green
Positive treatment
4.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1980 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1980
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Ayala-Gonzalez v. Toledo Dávila
See also 29 C.F.R. § 1601.74 . 2 Part of the analysis *185 wherein the Court thoroughly examined the conflicting opinions of the Court of Appeals is set forth in Fn. 16 of the opinion, which is cited herein for easy reference: Because there is a conflict among the Courts of Appeals on the proper interpretation of the word “filed” in this statute, n. 16, we granted certiorari. [Mohasco Corporation v. Silver], 444 U.S. 990, n. 17 [ 100 S.Ct. 519 , 62 L.Ed.2d 418 (1979) ].
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Jaime Ramos, Jose Angel Castorena, Andres Ramos, Armando Espinosa, and Jose Alvaro Cervantes
See United States v. Barrentine, 591 F.2d 1069 (5th Cir.) (not an abuse of discretion to deny continuance to defendant who retained new attorney with a scheduling conflict just prior to trial), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 990 , 100 S.Ct. 521 , 62 L.Ed.2d 419 (1979). 17 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Buffalo Bills, Inc. v. United States
See Perrin v. United States, 444 U.S. 37, 42 , 100 S.Ct. 311, 314 , 62 L.Ed.2d 199 (Statutory “words will be interpreted as taking their ordinary, contemporary, common meaning____”), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 990 , 100 S.Ct. 520 , 62 L.Ed.2d 419 (1979); J.M.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. MacFarlane
See United States v. Barrentine, 591 F.2d 1069 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 990 , *1170 100 S.Ct. 521 , 62 L.Ed.2d 419 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. White
See United States v. Barrentine, 591 F.2d 1069 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 990 , 100 S.Ct. 521 , 62 L.Ed.2d 419 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Lenwood Lewis White, United States of America v. Terry Joe Tucker, United States of America v. William Johnny Mason, Roger David Handley, David Lee Kelso, and Ray Winford Steele, United States of America v. William David Riccio, United States of America v. Ricky Lynn Creekmore, United States of America v. David Lee Kelso
See United States v. Barrentine, 591 F.2d 1069 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 990 , 100 S.Ct. 521 , 62 L.Ed.2d 419 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
Cannon v. State
(2×)
See Adams v. State, 577 S.W.2d 717 (Tex. Cr.App.1978), cert. granted 444 U.S. 990 , 100 S.Ct. 519 , 62 L.Ed.2d 419 ; Mendoza v. *405 State, 552 S.W.2d 444 (Tex.Cr.App.1977).
cited
Cited "see"
Jerry Lane Jurek v. W. J. Estelle, Jr., Director, Texas Department of Corrections, Respondent
See Adams v. Texas, 444 U.S. 990 , 100 S.Ct. 519 , 62 L.Ed.2d 419 (1979) , granting cert. to Adams v. State, 577 S.W.2d 717 (Tex. Cr.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Sea-Land Service, Inc. v. United States
See also Public Service Co. of New Hampshire v. FERC, 195 U.S.App.D.C. 130, 141 , 600 F.2d 944, 955 , cert. denied, 444 U.S. 990 , 100 S.Ct. 520 , 62 L.Ed.2d 419 (1979); Marine Space Enclosures, Inc. v. FMC, 137 U.S. App.D.C. at 21 n.36, 420 F.2d at 589 n.36; Citizens for Allegan County, Inc. v. FPC, 134 U.S.App.D.C. 229, 232 , 414 F.2d 1125, 1128 (1969).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Sea-Land Service, Inc. v. United States of America and Federal Maritime Commission, Japan Line, Ltd., Lykes Bros. Steamship Co., Inc., United States Lines, Inc., Intervenors. American President Lines, Ltd. v. United States of America and Federal Maritime Commission, United States Lines, Inc., Japan Line, Ltd., Lykes Bros. Steamship Co., Inc., Intervenors. United States Lines, Inc. v. United States of America and Federal Maritime Commission, Japan Line, Ltd., Intervenors
See also Public Service Co. of New Hampshire v. FERC, 195 U.S.App.D.C. 130, 141 , 600 F.2d 944, 955 , cert. denied, 444 U.S. 990 , 100 S.Ct. 520 , 62 L.Ed.2d 419 (1979); Marine Space Enclosures, Inc. v. FMC, 137 U.S.App.D.C. at 21 n.36, 420 F.2d at 589 n.36; Citizens for Allegan County, Inc. v. FPC, 134 U.S.App.D.C. 229, 232 , 414 F.2d 1125, 1128 (1969).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Mohasco Corp.
v.
Silver
v.
Silver
No. 79-616.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 10, 1979.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
C. A. 2d Cir. Motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari granted limited to Question 1 presented by the petition.