, Inc.
(2×)
See Spartan Grain & Mill Co. v. Ayers, 581 F.2d 419, 428 (5th Cir.1978) (“The Clayton Act, passed as a response to what Congress considered grudging constructions of the Sherman Act by the courts, specifically bans tying arrangements.”), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 831 , 100 S.Ct. 59 , 62 L.Ed.2d 39 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
Ritterbusch v. Holt
See Shapiro v. Columbia Union National Bank and Trust Co., 576 S.W.2d 310, 312 (Mo. banc 1978), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 831 , 100 S.Ct. 60 , 62 L.Ed.2d 40 (1979); Concerned Parents v. Caruthersville School District 18, 548 S.W.2d 554, 558 (Mo. banc 1977).
cited
Cited "see"
Dillard Department Stores, Inc. v. Muegler
See Shapiro v. Columbia Union National Bank & Trust Co., 576 S.W.2d 310, 312 (Mo. banc 1978), cert. den., 444 U.S. 831 , 100 S.Ct. 60 , 62 L.Ed.2d 40 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
Smith v. Wells Fargo Credit Corp.
(2×)
See Spartan Grain and Mill Co. v. Ayers, 581 F.2d 419 (5th Cir.1978), cert, denied. 444 U.S. 831 , 100 S.Ct. 59 , 62 L.Ed.2d 39 (1979) (although compulsory status might be considered, the court held that the claim was more appropriately deemed permissive; the TILA claim involved entirely separate questions of law and fact); Zeltzer v. Carte Blanche Corp. 414 F.Supp. 1221 (WD.Pa.1976) (while the two claims stem from the same underlying business transaction, they involve entirely distinct legal issues, and thus the court found the claim to be permissive), Roberts v. National School of Radio and …
discussed
Cited "see"
Nobel Scientific Industries, Inc. v. Beckman Instruments, Inc.
(2×)
See, for example, Spartan Grain & Mill Co. v. Ayers, 581 F.2d 419, 428 (5th Cir.1978), cert. denied 444 U.S. 831 , 100 S.Ct. 59 , 62 L.Ed.2d 39 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
Wickliffe v. Duckworth
See U.S. v. Conroy, 589 F.2d 1258 (5th Cir.), cert, denied, 444 U.S. 831 , 100 S.Ct. 60 , 62 L.Ed.2d 40 (1979); U.S. v. Grismore, 546 F.2d 844 (10th Cir.1976).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Ammar
See United States v. Conroy, 589 F.2d 1258, 1273 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 831 , 100 S.Ct. 60 , 62 L.Ed.2d 40 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Ammar
See United States v. Conroy, 589 F.2d 1258, 1273 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 831 , 100 S.Ct. 60 , 62 L.Ed.2d 40 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
Transportes Aeros Mercantiles Panamericanos v. Boyatt
United States v. Morrow, 537 F.2d 120, 139-141 (5th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 956 , 97 S.Ct. 1602 , 51 L.Ed.2d 806 (1977); Birdsell v. United States, 346 F.2d 775, 783 (5th Cir.1965); United States v. Toscanino, 500 F.2d at 280 ; See United States v. Conroy, 589 F.2d 1258 , 1265 n. 9 (5th Cir.1979), reh. denied, 594 F.2d 241 , cert. denied, 444 U.S. 831 , 100 S.Ct. 60 , 62 L.Ed.2d 40 (cases cited therein).
