green
Positive treatment
7.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1980 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1980
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 25 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Central & Southern Motor Freight Tariff Association, Inc. v. United States of America and Interstate Commerce Commission, Regular Common Carrier Conference, Inc., American Trucking Associations, Inc., Eastern Central Motor Carriers Association, Inc., Interstate Carriers Conference, Groendyke Transport, Inc., Intervenors. Household Goods Carriers' Bureau, Inc. v. United States of America and Interstate Commerce Commission, Groendyke Transport, Inc., Intervenor. The Eastern Central Motor Carriers Association, Inc. And the Regular Common Carrier Conference, Inc. v. United States of America and Interstate Commerce Commission, Chemical Leaman Tank Lines, Inc., International Transport, Inc., Refrigerated International Cargo Haulers, Inc., Groendyke Transport, Inc., Youngblood Transportation Systems, Inc., Coastal Tank Lines, Inc., Central Transport, Inc., Fresh Express, Inc., Allstate Carriers, Inc., Schneider Transport, Inc., Dsi Transports, Inc., Central & Southern Motor Freight Tariff Association, Inc., J.R.S. Leasing Charter, Inc., L.R.C. Truck Lines, Inc., Carnaco Transport, Inc., Riverside Transportation, Inc., Quality Operations, Inc., R.B.C. Transportation, Inc., Southern Motor Carrier Rate Conference, Clearfield Transportation Company, Inc., Miller Transporters, Inc., Allied Van Lines, Inc., Intervenors. The Eastern Central Motor Carriers Association, Inc. v. United States of America and Interstate Commerce Commission
As explained in text, we conclude that it has not 105 Exemption of Motor Contract Carriers from Tariff Filing Requirements, 133 M.C.C. 150, 158 (1983) (Ex Parte No. MC-165) (footnote omitted) In an additional argument claiming legislative adoption by implication, petitioners intimate that Congress codified the Commission's representation before this court in American Trucking Ass'ns, Inc. v. United States, 602 F.2d 444 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 991 , 100 S.Ct. 522 , 62 L.Ed.2d 420 (1979), that the agency would use the tariff-filing requirements to monitor and control dual common/contr…
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Central & Southern Motor Freight Tariff Ass'n v. United States
(2×)
also: Cited "see"
In an additional argument claiming legislative adoption by implication, petitioners intimate that Congress codified the Commission’s representation before this court in American Trucking Ass’ns, Inc. v. United States, 602 F.2d 444 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 991 , 100 S.Ct. 522 , 62 L.Ed.2d 420 (1979), that the agency would use the tariff-filing requirements to monitor and control dual common/contract authority rate abuses, see id. at 451.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Grand Motors, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.
Kuehn v. Garcia, 608 F.2d 1143, 1146 (8th Cir.1979); Inland Oil and Transport Co. v. United States, 600 F.2d 725, 728 (8th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 991 ,100 S„Ct. 522, 62 L.Ed.2d 420 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
B.E. Meyers & Co. v. United States
See Leesona Corp. v. United States, 220 Ct.Cl. 234 , 599 F.2d 958, 969-70 , cert. denied, 444 U.S. 991 , 100 S.Ct. 522 , 62 L.Ed.2d 420 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
Johnson v. Daggett, Van Dover, Donovan & Perry, PLLC
See Inland Oil & Transport Co. v. United States, 600 F.2d 725 (8th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 991 , 100 S.Ct. 522 , 62 L.Ed.2d 420 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
Gargoyles, Inc. v. United States
See Leesona Corp. v. United States, 599 F.2d 958, 976 (Ct.Cl.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 991 , 100 S.Ct. 522 , 62 L.Ed.2d 420 (1979); Penda, 29 Fed.Cl. at 578 .
