green
Positive treatment
7.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1979 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1979
2002
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 26 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
United States v. Plescia
E.g., United States v. Vazquez, 605 F.2d 1269, 1276 (2nd Cir.1979) cert. denied, 444 U.S. 981 , 100 S.Ct. 484 , 62 L.Ed.2d 408 *1078 (1979); United States v. Scafidi, 564 F.2d 633, 641 (2nd Cir.1977) cert. denied, 436 U.S. 903 , 98 S.Ct. 2231 , 56 L.Ed.2d 400, 401 (1978); United States v. Fury, 554 F.2d 522, 533 (2nd Cir.), cert. denied, 433 U.S. 910 , 97 S.Ct. 2978 , 53 L.Ed.2d 1095 (1977); United States v. Gigante, 538 F.2d 502, 507-08 (2nd Cir.1976).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Ray v. United States
E.g., Sousa v. United States, 400 A.2d 1036, 1040 (D.C.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 981 , 100 5.Ct. 484, 62 L.Ed.2d 408 (1979) (applying 8(b) to joinder of several offenses committed by several defendants); United States v. Jackson, supra, 183 U.S.App.D.C. at 274-75 , 562 F.2d at 793-94 (two defendants, two offenses, under 8(b)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Smith v. United States
See Sousa v. United States, 400 A.2d 1036, 1042 (D.C.) (finding that the co-defendants' defenses were not irreconcilable simply be *121 cause the defendants admitted being present at the scene of the crime but denied participation in the criminal conduct), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 981 , 100 S.Ct. 484 , 62 L.Ed.2d 408 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
Void v. United States
See Sousa v. United States, 400 A.2d 1036, 1040 (D.C.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 981 , 100 S.Ct. 484 , 485, 62 L.Ed.2d 408 (1979); see also Arnold v. United States, 511 A.2d 399, 404 (D.C.1986) (citations omitted).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Donald Carson, United States of America v. Anthony Gallagher
See United States v. Nersesian, 824 F.2d 1294, 1305-06 (2d Cir.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 957 , 108 S.Ct. 355 , 98 L.Ed.2d 380 (1987) (‘‘[t]he brief [three day] gap between the termination of the first wiretap order and the issuance of the second does not prevent the latter from being an extension of the former") (citing United States v. Vazquez, 605 F.2d 1269, 1277-78 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 981 , 100 S.Ct. 484 , 62 L.Ed.2d 408 (1979)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hill v. United States
(2×)
See Sousa v. United States, 400 A.2d 1036, 1041 (D.C.) (citing Schaffer v. United States, 362 U.S. 511, 516 , 80 S.Ct. 945, 948 , 4 L.Ed.2d 921 (1960)), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 981 , 100 S.Ct. 484 , 62 L.Ed.2d 408 (1979); see also Ready v. United States, 445 A.2d 982 , 987-88 n. 10 (D.C.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1025 , 103 S.Ct. 1279 , 75 L.Ed.2d 498 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Burford
See United States v. Vazquez, 605 F.2d 1269, 1274 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 981 , 100 S.Ct. 484 , 62 L.Ed.2d 408 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
Wynn v. United States
See Sousa v. United States, 400 A.2d 1036, 1044 (D.C.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 981 , 100 S.Ct. 484 , 62 L.Ed.2d 408 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Murad Nersesian
See United States v. Vazquez, 605 F.2d 1269, 1277-78 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 981 , 100 S.Ct. 484 , 62 L.Ed.2d 408 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Feola
See United States v. Vasquez, 605 F.2d 1269 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 981 , 100 S.Ct. 484 , 62 L.Ed.2d 408 (1979).
examined
Cited "see"
United States v. Venuti
(3×)
See United States v. Vazquez, 605 F.2d 1269, 1278 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 981 , 100 S.Ct. 484 , 62 L.Ed.2d 408 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Mora
See, United States v. Vazquez, 605 F.2d 1269, 1282 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 981 , 1019, 100 S.Ct. 484 , 674, 62 L.Ed.2d 408 , 649 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Castellano
The Second Circuit has consistently held that the purpose of these “other investigative techniques” requirements “is not to foreclose electronic surveillance until every other imaginable method of investigation has been unsuccessfully attempted, but simply to inform the issuing judge of the difficulties involved in the use of conventional techniques.” Moreover, the required showing is to “be tested in a practical and commonsense fashion.” In short, the requirement is “simply designed to assure that wiretapping is not resorted to in situations where traditional investigation techn…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Massino
See United States v. Vazquez, 605 F.2d 1269, 1282 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 981 , 100 S.Ct. 484 , 62 L.Ed.2d 408 (1979); United States v. Fury, supra, at 530.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Ragusa
See United States v. Vazquez, 605 F.2d 1269, 1276-77 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 981 , 100 S.Ct. 484 , 62 L.Ed.2d 408 (1979); United States v. Sotomayor, 592 F.2d 1219, 1223 (2d Cir.), cert. denied sub nom, Crespo v. United States, 442 U.S. 919 , 99 S.Ct. 2842 , 61 L.Ed.2d 286 (1979); United States v. Manfredi, 488 F.2d 588, 592 (2d Cir.1973), cert. denied, 417 U.S. 936 , 94 S.Ct. 2651 , 41 L.Ed.2d 240 (1974).