cited
Cited "see"
Petition for Naturalization of Antonio Olegario v. United States
See United States v. Conroy, 589 F.2d 1258, 1266 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 831 , 100 S.Ct. 60 , 62 L.Ed.2d 40 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. John Glenn Peters
See United States v. Conroy, 589 F.2d 1258, 1273 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 831 , 100 S.Ct. 60 , 62 L.Ed.2d 40 (1979).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Watson v. State
Young v. State, 451 So.2d 208, 210 (Miss.1984); see also U.S. v. Conroy, 589 F.2d 1258, 1273 (5th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 831 , 100 S.Ct. 60 , 62 L.Ed.2d 40 (1979).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Juda
See, e.g., United States v. Conroy, 589 F.2d 1258, 1264 (CA5), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 831 [ 100 S.Ct. 60 , 62 L.Ed.2d 40 ] (1979); United States v. Rose, 570 F.2d 1358, 1362 (CA9 1978).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Murphy v. State
Young v. State, 451 So.2d 208, 210 (Miss. 1984); see also U.S. v. Conroy, 589 F.2d 1258, 1273 (5th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 831 , 100 S.Ct. 60 , 62 L.Ed.2d 40 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Verdugo-Urquidez
(2×)
See, e. g., United States v. Conroy, 589 F. 2d 1258, 1264 (CA5), cert. denied, 444 U. S. 831 (1979); United States v. Rose, 570 F. 2d 1358, 1362 (CA9 1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Sabino Antonio Rubio
Jury Instructions “It has long been well established in this Circuit that it is reversible error to refuse a charge on a defense theory for which there is an evidentiary foundation and which, if believed by the jury, would be legally sufficient to render the accused innocent.” United States v. Lewis, 592 F.2d 1282, 1285 (5th Cir.1979); see also, United States v. Conroy, 589 F.2d 1258, 1273 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 831 , 100 S.Ct. 60 , 62 L.Ed.2d 40 (1979) and cases cited therein. “[I]f there is any evidentiary support whatsoever for a legal defense, and the trial court’s atte…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Peterson Irrevocable Trust 2 for benefit of Peterson v. Commissioner
See also Dayton Hydraulic Co. v. United States, 592 F.2d 937 (6th Cir. 1979) (per curiam), cert. denied 444 U.S. 831 (1979) .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Wortham v. State
See also United States v. Conroy, 589 F.2d 1258, 1273-74 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 831 , 100 S.Ct. 60 , 62 L.Ed.2d 40 (1979) (instruction which was given conveyed the substance of defense theory even if not in the exact language requested).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Albert Green
See United Slates v. Dominguez, 604 F.2d 304, 308 (4th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1014 , 100 S.Ct. 664 , 62 L.Ed.2d 644 (1980); United States v. Williams, 617 F.2d 1063, 1075, 1090 (5th Cir. 1980) (en banc); id., at 1092 (Roney, J., specially concurring); Riesenfeld, supra, at 903 n.56; Coast Guard Authority, supra, at 328 (“As long as the flag state consents expressly to Coast Guard searches of its vessels, . . . [subsequent] seizures do not violate article 6, because the rule of noninterference is not breached when the foreign flag state vessel receives permission from the state wh…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Alberto Espinosa-Cerpa
See also United States v. Freeman, 579 F.2d 942, 946-47 (5th Cir.1978) (articulating bases for not applying land-based search and seizure principles to stops at sea). 15 Although this authority most commonly is invoked to justify stops ostensibly made for the purpose of safety and documentation inspections, e. g., United States v. Robbins, 623 F.2d at 420 , this court has also held that the authority permissibly extends to boardings "to look for obvious customs and narcotics violations." United States v. Conroy, 589 F.2d 1258, 1265 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 831 , 100 S.Ct. 60 , 62 L.E…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Demanett
See, e. g., United States v. Conroy, 589 F.2d 1258, 1264-65 (5th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 831 , 100 S.Ct. 60 , 62 L.Ed.2d 40 (1980); United States v. Cadena, 585 F.2d 1252, 1262 (5th Cir. 1978); United States v. Toscanino, 500 F.2d 267, 280 (2d Cir. 1974).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Demanett, Ronald S. Appeal of Ronald Demanett. United States of America v. O'dell, Pennell L., Jr., United States of America v. Guerrero-Chaguay, Ernesto Bolivar, United States of America v. Castillo-Yepes, Clemente, United States of America v. Gombrewicz, Charles P. Appeal of Charles Gombrewicz
See, e. g., United States v. Conroy, 589 F.2d 1258, 1264-65 (5th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 831 , 100 S.Ct. 60 , 62 L.Ed.2d 40 (1980); United States v. Cadena, 585 F.2d 1252, 1262 (5th Cir. 1978); United States v. Toscanino, 500 F.2d 267, 280 (2d Cir. 1974).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
John W. Chapman and Hattie Chapman v. Aetna Finance Company, Timothy Burgess v. Mitchell Motors, Inc. And General Motors Acceptance Corporation, Defendants
Compare Spartan Grain & Mill Co. v. Ayers, 517 F.2d 214 (5th Cir. 1975) (dictum) (compulsory) with Spartan Grain & Mill Co. v. Ayers, 581 F.2d 419 (5th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 100 S.Ct. 59 , 62 L.Ed.2d 39 (1979) (dictum) (permissive).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Chapman v. Aetna Finance Co.
Compare Spartan Grain & Mill Co. v. Ayers, 517 F.2d 214 (5th Cir. 1975) (dictum) (compulsory) with Spartan Grain & Mill Co. v. Ayers, 581 F.2d 419 (5th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 100 S.Ct. 59 , 62 L.Ed.2d 39 (1979) (dictum) (permissive).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Solomon
v.
West Virginia
v.
West Virginia
No. 78-1692.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 1, 1979.
Published
Sup. Ct. App. W. Va. Certiorari denied.