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Blubaugh
See United States v. Calandrella, 605 F.2d 236, 255 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 991 , 100 S.Ct. 522 , 62 L.Ed.2d 420 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
Hughes Aircraft Co. v. United States
See Leesona Corp. v. United States, 220 Ct.Cl. 234, 244-54 , 599 F.2d. 958, 964-70 , cert. denied, 444 U.S. 991 , 100 S.Ct. 522 , 62 L.Ed.2d 420 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
Winter Park Communications, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, Rainbow Broadcasting Company, Metro Broadcasting, Inc., Winter Park Chamber of Commerce and City of Winter Park, Intervenors. Metro Broadcasting, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, Rainbow Broadcasting Company and Winter Park Communications, Inc., Intervenors
(2×)
See Brewster v. Commissioner, 607 F.2d 1369, 1373 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 991 , 100 S.Ct. 522 , 62 L.Ed.2d 420 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
Winter Park Communications, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission
(2×)
See Brewster v. Commissioner, 607 F.2d 1369, 1373 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 991 , 100 S.Ct. 522 , 62 L.Ed.2d 420 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
ITT Corp. v. United States
(2×)
See Leesona Corp. v. United States, 220 Ct.Cl. 234, 251 , 599 F.2d 958, 968 , cert. denied, 444 U.S. 991 , 100 S.Ct. 522 , 62 L.Ed.2d 420 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
Air Line Pilots Association, International v. U.S. Department of Transportation, Texas Air Corporation, Intervenor. International Association of MacHinists and Aerospace Workers v. U.S. Department of Transportation, Nwa, Inc., Intervenor. Air Line Pilots Association, International v. U.S. Department of Transportation, Twa Pilots' Master Executive Council, Association of Flight Attendants, Intervenors
See Allegheny-Mohawk Merger Case, 59 C.A.B. 22 (1972) 2 The Civil Aeronautics Board ("CAB") administered the Act until its sunset in 1984, at which time DOT assumed this responsibility 3 It is well settled that "we are bound by the principle of stare decisis to 'abide by a recent decision of one panel of this court unless the panel has withdrawn the opinion or the court en banc has overruled it.' " Association of Civilian Technicians v. FLRA, 756 F.2d 172, 176 (D.C.Cir.1985) (quoting Brewster v. Commissioner, 607 F.2d 1369, 1373 (D.C.Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 991 , 100 S.Ct. 5…
cited
Cited "see"
Dynamics Corporation of America, Appellee/cross-Appellant v. The United States, Appellant/cross-Appellee
See Leesona Corp. v. United States, 599 F.2d 958 (Ct.Cl.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 991 , 100 S.Ct. 522 , 62 L.Ed.2d 420 (1979). 5 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Laffey v. Northwest Airlines, Inc.
See Brewster v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 607 F.2d 1369, 1373 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 991 , 100 S.Ct. 522 , 62 L.Ed.2d 420 (1979); United States v. Caldwell, 543 F.2d 1333 , 1369 n. 19 (D.C.Cir.1974) (citing cases), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1087 , 96 S.Ct. 877 , 47 L.Ed.2d 97 (1976). .
discussed
Cited "see"
Mary Pat Laffey v. Northwest Airlines, Inc., Air Line Pilots Association, Non-Aligned Party. (Two Cases) Mary Pat Laffey v. Northwest Airlines, Inc., Air Line Pilots Association, Non-Aligned Party. (Two Cases)
See Brewster v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 607 F.2d 1369, 1373 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 991 , 100 S.Ct. 522 , 62 L.Ed.2d 420 (1979); United States v. Caldwell, 543 F.2d 1333 , 1369 n. 19 (D.C.Cir.1974) (citing cases), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1087 , 96 S.Ct. 877 , 47 L.Ed.2d 97 (1976) 3 The Act specifies four affirmative defenses; they permit payment of different wages for equal work if "made pursuant to (i) a seniority system; (ii) a merit system; (iii) a system which measures earnings by quantity or quality of production; or (iv) a differential based on any other factor other …
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. University Hospital, State University of New York at Stony Brook, Parents of Baby Jane Doe, Intervenors-Defendants-Appellees
(2×)
See American Trucking Associations, Inc. v. United States, 602 F.2d 444, 449-50 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 991 , 100 S.Ct. 522 , 62 L.Ed.2d 420 (1979) (statutory language “should be given its plain, obvious and rational meaning”).
cited
Cited "see"
Lemelson v. United States
See Leesona Corp. v. United States, 220 Ct.Cl. 234 , 599 F.2d 958 , 202 U.S.P.Q. 424 , cert. denied, 444 U.S. 991 , 100 S.Ct. 522 , 62 L.Ed.2d 420 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Albert Ross, Jr.