examined
Cited "see"
United States v. Guy Mickey McNulty George O'brien, Theodore Tulper, Donald Staadts, James Nestoff and Dennis Valley
(4×)
See United States v. Vazquez, 605 F.2d 1269, 1274-80 (2d Cir.1979), ce rt. denied, 444 U.S. 981 , 100 S.Ct. 484 , 62 L.Ed.2d 408 (1979), 444 U.S. 1019 , 100 S.Ct. 674 , 62 L.Ed.2d 649 (1980); United States v. Sotomayor, 592 F.2d 1219, 1222-27 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 442 U.S. 919 , 99 S.Ct. 2842 , 61 L.Ed.2d 286 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Van Horn
See United States v. Vazquez, 605 F.2d 1269 , 1280 n. 26 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 981 , 100 S.Ct. 484 , 62 L.Ed.2d 408 (1979); and United States v. Howell, 581 F.Supp. 65, 68 (D.Neb.1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Tehfe
See United States v. Vazquez, 605 F.2d 1269 , 1280 n. 26 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 981 , 1019, 100 S.Ct. 484 , 674, 62 L.Ed.2d 408 , 649 (1979); see also State v. Sanchez, 149 N.J.Super. 381, 394-97 , 373 A.2d 1028, 1034-36 (Law Div.1977) (suggesting differences between federal and New Jersey wiretap statute in other areas). .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Tehfe
See United States v. Vazquez, 605 F.2d 1269 , 1280 n. 26 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 981 , 1019, 100 S.Ct. 484 , 674, 62 L.Ed.2d 408 , 649 (1979); see also State v. Sanchez, 149 N.J.Super. 381, 394-97 , 373 A.2d 1028, 1034-36 (Law Div.1977) (suggesting differences between federal and New Jersey wiretap statute in other areas) 4 The affidavit states that this event occurred in 1982.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Tufaro
See United States v. Vazquez (2d Cir.1979) 605 F.2d 1269, 1281 , cert. denied, 444 U.S. 981 , 100 S.Ct. 484 , 62 L.Ed.2d 408 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Dorfman
See United States v. Vazquez, 605 F.2d 1269, 1281 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 981 , 100 S.Ct. 484 , 62 L.Ed.2d 408 (1979); United States v. Vento, 533 F.2d 838, 844 (3d Cir. 1976); United States v. McHale, 495 F.2d 15, 17-18 (7th Cir. 1974); United States v. Mainello, 345 F.Supp. 863, 869-70 (E.D.N.Y. 1972); United States v. Becker, 334 F.Supp. 546, 548 (S.D.N.Y.1971).
cited
Cited "see"
Williamson v. United States
See Sousa v. United States, D.C.App., 400 A.2d 1036, 1044 , cert. denied, 444 U.S. 981 , 100 S.Ct. 484 , 62 L.Ed.2d 408 (1979).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Tillman v. United States
See also Sousa v. United States, 400 A.2d 1036,1042 (D.C.), cert denied, 444 U.S. 981 , 100 S.Ct. 484 , 62 L.Ed.2d 408 (1979); Sweet, supra, 438 A.2d at 451 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Antonio Badalamenti, Andrea Gambino, Ferdinando Capasso, Defendants
See also United States v. Vazquez, 605 F.2d 1269, 1278 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 981 , 100 S.Ct. 484 , 62 L.Ed.2d 408 (1980) (delay beyond one or two days calls for explanation).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Orozco
See also United States v. Vazquez, 605 F.2d 1269, 1282 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 981 , 100 S.Ct. 484 , 62 L.Ed.2d 408 (1979); United States v. Tufaro, 593 F.Supp. 476, 485 (S.D.N.Y.1983), aff'd, 762 F.2d 991 (2d Cir. 1985); United States v. Dorfman, 542 F.Supp. 345, 367 (N.D.Ill.1982), aff'd, 690 F.2d 1217 (7th Cir.1982), rev’d, 690 F.2d 1230 (7th Cir.1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Lilla
See, e.g., United States v. Vasquez, 605 F.2d 1269 , 1280 n.26 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 981 , 100 S.Ct. 484 , 62 L.Ed.2d 408 (1979); United States v. Sotomayor, 592 F.2d 1219, 1224-26 (2d Cir. 1979); United States v. Fury, 554 F.2d 522 , 525 n.3 (2d Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 436 U.S. 931 , 98 S.Ct. 2831 , 56 L.Ed.2d 776 (1978); United States v. Hinton, 543 F.2d 1002, 1011 (2d Cir.), cert. denied sub nom., 429 U.S. 980 , 1051, 1066, 97 S.Ct. 493 , 796, 50 L.Ed.2d 589, 783 (1976), 430 U.S. 982 , 97 S.Ct. 1677 , 52 L.Ed.2d 376 (1977); United States v. Marion, 535 F.2d 697, 702 (2d Cir. 1…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Burguieres
v.
Morton-Norwich Products, Inc.
v.
Morton-Norwich Products, Inc.
No. 79-625.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 3, 1979.
Published
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.