green
Positive treatment
6.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1980 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1980
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 16 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Billy Russell Duggan
Id.; see Nash v. Estelle, 597 F.2d 513, 517 (5th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 981 , 100 S.Ct. 485 , 62 L.Ed.2d 409 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Staatz
(2×)
See Nash v. Estelle, 597 F.2d 513 (5th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 981 , 100 S.Ct. 485 , 62 L.Ed.2d 409 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
Castillo v. State
See Nash, supra [Nash v. Estelle, 597 F.2d 513 (5th Cir.1979) cert denied, 444 U.S. 981 , 100 S.Ct. 485 , 62 L.Ed.2d 409 (1979)], at 519; Thompson v. Wainwright, 601 F.2d 768, 772 (5th Cir.1979).
cited
Cited "see"
Sleek v. State
See Nash v. Estelle (5th Cir.1979), 597 F.2d 513 (en bane), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 981 , 100 S.Ct. 485 , 62 L.Ed.2d 409 ; State v. Robtoy (1982), 98 Wash.2d 30 , 653 P.2d 284 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Nollie Lee Martin v. Louie L. Wainwright
(2×)
We previously have held that equivocal invocations of the right to counsel immediately limit the scope of police questioning to "clarifying [the] equivocal request." Thompson v. Wainwright, 601 F.2d 768, 771 (5th Cir.1979); see Nash v. Estelle, 597 F.2d 513, 517 (5th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 981 , 100 S.Ct. 485 , 62 L.Ed.2d 409 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
Williamson v. State
(2×)
See Nash v. Estelle, 597 F.2d 513 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 981 , 100 S.Ct. 485 , 62 L.Ed.2d 409 (1979); People v. Krueger, 412 N.E.2d 537 (111.1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 1019 , 101 S.Ct. 3009 , 69 L.Ed.2d 390 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
Jennings v. State
See Nash v. Estelle, 597 F.2d 513 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 981 , 100 S.Ct. 485 , 62 L.Ed.2d 409 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Prestigiacomo
See Nash v. Estelle, 597 F.2d 513, 517 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 981 , 100 S.Ct. 485 , 62 L.Ed.2d 409 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Wilbert E. Hackley
(2×)
See Nash v. Estelle, 597 F.2d 513 (5th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 981 , 100 S.Ct. 485 , 62 L.Ed.2d 409 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ex Parte Tucker
(2×)
See also State v. Booth, 202 Neb. 692 , 276 N.W.2d 673 , cert. denied, Booth v. Nebraska, 444 U.S. 982 , 100 S.Ct. 485 , 62 L.Ed.2d 409 (1973 [1979]) (tip from citizen plus furtive gestures by suspect amounted to probable cause). "`[T]he " furtive gesture rule" ... had its genesis in Terry and was expanded upon in Sibron [v. New York, 392 U.S. 40 , 88 S.Ct. 1889 , 20 L.Ed.2d 917 (1968)], which provides that a furtive gesture when coupled with prior reliable information may constitute probable cause for search or arrest.' State v. Booth, 202 Neb. at 698 , 276 N.W.2d at 676 (citations omitted). …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Atwell v. State
See also State v. Booth , 202 Neb. 692 , 276 N.W.2d 673 , cert. denied, Booth v. Nebraska , 444 U.S. 982 , 100 S.Ct. 485 , 62 L.Ed.2d 409 (1973) (tip from citizen plus furtive gestures by suspect amounted to probable cause). " '[T]he "furtive gesture rule" . . . had its genesis in Terry and was expanded upon in Sibron [ v. New York , 392 U.S. 40 , 88 S.Ct. 1889 , 20 L.Ed.2d 917 (1968)], which provides that a furtive gesture when coupled with prior reliable information may constitute probable cause for search or arrest.' State v. Booth , 202 Neb. at 698 , 276 N.W.2d at 676 (citations omitted). …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Molina v. State
See also State v. Booth , 202 Neb. 692 , 276 N.W.2d 673 , cert. denied, Booth v. Nebraska , 444 U.S. 982 , 100 S.Ct. 485 , 62 L.Ed.2d 409 (1973) (tip from citizen plus furtive gestures by suspect amounted to probable cause). "[T]he 'furtive gesture rule' . . . had its genesis in Terry and was expanded upon in Sibron [v. New York , 392 U.S. 40 , 88 S.Ct. 1889 , 20 L.Ed.2d 917 (1968)], which provides that a furtive gesture when coupled with prior reliable information may constitute probable cause for search or arrest." State v. Booth , 202 Neb. at 698 , 276 N.W.2d at 676 (citations omitted). "[D…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Carter v. State
(2×)
See also, Nash v. Estelle, 597 F.2d 513 (5th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 981 , 100 S.Ct. 485 , 62 L.Ed.2d 409 (1979); U.S. v. Riggs, 537 F.2d 1219 (4th Cir.1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Eugene Anderson v. Harold J. Smith, Superintendent of Attica Correctional Facility
See, e.g., Nash v. Estelle, 597 F.2d 513, 517 (5th Cir.) (en banc) (suspect’s intent unclear when he expressed contradictory desires, “a desire for counsel and a desire to continue the interview without counsel”), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 981 , 100 S.Ct. 485 , 62 L.Ed.2d 409 (1979); United States v. Riggs, 537 F.2d 1219, 1222 (4th Cir.1976) (suspect’s statement that he had “no information” could be interpreted “as a mere declaration of ignorance not precluding further cooperation with the investigation”). 8 Miranda itself approved such clarifying questions.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Charles C. Jardina
See also Nash v. Estelle, 597 F.2d 513, 517-18 (5th Cir.1979) (en banc), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 981 , 100 S.Ct. 485 , 62 L.Ed.2d 409 (1979).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Nash
v.
Estelle, Corrections Director
v.
Estelle, Corrections Director
No. 79-5225.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 3, 1979.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.