See United States v. Calandrella, 605 F.2d 236, 250-53 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 991 , 100 S.Ct. 522 , 62 L.Ed.2d 420 (1979); United States v. Cornejo, 598 F.2d 554, 556-57 (9th Cir. 1979) (per curiam); United States v. Stewart, 595 F.2d 500, 504 (9th Cir. 1979) (per curiam); United States v. Berry, 571 F.2d 2 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 840 , 99 S.Ct. 129 , 58 L.Ed.2d 138 (1978); United States v. Reda, 563 F.2d 510 (2d Cir. 1977) (per curiam), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 973 , 98 S.Ct. 1617 , 56 L.Ed.2d 65 (1978); United States v. Montgomery, 558 F.2d 311 (5th Cir. 1977) (per curia…
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Young
See United States v. Calandrella, 605 F.2d 236 (6th Cir.), cert. den., 444 U.S. 991 , 100 S.Ct. 522 , 62 L.Ed.2d 420 (1979); United States v. Stewart, 595 F.2d 500 (9th Cir. 1979); United States v. Berry, 571 F.2d 2 (7th Cir.), cert. den., 439 U.S. 840 , 99 S.Ct. 129 , 58 L.Ed.2d 138 (1978); United States v. Reda, 563 F.2d 510 (2d Cir. 1977), cert. den., 435 U.S. 973 , 98 S.Ct. 1617 , 56 L.Ed.2d 65 (1978); United States v. Montgomery, 558 F.2d 311 (5th Cir. 1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Patino
(2×)
See United States v. Calandrella, 605 F.2d 236, 250-252 (6 Cir. 1979), cert. den. 444 U.S. 991 , 100 S.Ct. 522 , 62 L.Ed.2d 420 (1980); United States v. Choate, 576 F.2d 165 , 182 n.20 (9 Cir. 1978), cert. den. 439 U.S. 953 , 99 S.Ct. 350 , 58 L.Ed.2d 344 (1978); United States v. Berry, 571 F.2d 2, 3 (7 Cir. 1978) (on rehearing), cert. den. sub nom.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Carpentieri
(2×)
See United States v. Calandrella, 605 F.2d 236, 250-53 (6 Cir. 1979), cert. den., 444 U.S. 991 , 100 S.Ct. 522 , 62 L.Ed.2d 420 (1980); C.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
King Instruments Corporation v. Luciano Perego and Tapematic, Defendant/cross-Appellants
(2×)
Such simplistic outlook fails to perceive the underlying significance of the entire market value rule, which was accurately applied by one of our predecessor courts in Leesona Corp. v. United States, supra. In defining those spare parts for which a patent owner may recover, the Court of Claims recognized that parts [must] ... derive their existence and value from the patent. 82 Otari, 767 F.2d at 865 , 226 USPQ at 411 ; See also Leesona Corp. v. United States, 599 F.2d 958, 975 , 220 Ct.Cl. 234 , 202 USPQ 424, 440 , cert. denied, 444 U.S. 991 , 100 S.Ct. 522 , 62 L.Ed.2d 420 (1979) (award of c…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Wilcox Industries, Inc. v. State
See, also, Leesona Corp. v. United States (1979), 599 F.2d 958 , 220 Ct.Cl. 234 , certiorari denied (1979), 444 U.S. 991 , 100 S.Ct. 522 , 62 L.Ed.2d 420 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
25 soc.sec.rep.ser. 443, Medicare&medicaid Gu 37,849, 28 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 223 United States of America v. Bay State Ambulance and Hospital Rental Service, Inc. And Michael G. Kotzen, United States of America v. John L. Felci
That a particular payment was a remuneration (which implies that a service was rendered) rather than a kickback, does not foreclose the possibility that a violation nevertheless could exist. 46 United States v. Greber, 760 F.2d 68, 71 (3d Cir.) (emphasis added), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 988 , 106 S.Ct. 396 , 88 L.Ed.2d 348 (1985); see also United States v. Hancock, 604 F.2d 999, 1001-02 (7th Cir.) (under older statute which did not include "remuneration," rejecting argument that fees for legitimate services could not be illegal kickbacks), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 991 , 100 S.Ct. 521 , 62 L.Ed.2d …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Bay State Ambulance & Hospital Rental Service, Inc.
United States v. Greber, 760 F.2d 68, 71 (3d Cir.) (emphasis added), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 988 , 106 S.Ct. 396 , 88 L.Ed.2d 348 (1985); see also United States v. Hancock, 604 F.2d 999, 1001-02 (7th Cir.) (under older statute which did not include “remuneration,” rejecting argument that fees for legitimate services could not be illegal kickbacks), ce rt. denied, 444 U.S. 991 , 100 S.Ct. 521 , 62 L.Ed.2d 420 (1979).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
American Trucking Assns., Inc.
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 79-510.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 10, 1979.
Published
C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.